Paper · 2018 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

Effects of Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilization on Nutrient Content and Quality Attributes of Sweet Cherry Fruits

Kadir UCGUN

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fertilizers are commonly applied to improve the yield and quality in orchards. But unbalanced fertilization negatively affects the nutrient contents of the fruits. Fruits with low energy and high mineral and vitamin contents are significant foods for human nutrition and human health. This study was carried out with ‘0900 Ziraat’ sweet cherry cultivar grafted on ‘Gisela 5’ rootstock in two consecutive years. The effects of different nitrogen (N) and Potassium (K) doses on nutrient content of fruits were investigated. Different doses of N (0, 50, 125 and 250 g N tree-1) and K (0, 50, 125 and 250 g K2O tree-1) were applied beneath the tree canopy in 6 replications and 1 tree in every replication in two consecutive years. Fruit samples were harvested from each tree and fruit colour, firmness, cracking index and nutrient contents (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn and B) were determined. Fruit N content, N:K ratio, L*, a*, C* and firmness values increased with increasing N doses. While K fertilization did not have significant effects on K content and N:K ratio, it negatively influenced the N content of the fruits. It was concluded that N fertilization directly influenced fruit quality attributes, but K fertilization did not have any significant effects on fruit quality parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit nitrogen content and N:K ratio increased with nitrogen dose.

Taxon
Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
increasing N dosese0
Outcome
Fruit N content, N:K ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit N content, N:K ratio, L*, a*, C* and firmness values increased with increasing N doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherry Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit L*, a*, and C* increased with nitrogen dose.

Taxon
Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
increasing N dosese0
Outcome
L*, a*, C*e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit N content, N:K ratio, L*, a*, C* and firmness values increased with increasing N doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherry Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit firmness increased with nitrogen dose.

Taxon
Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
increasing N dosese0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit N content, N:K ratio, L*, a*, C* and firmness values increased with increasing N doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherry Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization did not significantly change fruit potassium content or N:K ratio.

Taxon
Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
K fertilizatione0
Outcome
K content and N:K ratioe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K fertilization did not have significant effects on K content and N:K ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherry Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization reduced fruit nitrogen content.

Taxon
Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
K fertilizatione1
Outcome
N content of the fruitse0
Direction
negatively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it negatively influenced the N content of the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1115 · show in text ↑
e1

“K fertilization did not have significant effects on K content and N:K ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherry Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization influenced fruit quality attributes.

Taxon
Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
Outcome
fruit quality attributese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilization directly influenced fruit quality attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherry Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization had no significant effects on fruit quality parameters.

Taxon
Sweet CherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
K fertilizatione0
Outcome
fruit quality parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K fertilization did not have any significant effects on fruit quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Cherry Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.