Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Two sprays of spinosad 45 SC at 0.2 ml/l were effective against okra sucking pests.

A claim from Efficacy of biorational insecticides against major sucking pests of okra · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of spinosad 45 SC at 0.2 ml/l were effective against okra sucking pests.

Treatment
Two sprays of spinosad 45 SC @ 0.2 ml/le0
Outcome
sucking pestst0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two sprays of spinosad 45 SC @ 0.2 ml/l, dimethoate 30 EC @ 1.6 ml/l and azadirachtin 10,000 ppm @ 1.0 ml/l were effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–558
t0

“sucking pests of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–72

Title

Efficacy of biorational insecticides against major sucking pests of okra

G. RAJESHWARI; A. K. CHAKRAVARTHY; V. SRIDHAR; et al. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2017. doi:10.5281/zenodo.5819516

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e86280abfbf535402fa1677df6a7b3ae3b6a8abb3ebfce8a534e4e3dd55e4ab5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

spinosad · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 22 positive, 4 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.