Paper · 2018 · Agronomy

Management of Nitrapyrin and Pronitridine Nitrification Inhibitors with Urea Ammonium Nitrate for Winter Wheat Production

H. Habibullah; Kelly A. Nelson; Peter P. Motavalli

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Synchrony between soil mineral nitrogen (N) supply and crop N demand is important for optimal plant growth. Excessively wet conditions expose poorly drained soils to an increased potential of N loss and reduced N use efficiency. A two-year experiment with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was initiated in 2014 and concluded in 2016 in northeastern Missouri in the United States (USA). The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the effects of nitrapyrin and pronitridine nitrification inhibitors (NI) applied as an early or late-split application timing (40:60%) of 79 kg N ha−1 or 112 kg N ha−1 on winter wheat soil and plant N status, as well as grain yield. Both NIs had no effect (p = 0.3917) on yield, while there was an interaction between year and the urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) rate on grain yield. Yields were similar (3550 kg ha−1 to 3686 kg ha−1) in 2015 between UAN application rates. UAN at 112 kg N ha−1 resulted in a 551 kg ha−1 greater yield than UAN at 79 kg N ha−1 in 2016. Nitrapyrin and pronitridine did not significantly affect soil ammonium or nitrate–N concentrations at depths of 0–15 cm and 16–30 cm compared to the absence of NI over the period of three months after application. Nitrapyrin with UAN at 112 kg N ha−1 had the highest grain test weight. Further testing of these NIs in combination with UAN for winter wheat production is needed under different climatic and environmental conditions to develop comprehensive management recommendations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrapyrin had no significant effect on wheat yield.

Treatment
Nitrapyrint0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both NIs had no effect (p = 0.3917) on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrapyrin and Pronitridine Nitrification Inhibitors with Urea Ammonium Nitrate for Winter Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pronitridine had no significant effect on wheat yield.

Treatment
Pronitridinet0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both NIs had no effect (p = 0.3917) on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrapyrin and Pronitridine Nitrification Inhibitors with Urea Ammonium Nitrate for Winter Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year interacted with UAN rate for grain yield.

Treatment
urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) ratee0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was an interaction between year and the urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) rate on grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yields were similar between UAN rates in 2015, at 3550–3686 kg ha−1.

Treatment
UAN application ratese0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Value
3550 kg ha−1 to 3686 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
2015e0
Comparator
UAN application ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields were similar (3550 kg ha−1 to 3686 kg ha−1) in 2015 between UAN application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UAN at 112 kg N ha−1 yielded 551 kg ha−1 more than 79 kg N ha−1 in 2016.

Treatment
UAN at 112 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
551 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
2016e0
Comparator
UAN at 79 kg N ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UAN at 112 kg N ha−1 resulted in a 551 kg ha−1 greater yield than UAN at 79 kg N ha−1 in 2016.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrapyrin did not significantly affect soil ammonium or nitrate–N concentrations.

Treatment
Nitrapyrine0
Outcome
soil ammonium or nitrate–N concentrationse0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Qualifier
depths of 0–15 cm and 16–30 cme0
Comparator
absence of NIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrapyrin and pronitridine did not significantly affect soil ammonium or nitrate–N concentrations at depths of 0–15 cm and 16–30 cm compared to the absence of NI over the period of three months after application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1209 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pronitridine did not significantly affect soil ammonium or nitrate–N concentrations.

Treatment
pronitridinee0
Outcome
soil ammonium or nitrate–N concentrationse0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Qualifier
depths of 0–15 cm and 16–30 cme0
Comparator
absence of NIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrapyrin and pronitridine did not significantly affect soil ammonium or nitrate–N concentrations at depths of 0–15 cm and 16–30 cm compared to the absence of NI over the period of three months after application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1209 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrapyrin with 112 kg N ha−1 UAN had the highest grain test weight.

Treatment
Nitrapyrin with UAN at 112 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
grain test weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrapyrin with UAN at 112 kg N ha−1 had the highest grain test weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended further testing under varied climate and environmental conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
Further testing of these NIs in combination with UANe0
Qualifier
different climatic and environmental conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further testing of these NIs in combination with UAN for winter wheat production is needed under different climatic and environmental conditions to develop comprehensive management recommendations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1479 · show in text ↑

nitrapyrin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

urea ammonium nitrate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrapyrin · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

urea ammonium nitrate · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

96 papers: 70 positive, 26 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.