Paper · 2018 · Plant Breeding and Seed Production

Прояв мінливості врожайності та морфологічних і біохімічних ознак у кропу запашного

О. В. Хареба; О. М. Могильна; Л. Ю. Штепа; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Purpose and objectives. To analyze the variability of major features of common dill plants of the local gene pool, to identify sources for the breeding for performance and resistance to weather conditions and to create new genotypes. Material and methods. The study was conducted in compliance with "Methodology of Experimentation in Vegetable Growing" (2001) and "Modern Methods in Vegetable Breeding" (2001) in the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine (Institute of Vegetable and Melon Growing of NAAS) in 2006–2016. The variability and adaptability of traits were eveluated by A.V. Kіlchevskiy, A.V. Khotilyova and L.V. Sazonova’s method. The botanical classification was conducted as B.I. Sechkaryov described. Results and discussion. In 2006–2016, the yield, morphological and biochemical traits of common dill, cultivar Sanat, were analyzed. It was noticed that the plant height variability was medium (the variation coefficient was 23%) over the growing years; the variability of other parameters (leaf length and width, plant width, stem width) was high with the variation coefficient within 25‑41%. The variation coefficient for the stem height was 100%, which indicates the trait heterogeneity. That is, the established parameters of variability specifically indicate that the cultivar is plastic. In addition, there was a strong positive correlation between the leaf width and length and the plant width and height (r = 0.93) and a strong negative correlation between the stem height and width (r = -0.71). The results showed that the variability of dry matter was within 12.01–17.42%, of the total sugar – within 1.19–2.21%, of the ascorbic acid content – within 98.01–121.81 mg/100 g, and of nitrate content - within 1084–1920 mg/kg with the max-min difference of 5.41%, 1.02%, 23.81 mg/100 g, and 836 mg/kg, respectively. The total sugar was considered a stable trait; the nitrate content – a changing one. It was determined that homogeneity could be only achieved in the 5th – 6th generations of intercultivar hybrid populations segregating in the 1st – 3rd generations provided free pollination and selection for increased leaf length and ascorbic acid content. Conclusions. Using periodic selection by major macrotraits with due account for plasticity parameters, we created competitive lines of common dill: Sheva and Chirik exceeding the standard in terms of the ascorbic acid content and yield by 24.7 mg/100 g and 5.1 t/ha, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height variability of common dill was medium (variation coefficient 23%).

Taxon
common dille0
Material
cultivar Sanate0
Outcome
plant height variabilitye1
Value
23%e1

Verbatim

e0

“common dill, cultivar Sanat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–829 · show in text ↑
e1

“the plant height variability was medium (the variation coefficient was 23%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–941 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variability of leaf length and width, plant width and stem width was high.

Taxon
common dille0
Material
cultivar Sanate0
Outcome
leaf length and width, plant width, stem widthe2

Verbatim

e0

“common dill, cultivar Sanat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–829 · show in text ↑
e2

“the variability of other parameters (leaf length and width, plant width, stem width) was high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1059 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem height variation coefficient was 100%, indicating heterogeneity of the trait.

Taxon
common dille0
Material
cultivar Sanate0
Outcome
stem heighte3
Value
100%e3

Verbatim

e0

“common dill, cultivar Sanat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–829 · show in text ↑
e3

“The variation coefficient for the stem height was 100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf width and length were strongly positively correlated with plant width and height (r = 0.93).

Taxon
common dille0
Outcome
correlatione4
Direction
positivee4
Value
r = 0.93e4

Verbatim

e0

“common dill, cultivar Sanat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–829 · show in text ↑
e4

“a strong positive correlation between the leaf width and length and the plant width and height (r = 0.93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1434 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem height and stem width were strongly negatively correlated (r = -0.71).

Taxon
common dille0
Outcome
correlatione5
Direction
negativee5
Value
r = -0.71e5

Verbatim

e0

“common dill, cultivar Sanat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–829 · show in text ↑
e5

“a strong negative correlation between the stem height and width (r = -0.71)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1514 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter varied within 12.01–17.42%.

Taxon
common dille0
Outcome
variability of dry mattere6
Value
12.01–17.42%e6

Verbatim

e0

“common dill, cultivar Sanat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–829 · show in text ↑
e6

“the variability of dry matter was within 12.01–17.42%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1593 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total sugar varied within 1.19–2.21%.

Taxon
common dille0
Outcome
total sugare7
Value
1.19–2.21%e7

Verbatim

e0

“common dill, cultivar Sanat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–829 · show in text ↑
e7

“of the total sugar – within 1.19–2.21%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1633 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid content varied within 98.01–121.81 mg/100 g.

Taxon
common dille0
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente1
Value
98.01–121.81 mg/100 ge1

Verbatim

e0

“common dill, cultivar Sanat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–829 · show in text ↑
e1

“of the ascorbic acid content – within 98.01–121.81 mg/100 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1694 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate content varied within 1084–1920 mg/kg.

Taxon
common dille0
Outcome
nitrate contente1
Value
1084–1920 mg/kge1

Verbatim

e0

“common dill, cultivar Sanat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–829 · show in text ↑
e1

“nitrate content - within 1084–1920 mg/kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1703–1743 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total sugar was a stable trait, whereas nitrate content changed.

Taxon
common dille0
Outcome
total sugare1
Qualifier
a stable traite1

Verbatim

e0

“common dill, cultivar Sanat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–829 · show in text ↑
e1

“The total sugar was considered a stable trait; the nitrate content – a changing one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1917 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Homogeneity was achieved only in the 5th–6th generations of intercultivar hybrid populations, under free pollination and selection.

Taxon
common dille0
Material
intercultivar hybrid populationse1
Outcome
homogeneitye1
Value
5th – 6th generationse1
Qualifier
provided free pollination and selection for increased leaf length and ascorbic acid contente2

Verbatim

e0

“common dill, cultivar Sanat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–829 · show in text ↑
e1

“homogeneity could be only achieved in the 5th – 6th generations of intercultivar hybrid populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1942–2041 · show in text ↑
e2

“provided free pollination and selection for increased leaf length and ascorbic acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2083–2174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sheva and Chirik lines exceeded the standard in ascorbic acid content by 24.7 mg/100 g.

Taxon
common dille1
Material
Sheva and Chirike1
Treatment
periodic selection by major macrotraitse2
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente1
Direction
exceedinge1
Value
24.7 mg/100 ge1
Comparator
standarde1

Verbatim

e1

“competitive lines of common dill: Sheva and Chirik exceeding the standard in terms of the ascorbic acid content and yield by 24.7 mg/100 g and 5.1 t/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2290–2455 · show in text ↑
e2

“Using periodic selection by major macrotraits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2189–2234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sheva and Chirik lines exceeded the standard in yield by 5.1 t/ha.

Taxon
common dille1
Material
Sheva and Chirike1
Treatment
periodic selection by major macrotraitse2
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
exceedinge1
Value
5.1 t/hae1
Comparator
standarde1

Verbatim

e1

“competitive lines of common dill: Sheva and Chirik exceeding the standard in terms of the ascorbic acid content and yield by 24.7 mg/100 g and 5.1 t/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2290–2455 · show in text ↑
e2

“Using periodic selection by major macrotraits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2189–2234 · show in text ↑