Paper · 2018 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Evaluation of uptake rate and distribution of nutrient ions in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under waterlogging condition

Seyed Keyvan Marashi

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Waterlogging is an important factor which is influence on nutrient uptake. Therefore, in this study, the uptake and distribution of nutrients ions in different parts of plant were investigted in wheat cultivars. This study was conducted at the Agricultural Research Station, Islamic Azad University- Ahvaz Branch. Experimental design was a factorial according to randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. In this experiment three wheat cultivars namely “Chamran”, “Dez” and “Verry/nac” were used. These were grown under no-waterlogging (control), 7 days and 14 days of waterlogging. Meanwhile, waterlogging treatments for each cultivar were given separately at three different growth stages namely at the beginning of tillering stage, at the beginning of stem elongation stage and at the commencement of booting stage. The results showed that the concentration of N, K, Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn in root, stem and seed did not affect when waterlogging was applied at different growth stages, significantly. Duration of waterlogging significantly decreased concentration of N, K, Cu and Zn in all parts of plant. The concentration of Fe and Mn in the root increased significantly after duration of waterlogging, but decreased in stem and seed. Results also showed a significant difference between tested wheat cultivars for concentration of N, K, Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn in all parts of plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging at different growth stages did not significantly change measured nutrient concentrations.

Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
concentration of N, K, Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn in root, stem and seede0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
different growth stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the concentration of N, K, Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn in root, stem and seed did not affect when waterlogging was applied at different growth stages, significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1020 · show in text ↑
e1

“investigted in wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer waterlogging lowered N, K, Cu and Zn concentrations across plant parts.

Treatment
Duration of waterlogginge0
Outcome
concentration of N, K, Cu and Zn in all parts of plante0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Duration of waterlogging significantly decreased concentration of N, K, Cu and Zn in all parts of plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1125 · show in text ↑
e1

“investigted in wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer waterlogging raised root Fe and Mn concentrations.

Treatment
duration of waterlogginge0
Outcome
concentration of Fe and Mn in the roote0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of Fe and Mn in the root increased significantly after duration of waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“investigted in wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer waterlogging lowered Fe and Mn concentrations in stems and seeds.

Organ / stage
stem and seede0
Treatment
duration of waterlogginge0
Outcome
Fe and Mne0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of Fe and Mn in the root increased significantly after duration of waterlogging, but decreased in stem and seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1256 · show in text ↑
e1

“investigted in wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–210 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested wheat cultivars differed significantly in six nutrient concentrations across plant parts.

Material
tested wheat cultivarse0
Outcome
concentration of N, K, Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn in all parts of plante0
Direction
significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant difference between tested wheat cultivars for concentration of N, K, Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn in all parts of plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1400 · show in text ↑

flooding · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 3 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

flooding · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 8 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.