Paper · 2017 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Biostimulants from food processing by‐products: agronomic, quality and metabolic impacts on organic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Lara Abou Chehade; Ziad Al Chami; Sandra Angelica De Pascali; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
81
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biostimulants have recently gained increased attention due to their multiple benefits for sustainable agriculture. In this study, three food processing by-products - fennel processing residues (FPR), lemon processing residues (LPR) and brewer's spent grain (BSG) - were investigated as potential sources of biostimulants. Their aqueous extracts as individual and associated applications were assessed for their effects on agronomic, quality and metabolic performance of organic tomato in comparison to extract of humic substances (HS) and untreated control (CTRL). RESULTS: Only FPR extracts stimulated shoot growth and tomato dry matter content, whereas all candidates improved tomato yield. FPR and BSG increased fruit mineral content and BSG-FPR-LPR in combination enhanced titratable acidity. FPR-treated fruits had also 20% more vitamin C than CTRL, and higher phenol content was obtained in those of BSG-LPR. Fruit metabolomic profile showed the tendency of all extracts, except BSG-LPR, to increase tomato citric acid and to decrease β-glucose and methanol concentrations. The analysis revealed accordingly the indispensable role of FPR in combined applications for inducing an HS-like response in fruits. CONCLUSION: The results were indicative of the biostimulant activity of these extracts and demonstrated them, particularly FPR, as promising candidates for enhancing plant productivity and fruit quality. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FPR extracts stimulated tomato shoot growth and dry matter.

Treatment
FPR extractse0
Outcome
shoot growth and tomato dry matter contente0
Direction
stimulatede0
Comparator
untreated control (CTRL)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only FPR extracts stimulated shoot growth and tomato dry matter content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–657 · show in text ↑
e1

“organic tomato in comparison to extract of humic substances (HS) and untreated control (CTRL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All candidate extracts improved tomato yield.

Treatment
all candidatese0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
untreated control (CTRL)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all candidates improved tomato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–703 · show in text ↑
e1

“organic tomato in comparison to extract of humic substances (HS) and untreated control (CTRL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–575 · show in text ↑
e2

“fennel processing residues (FPR), lemon processing residues (LPR) and brewer's spent grain (BSG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FPR increased fruit mineral content.

Treatment
FPRe0
Outcome
fruit mineral contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated control (CTRL)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FPR and BSG increased fruit mineral content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–748 · show in text ↑
e1

“organic tomato in comparison to extract of humic substances (HS) and untreated control (CTRL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSG increased fruit mineral content.

Treatment
BSGe0
Outcome
fruit mineral contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated control (CTRL)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FPR and BSG increased fruit mineral content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–748 · show in text ↑
e1

“organic tomato in comparison to extract of humic substances (HS) and untreated control (CTRL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The BSG-FPR-LPR combination enhanced fruit titratable acidity.

Treatment
BSG-FPR-LPR in combinatione0
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
untreated control (CTRL)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BSG-FPR-LPR in combination enhanced titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–807 · show in text ↑
e1

“organic tomato in comparison to extract of humic substances (HS) and untreated control (CTRL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FPR-treated fruit had 20% more vitamin C than control.

Treatment
FPR-treatede0
Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
moree0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
CTRLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FPR-treated fruits had also 20% more vitamin C than CTRL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–865 · show in text ↑
e1

“organic tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSG-LPR increased fruit phenol content.

Treatment
BSG-LPRe0
Outcome
phenol contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated control (CTRL)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher phenol content was obtained in those of BSG-LPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–925 · show in text ↑
e1

“organic tomato in comparison to extract of humic substances (HS) and untreated control (CTRL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts other than BSG-LPR tended to increase tomato citric acid.

Treatment
all extracts, except BSG-LPRe0
Outcome
tomato citric acide0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
untreated control (CTRL)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all extracts, except BSG-LPR, to increase tomato citric acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1036 · show in text ↑
e1

“untreated control (CTRL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts other than BSG-LPR tended to decrease β-glucose.

Treatment
all extracts, except BSG-LPRe0
Outcome
β-glucosee0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
untreated control (CTRL)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all extracts, except BSG-LPR, to increase tomato citric acid and to decrease β-glucose and methanol concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1090 · show in text ↑
e1

“untreated control (CTRL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts other than BSG-LPR tended to decrease methanol.

Treatment
all extracts, except BSG-LPRe0
Outcome
methanol concentrationse0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
untreated control (CTRL)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all extracts, except BSG-LPR, to increase tomato citric acid and to decrease β-glucose and methanol concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1090 · show in text ↑
e1

“untreated control (CTRL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–575 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FPR was needed in combinations to induce an HS-like fruit response.

Treatment
FPR in combined applicationse0
Outcome
HS-like response in fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indispensable role of FPR in combined applications for inducing an HS-like response in fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1223 · show in text ↑
e1

“organic tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–496 · show in text ↑

botanical · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.