Paper · 2018 · PLoS ONE

Species-specific synergistic effects of two plant growth—promoting microbes on green roof plant biomass and photosynthetic efficiency

Long Xie; Susanna Lehvävirta; Sari Timonen; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
66
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rhizophagus irregularis, an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, a bacterium, are microorganisms that promote plant growth. They associate with plant roots and facilitate nutrient absorption by their hosts, increase resistance against pathogens and pests, and regulate plant growth through phytohormones. In this study, eight local plant species in Finland (Antennaria dioica, Campanula rotundifolia, Fragaria vesca, Geranium sanguineum, Lotus corniculatus, Thymus serpyllum, Trifolium repens, and Viola tricolor) were inoculated with R. irregularis and/or B. amyloliquefaciens in autoclaved substrates to evaluate the plant growth-promoting effects of different plant/microbe combinations under controlled conditions. The eight plant species were inoculated with R. irregularis, B. amyloliquefaciens, or both microbes or were not inoculated as a control. The impact of the microbes on the plants was evaluated by measuring dry shoot weight, colonization rate by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, bacterial population density, and chlorophyll fluorescence using a plant phenotyping facility. Under dual inoculation conditions, B. amyloliquefaciens acted as a "mycorrhiza helper bacterium" to facilitate arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus colonization in all tested plants. In contrast, R. irregularis did not demonstrate reciprocal facilitation of the population density of B. amyloliquefaciens. Dual inoculation with B. amyloliquefaciens and R. irregularis resulted in the greatest increase in shoot weight and photosynthetic efficiency in T. repens and F. vesca.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. amyloliquefaciens facilitated mycorrhizal colonization under dual inoculation in all tested plants.

Taxon
eight local plant speciese1
Treatment
dual inoculatione0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal funguse0symbiont
Second interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0symbiont
Outcome
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus colonizatione0
Direction
facilitatee0
Setting
Finlande1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under dual inoculation conditions, B. amyloliquefaciens acted as a "mycorrhiza helper bacterium" to facilitate arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus colonization in all tested plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1294 · show in text ↑
e1

“eight local plant species in Finland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. irregularis did not reciprocally facilitate B. amyloliquefaciens population density.

Taxon
eight local plant speciese1
Treatment
R. irregularise0
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0symbiont
Second interactor
R. irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
population density of B. amyloliquefaciense0
Direction
did not demonstrate reciprocal facilitatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · Second interactorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“R. irregularis did not demonstrate reciprocal facilitation of the population density of B. amyloliquefaciens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1417 · show in text ↑
e1

“eight local plant species in Finland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation produced the greatest shoot weight increase in T. repens.

Taxon
T. repensTrifolium repense0
Treatment
Dual inoculation with B. amyloliquefaciens and R. irregularise0
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0symbiont
Second interactor
R. irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
shoot weighte0
Direction
greatest increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · Second interactorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dual inoculation with B. amyloliquefaciens and R. irregularis resulted in the greatest increase in shoot weight and photosynthetic efficiency in T. repens and F. vesca.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation produced the greatest photosynthetic efficiency increase in T. repens.

Taxon
T. repensTrifolium repense0
Treatment
Dual inoculation with B. amyloliquefaciens and R. irregularise0
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0symbiont
Second interactor
R. irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiencye0
Direction
greatest increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · Second interactorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dual inoculation with B. amyloliquefaciens and R. irregularis resulted in the greatest increase in shoot weight and photosynthetic efficiency in T. repens and F. vesca.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation produced the greatest shoot weight increase in F. vesca.

Taxon
F. vescaFragaria vescae0
Treatment
Dual inoculation with B. amyloliquefaciens and R. irregularise0
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0symbiont
Second interactor
R. irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
shoot weighte0
Direction
greatest increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria vesca
Fragaria vesca · TaxonJörg Hempel · CC BY-SA 3.0 de · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · Second interactorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dual inoculation with B. amyloliquefaciens and R. irregularis resulted in the greatest increase in shoot weight and photosynthetic efficiency in T. repens and F. vesca.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation produced the greatest photosynthetic efficiency increase in F. vesca.

Taxon
F. vescaFragaria vescae0
Treatment
Dual inoculation with B. amyloliquefaciens and R. irregularise0
Interactor
B. amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0symbiont
Second interactor
R. irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiencye0
Direction
greatest increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria vesca
Fragaria vesca · TaxonJörg Hempel · CC BY-SA 3.0 de · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · Second interactorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dual inoculation with B. amyloliquefaciens and R. irregularis resulted in the greatest increase in shoot weight and photosynthetic efficiency in T. repens and F. vesca.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1586 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

36 papers: 31 positive, 5 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · Fragaria vesca (wild strawberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.