Abstract
Recent climate changes lead toward possibility of using longer period of warmer temperatures after winter crops harvest (such as wheat, barley, oilseed rape, etc.) for establishing post-harvest crop, such is sorghum, which can produce significant biomass, useful both for feed and bioenergy, even in drier summers, with reduced soil tillage preparation. The trial was set up in Poljanci, Croatia, in years 2015 and 2016 as a split-split-plot design with foliar fertilizers and sorghum cultivars treatments, established by two soil tillage treatments (SD-single and MD-multiple disk harrowing) after winter barley harvest in mid-July, and picked before autumn frosts at the end of November. Foliar fertilizers treatments were C) Control (no fertilization), B) Biological (Condi agro) and M) Mineral (EcoTop Folimax) foliar fertilizers. Cultivars used in trial were KSH3723, KSH3724, Lemnos, Leonie, Merlin, Sammos, Santos, Sole, Tarzan and Zerberus. Foliar fertilizer treatments B and M showed trend of higher dried biomass yield 7 and 11% in comparison with C, respectively. Trend was higher at fresh biomass yield, where B and M scored 12 and 22% higher than C, respectively. There were no statistical differences between soil tillage treatments. The highest fresh biomass yield was recorded for Leonie (32933 kg ha -1 ), followed by Lemnos (27467 kg ha -1 ) and KSH3724 (26600 kg ha -1 ), whereas the lowest yield was recorded for Zerberus (19600 kg ha -1 ).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Biological foliar fertilizer trended toward 7% higher dried biomass yield than the control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Foliar fertilizer treatments B and M showed trend of higher dried biomass yield 7 and 11% in comparison with C, respectively.”
t0“Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral foliar fertilizer trended toward 11% higher dried biomass yield than the control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Foliar fertilizer treatments B and M showed trend of higher dried biomass yield 7 and 11% in comparison with C, respectively.”
t0“Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Biological foliar fertilizer gave 12% higher fresh biomass yield than the control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Trend was higher at fresh biomass yield, where B and M scored 12 and 22% higher than C, respectively.”
t0“Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral foliar fertilizer gave 22% higher fresh biomass yield than the control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Trend was higher at fresh biomass yield, where B and M scored 12 and 22% higher than C, respectively.”
t0“Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
The soil tillage treatments had no statistical difference.
- Treatment
- soil tillage treatmentse0
- Outcome
- statistical differencese0
- Direction
- no statistical differencese0
- Comparator
- soil tillage treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“There were no statistical differences between soil tillage treatments.”
t0“Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Leonie had the highest fresh biomass yield at 32933 kg ha -1.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The highest fresh biomass yield was recorded for Leonie (32933 kg ha -1 )”
t0“Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Lemnos produced 27467 kg ha -1 fresh biomass yield.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“followed by Lemnos (27467 kg ha -1 )”
t0“Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
KSH3724 produced 26600 kg ha -1 fresh biomass yield.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“KSH3724 (26600 kg ha -1 )”
t0“Sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Zerberus had the lowest fresh biomass yield at 19600 kg ha -1.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the lowest yield was recorded for Zerberus (19600 kg ha -1 )”
t0“Sorghum”
The same questions in other papers
boron atom · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.