Abstract
In ecological farming systems farmers can't use chemicals against pests. In ecological plant protection the aim is to prevent diseases; if it is not possible the use of allowed materials are permitted. Until now there haven't been enough effective and environmental friendly materials for seed treatment in organic farming. Seed borne diseases of tomato and pepper can cause serious losses in yield, so finding appropriate inhibitors has a great importance. Different materials were tested against these bacterial strains for seed treatment in this study. In vitro trials have shown that vinegar, cider vinegar, red wine vinegar and white wine vinegar have inhibiting effect against the causative agent of bacterial canker (Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis), bacterial speck (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato) of tomato. These materials also have inhibiting impact on the causative agent of bacterial spot of pepper (Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria). Seed treatment with (natural alkaline material) sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO3) had no effect on the examined bacterial strains. Among examined essential oils cinnamon oil seemed to be the most effective, but all oils decreased the germination ability. Thyme and savory teas were effective against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. Other examined materials had insufficient bactericide impact (sucrose, NaCI, ethanol, valerian extract, peppermint tea). The germination test has shown that examined vinegar types don't decrease germination ability.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Vinegar types inhibited the bacterial canker agent of tomato in vitro.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- vinegar, cider vinegar, red wine vinegar and white wine vinegare0
- Interactor
- Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensise0pathogene1 - Outcome
- inhibiting effect against the causative agent of bacterial cankere0
- Direction
- inhibitinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In vitro trials have shown that vinegar, cider vinegar, red wine vinegar and white wine vinegar have inhibiting effect against the causative agent of bacterial canker (Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis), bacterial speck (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato) of tomato.”
e1“Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis”
Claim · model-written summary
Vinegar types inhibited the bacterial speck agent of tomato in vitro.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- vinegar, cider vinegar, red wine vinegar and white wine vinegare0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomatoe0 - Outcome
- bacterial specke0
- Direction
- inhibitinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In vitro trials have shown that vinegar, cider vinegar, red wine vinegar and white wine vinegar have inhibiting effect against the causative agent of bacterial canker (Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis), bacterial speck (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato) of tomato.”
Claim · model-written summary
Vinegar types inhibited the bacterial spot agent of pepper.
- Taxon
- peppere0
- Treatment
- vinegar typese1
- Interactor
- Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria
_(25868012152).jpg?width=60)
Xanthomonas campestrise0 - Outcome
- bacterial spote0
- Direction
- inhibitinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(25868012152).jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“These materials also have inhibiting impact on the causative agent of bacterial spot of pepper (Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria).”
e1“The germination test has shown that examined vinegar types don't decrease germination ability.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sodium hydrogen carbonate had no effect on the bacterial strains.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO3)e0
- Outcome
- examined bacterial strainse0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed treatment with (natural alkaline material) sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO3) had no effect on the examined bacterial strains.”
t0“tomato, and bacterial spot (Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria) in pepper”
Claim · model-written summary
Cinnamon oil was the most effective tested essential oil.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- cinnamon oile0
- Outcome
- most effectivee0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Comparator
- examined essential oilse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among examined essential oils cinnamon oil seemed to be the most effective, but all oils decreased the germination ability.”
t0“bacterial speck (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato) in tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
All tested essential oils decreased seed germination ability.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- all oilse0
- Outcome
- germination abilitye0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among examined essential oils cinnamon oil seemed to be the most effective, but all oils decreased the germination ability.”
t0“bacterial speck (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato) in tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Thyme and savory teas were effective against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Thyme and savory tease0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomatoPseudomonas syringae pv. tomatoe0
- Outcome
- effective against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomatoe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Thyme and savory teas were effective against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato.”
t0“bacterial speck (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato) in tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Other examined materials had insufficient bactericidal impact.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- sucrose, NaCI, ethanol, valerian extract, peppermint teae0
- Outcome
- bactericide impacte0
- Direction
- insufficiente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Other examined materials had insufficient bactericide impact (sucrose, NaCI, ethanol, valerian extract, peppermint tea).”
t0“bacterial speck (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato) in tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Tested vinegar types did not reduce germination ability.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- vinegar typese0
- Outcome
- germination abilitye0
- Direction
- don't decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The germination test has shown that examined vinegar types don't decrease germination ability.”
t0“bacterial speck (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato) in tomato”
The same questions in other papers
ethanol · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
sucrose · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →botanical · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.