Paper · 2018 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Combined effects of biochar and fertilizer application on maize production in dependence on the cultivation method in a sub-humid climate

H. Graef; D. Kiobia; P. Saidia; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Low, erratic rainfall amounts and restricted accessibility of chemical fertilizer for rural farmers in developing countries may have negative effects on crop production. Agricultural methods like biochar applications, fertilizer microdosing and tied ridging can help to mitigate these constraints, but have rarely been studied in combination and under varying water availability. A field trial was conducted in split-plot design over two contrasting cropping seasons in 2016 and 2017 in Tanzania to study the effect of these agricultural methods on maize grain yield, biomass, leaf area index, plant height and soil moisture content. In both seasons each with contrasting irrigation frequencies, fertilizer microdosing increased the grain yield of maize. Biochar alone affected the yield only at high application rates (10 t/ha) and low irrigation frequency. However, when combined with fertilizer microdosing the yield effect of biochar was more pronounced. For example, combining 5 t/ha biochar with fertilizer microdosing under flat tillage increased yield by 170% compared to the control without biochar and fertilizers. Tied ridges increased soil moisture content and tended to increase maize yield compared to flat tillage, whereas biochar application resulted in significantly higher soil moisture contents. Fertilizer microdosing with biochar application can be recommended to improve maize yields mainly under flat tillage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer microdosing increased maize grain yield in both seasons.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
fertilizer microdosinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer microdosing increased the grain yield of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar alone affected yield only at 10 t/ha and low irrigation frequency.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Biochare0
Outcome
yielde0
Qualifier
high application rates (10 t/ha) and low irrigation frequencye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar alone affected the yield only at high application rates (10 t/ha) and low irrigation frequency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining biochar with fertilizer made the biochar yield effect more pronounced.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
fertilizer microdosinge0
Outcome
yield effect of biochare0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when combined with fertilizer microdosing the yield effect of biochar was more pronounced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 5 t/ha with microdosed fertilizer increased yield 170% under flat tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
5 t/ha biochar with fertilizer microdosinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
170%e0
Qualifier
flat tillagee0
Comparator
control without biochar and fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combining 5 t/ha biochar with fertilizer microdosing under flat tillage increased yield by 170% compared to the control without biochar and fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tied ridges increased soil moisture.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Tied ridgese0
Outcome
soil moisture contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
flat tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tied ridges increased soil moisture content and tended to increase maize yield compared to flat tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tied ridges tended to increase maize yield over flat tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Tied ridgese0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
flat tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tied ridges increased soil moisture content and tended to increase maize yield compared to flat tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar significantly increased soil moisture.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
biochar applicatione0
Outcome
soil moisture contentse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochar application resulted in significantly higher soil moisture contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend fertilizer microdosing with biochar under flat tillage for maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
Fertilizer microdosing with biochar applicatione0
Qualifier
mainly under flat tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer microdosing with biochar application can be recommended to improve maize yields mainly under flat tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1440 · show in text ↑

biochar · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

30 papers: 29 positive, 1 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

biochar · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 175 positive, 18 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.