Paper · 1983 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application Method and Nitrogen Source on Winter Wheat Grain Yield and Leaf Tissue Phosphorus

D. F. Leikam; L. S. Murphy; D. E. Kissel; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
62
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The positive effect of placing N (especially NH + 4 ‐N) with P on crop growth has been demonstrated many times in short‐term greenhouse studies. Under field conditions, however, the effect has not been well defined. The present objective was to evaluate N and P placement methods on the P nutrition and final grain yield of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) grown in the field and greenhouse. Anhydrous ammonia (NH 3 ), urea‐ammonium nitrate solution (UAN), and sodium nitrate (SN) were N sources while liquid ammonium polyphosphate (APP) was the P source. Methods of N‐P application included: knife N‐knife P (‘dual knife’), knife N‐hroadcast P, broadcast N‐knife P, and broadcast N‐broadcast P. Two nitrification inhibitors were included in some studies. In the greenhouse, APP was labelled with 33 P orthophosphate and 32 P pyrophosphate to examine P uptake of its ortho‐ and polyphosphate fractions with different N‐P‐K application methods each with either a NH + 4 ‐N or NO ‐ 3 ‐N source. Dual knife N‐P applications gave higher leaf P concentrations and grain yields than other N‐P application methods in many of the field studies when ammoniacal N sources were used. Sodium nitrate dual knife applications were not as effective as dual knife applications of UAN or ammonia. The inclusion of the nitrification inhibitor nitrapyrin to dual knife treatments increased grain yield and/or leaf tissue P level in two 1978 studies, but had no effect in 1979. In the greenhouse the highest leaf P levels resulted from the banded NH 3 ‐APP application. The banded SN‐APP application gave the second highest P uptake. This study also demonstrated that the N and APP need to be placed together, not separately in the soil. The amounts of the initial ortho‐ and polyphosphate portions of the APP absorbed by the plants seemed to be a function of fertilizer P demand and not related to fertilizer N in the same band. Including KCl in a band of APP did not affect leaf tissue P concentrations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual knife N-P placement with ammoniacal N raised leaf P concentration in many field studies.

Treatment
Dual knife N‐P applicationse0
Outcome
leaf P concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
when ammoniacal N sources were usede0
Comparator
other N‐P application methodse0
Setting
field studiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dual knife N‐P applications gave higher leaf P concentrations and grain yields than other N‐P application methods in many of the field studies when ammoniacal N sources were used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–362 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual knife N-P placement with ammoniacal N raised grain yield in many field studies.

Treatment
Dual knife N‐P applicationse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
when ammoniacal N sources were usede0
Comparator
other N‐P application methodse0
Setting
field studiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dual knife N‐P applications gave higher leaf P concentrations and grain yields than other N‐P application methods in many of the field studies when ammoniacal N sources were used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–362 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium nitrate dual knife placement was less effective than UAN or ammonia placement.

Treatment
Sodium nitrate dual knife applicationse0
Outcome
not as effectivee0
Direction
not as effectivee0
Comparator
dual knife applications of UAN or ammoniae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sodium nitrate dual knife applications were not as effective as dual knife applications of UAN or ammonia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–362 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrapyrin increased grain yield and/or leaf P in two 1978 studies.

Treatment
nitrapyrine0
Outcome
grain yield and/or leaf tissue P levele0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
two 1978 studiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inclusion of the nitrification inhibitor nitrapyrin to dual knife treatments increased grain yield and/or leaf tissue P level in two 1978 studies, but had no effect in 1979.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–362 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrapyrin had no effect in 1979.

Treatment
nitrapyrine0
Outcome
grain yield and/or leaf tissue P levele0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
in 1979e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inclusion of the nitrification inhibitor nitrapyrin to dual knife treatments increased grain yield and/or leaf tissue P level in two 1978 studies, but had no effect in 1979.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–362 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded NH3-APP gave the highest greenhouse leaf P level.

Treatment
banded NH 3 ‐APP applicatione0
Outcome
leaf P levelse0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the greenhouse the highest leaf P levels resulted from the banded NH 3 ‐APP application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–362 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded SN-APP gave the second highest P uptake.

Treatment
banded SN‐APP applicatione0
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
second higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The banded SN‐APP application gave the second highest P uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1619 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–362 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

N and APP needed to be placed together in soil.

Outcome
N and APP need to be placed together, not separately in the soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study also demonstrated that the N and APP need to be placed together, not separately in the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1723 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–362 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absorption of initial APP ortho- and polyphosphate portions appeared dependent on fertilizer P demand.

Treatment
fertilizer P demande0
Outcome
amounts of the initial ortho‐ and polyphosphate portions of the APP absorbed by the plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amounts of the initial ortho‐ and polyphosphate portions of the APP absorbed by the plants seemed to be a function of fertilizer P demand and not related to fertilizer N in the same band.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1915 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–362 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absorption of initial APP ortho- and polyphosphate portions was not related to N in the same band.

Treatment
fertilizer N in the same bande0
Outcome
amounts of the initial ortho‐ and polyphosphate portions of the APP absorbed by the plantse0
Direction
not relatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amounts of the initial ortho‐ and polyphosphate portions of the APP absorbed by the plants seemed to be a function of fertilizer P demand and not related to fertilizer N in the same band.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1915 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–362 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KCl in an APP band did not affect leaf P concentrations.

Treatment
Including KCl in a band of APPe0
Outcome
leaf tissue P concentrationse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Including KCl in a band of APP did not affect leaf tissue P concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1916–1991 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–362 · show in text ↑

nitrapyrin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

ammonium polyphosphate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

potassium chloride · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.