Paper · 2017 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Efficacy of biorational insecticides against major sucking pests of okra

G. RAJESHWARI; A. K. CHAKRAVARTHY; V. SRIDHAR; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Investigations were carried out on the effect of biorational insecticdes against sucking pests of okra during 2015-16 at the ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru. The major sucking insects studied were leafhopper, Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida, whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius, and aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover. All the tested biorationals reduced the sucking pest populations significantly over control. Two sprays of spinosad 45 SC @ 0.2 ml/l, dimethoate 30 EC @ 1.6 ml/l and azadirachtin 10,000 ppm @ 1.0 ml/l were effective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested biorationals significantly reduced sucking pest populations compared with control.

Treatment
tested biorationalse0
Outcome
sucking pest populationse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the tested biorationals reduced the sucking pest populations significantly over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–434 · show in text ↑
t0

“sucking pests of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of spinosad 45 SC at 0.2 ml/l were effective against okra sucking pests.

Treatment
Two sprays of spinosad 45 SC @ 0.2 ml/le0
Outcome
sucking pestst0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two sprays of spinosad 45 SC @ 0.2 ml/l, dimethoate 30 EC @ 1.6 ml/l and azadirachtin 10,000 ppm @ 1.0 ml/l were effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“sucking pests of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of dimethoate 30 EC at 1.6 ml/l were effective against okra sucking pests.

Treatment
dimethoate 30 EC @ 1.6 ml/le0
Outcome
sucking pestst0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two sprays of spinosad 45 SC @ 0.2 ml/l, dimethoate 30 EC @ 1.6 ml/l and azadirachtin 10,000 ppm @ 1.0 ml/l were effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“sucking pests of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of azadirachtin 10,000 ppm at 1.0 ml/l were effective against okra sucking pests.

Treatment
azadirachtin 10,000 ppm @ 1.0 ml/le0
Outcome
sucking pestst0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two sprays of spinosad 45 SC @ 0.2 ml/l, dimethoate 30 EC @ 1.6 ml/l and azadirachtin 10,000 ppm @ 1.0 ml/l were effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“sucking pests of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–72 · show in text ↑

dimethoate · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

spinosad · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

azadirachtin · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 22 positive, 4 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.