Paper · 2025 · Pesticide Research Journal

Evaluation of neonicotinoid insecticide against whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) in okra ecosystem

Vinod Kumar Dubey; Sanjay Kumar Sahoo; Sanhita Chowdhury; et al.

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted at RPCAU, Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar during the Spring-Summer season, 2023. Ten treatments consisting of thiamethoxam 30% FS (@ 1.7, 2.6, 3.4 g ai kg-1 seed; T1, T2, T3) and thiamethoxam 25% WG (@ 25.0, 37.50, 50.0 g ai ha-1; T4, T5, T6), pyriproxyfen 10 EC @ 50 g ai ha-1 (T7), imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 20 g ai ha-1 (T8), standard check of dimethoate 30% EC at 600 g ai ha-1 (T9) were evaluated against whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius). Among the various doses of foliar application of thiamethoxam 25 WG sprayed twice at an interval of 10 days on okra, the treatments T6, T5 and T 4 were statistically at par in terms of their effectiveness (86.6, 84.0, and 82.2% reduction over untreated control) followed by T8(78.1%), T9(73.7%) and T7(69.0%). The okra seed treated plots with thiamethoxam 30% FS formulation were also found to be effective against B. tabaci upto 45 days from seed treatment. Foliar application of thiamethoxam (50 g ai ha-1) gave highest yield and ICBR and it was in line with the application of thiamethoxam 37.5 and 25 g ai ha-1. All the tested insecticide formulations were found to be safe for coccinellid beetles, except dimethoate 30 EC @ 600 g ai ha-1, which have negative effect on coccinellid beetles. Results also showed that none of the insecticide formulations have phytotoxicity effect in okra ecosystem.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam 50.0 g ai ha-1 gave 86.6% whitefly reduction over untreated control.

Treatment
T6e0
Outcome
effectivenesse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
86.6e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“T6, T5 and T 4 were statistically at par in terms of their effectiveness (86.6, 84.0, and 82.2% reduction over untreated control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam T5 gave 84.0% reduction over untreated control.

Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
effectivenesse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
84.0e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“T6, T5 and T 4 were statistically at par in terms of their effectiveness (86.6, 84.0, and 82.2% reduction over untreated control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam T4 gave 82.2% reduction over untreated control.

Treatment
T 4e0
Outcome
effectivenesse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
82.2%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“T6, T5 and T 4 were statistically at par in terms of their effectiveness (86.6, 84.0, and 82.2% reduction over untreated control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam seed treatment was effective against B. tabaci up to 45 days.

Treatment
thiamethoxam 30% FS formulatione0
Interactor
B. tabaciBemisia tabacie0pest
Outcome
effective against B. tabacie0
Qualifier
upto 45 days from seed treatmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The okra seed treated plots with thiamethoxam 30% FS formulation were also found to be effective against B. tabaci upto 45 days from seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam 50 g ai ha-1 gave the highest yield and ICBR.

Treatment
thiamethoxam (50 g ai ha-1)e0
Outcome
yield and ICBRe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of thiamethoxam (50 g ai ha-1) gave highest yield and ICBR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1004 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide formulations other than dimethoate were safe for coccinellid beetles.

Interactor
coccinellid beetlese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
safe for coccinellid beetlese0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“All the tested insecticide formulations were found to be safe for coccinellid beetles, except dimethoate 30 EC @ 600 g ai ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethoate harmed coccinellid beetles.

Treatment
dimethoate 30 EC @ 600 g ai ha-1e0
Interactor
coccinellid beetlese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
effect on coccinellid beetlese0
Direction
negativee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“dimethoate 30 EC @ 600 g ai ha-1, which have negative effect on coccinellid beetles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1261 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the insecticide formulations caused okra phytotoxicity.

Outcome
phytotoxicity effecte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“none of the insecticide formulations have phytotoxicity effect in okra ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1368 · show in text ↑

dimethoate · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

thiamethoxam · Bemisia tabaci · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

thiamethoxam · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.