Paper · 2018 · Food Science & Nutrition Technology

Effects of Soil Tillage and Foliar Fertilization on Biomass Yield of Post - Harvest Seeded Sorghum Cultivars

Bojan Stipesevic

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Recent climate changes lead toward possibility of using longer period of warmer temperatures after winter crops harvest (such as wheat, barley, oilseed rape, etc.) for establishing post-harvest crop, such is sorghum, which can produce significant biomass, useful both for feed and bioenergy, even in drier summers, with reduced soil tillage preparation. The trial was set up in Poljanci, Croatia, in years 2015 and 2016 as a split-split-plot design with foliar fertilizers and sorghum cultivars treatments, established by two soil tillage treatments (SD-single and MD-multiple disk harrowing) after winter barley harvest in mid-July, and picked before autumn frosts at the end of November. Foliar fertilizers treatments were C) Control (no fertilization), B) Biological (Condi agro) and M) Mineral (EcoTop Folimax) foliar fertilizers. Cultivars used in trial were KSH3723, KSH3724, Lemnos, Leonie, Merlin, Sammos, Santos, Sole, Tarzan and Zerberus. Foliar fertilizer treatments B and M showed trend of higher dried biomass yield 7 and 11% in comparison with C, respectively. Trend was higher at fresh biomass yield, where B and M scored 12 and 22% higher than C, respectively. There were no statistical differences between soil tillage treatments. The highest fresh biomass yield was recorded for Leonie (32933 kg ha -1 ), followed by Lemnos (27467 kg ha -1 ) and KSH3724 (26600 kg ha -1 ), whereas the lowest yield was recorded for Zerberus (19600 kg ha -1 ).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological foliar fertilizer trended toward 7% higher dried biomass yield than the control.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Be0
Outcome
dried biomass yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
7e0
Comparator
Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar fertilizer treatments B and M showed trend of higher dried biomass yield 7 and 11% in comparison with C, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral foliar fertilizer trended toward 11% higher dried biomass yield than the control.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Me0
Outcome
dried biomass yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
11%e0
Comparator
Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar fertilizer treatments B and M showed trend of higher dried biomass yield 7 and 11% in comparison with C, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological foliar fertilizer gave 12% higher fresh biomass yield than the control.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Be0
Outcome
fresh biomass yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
12e0
Comparator
Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trend was higher at fresh biomass yield, where B and M scored 12 and 22% higher than C, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral foliar fertilizer gave 22% higher fresh biomass yield than the control.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Me0
Outcome
fresh biomass yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trend was higher at fresh biomass yield, where B and M scored 12 and 22% higher than C, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil tillage treatments had no statistical difference.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
soil tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
statistical differencese0
Direction
no statistical differencese0
Comparator
soil tillage treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no statistical differences between soil tillage treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leonie had the highest fresh biomass yield at 32933 kg ha -1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Material
Leoniee0
Outcome
fresh biomass yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
32933 kg ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest fresh biomass yield was recorded for Leonie (32933 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lemnos produced 27467 kg ha -1 fresh biomass yield.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Material
Lemnose0
Outcome
followed bye0
Value
27467 kg ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by Lemnos (27467 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1359 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KSH3724 produced 26600 kg ha -1 fresh biomass yield.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Material
KSH3724e0
Outcome
KSH3724e0
Value
26600 kg ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KSH3724 (26600 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zerberus had the lowest fresh biomass yield at 19600 kg ha -1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Material
Zerberuse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
19600 kg ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest yield was recorded for Zerberus (19600 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1459 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–98 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.