Paper · 2018 · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

From field to feed: The effects of fungicidie application and cutting height on the quality and in situ degradability of corn ensilied as whole plant corn silage

Taylor Anne Damery

19
claims
32
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of harvest cut height and foliar fungicide application on brown mid-rib (BMR) whole plant corn silage (WPCS) yield, chemical composition, and in situ degradability. Foliar fungicide (prothioconazole and trifloxystrobin; Delaro, Bayer CropScience) treatments were randomly assigned to one of sixteen 0.21-hectare plots as follows: control (CON), plants received no application; treatment 1 (V5), plants received one application at corn vegetative stage 5 (V5); treatment 2 (V5R1), plants received two applications at V5 and corn reproductive stage 1 (R1); treatment 3 (R1), plants received one application at R1. At reproductive stages R1 and R5, 12 corn plants per plot were evaluated and the number of yellow leaves was recorded. At R5, corn plants in R1 and V5R1 had less (P = 0.0001) yellow leaves (0.35 and 0.47; SEM = 0 .19, respectively) than CON and V5 (0.63 and 1.08; SEM = 0.19, respectively). Ten random plants from each plot were evaluated for disease at stages V5, R1, and R5. Disease prevalence was recorded as percent of the total individual plant infected. Fungicide application had no effect (P = 0.5922) on disease prevalence (1.62%, 1.07%, 1.23%, 1.48%; SEM = 0.30 for CON, V5, V5R1, and R1, respectively). On August 30, 2017, WPCS was harvested at 34.0±1.6% dry matter (DM). Each plot consisted of 16 rows; 8 of which were harvested at a low cut height of 30.5 cm (LC) and 8 of which were harvested at a high cut height of 56 cm (HC). Fungicide application had no effect on WPCS DM, gross yield, or DM yield (P > 0.51). Fungicide application had no significant effect on fermentation profile, chemical composition of WPCS (P > 0.06), but significant two way interactions of fungicide application × days ensiled were observed. Fungicide treated corn ensiled over time had higher VFA scores (P = 0.02), and higher lactic acid (P = 0.02), acetic acid (P < 0.0001), and total acid concentrations (P = 0.03). Dry matter of WPCS was higher (P = 0.0012) in HC than LC (34.57% and 33.43%; SEM = 0.39, respectively). Gross yield of WPCS was lower (P = 0.0023) in HC than LC (38,281 and 41,931; SEM = 1,050; kg/ha, respectively). Dry matter yield of WPCS was lower (P = 0.0284) for HC than LC (13,234 and 14,004; SEM = 362; kg/ha, respectively). Increasing the chop height from 30.5 cm to 56 cm resulted in an 8.7% gross yield loss, but only resulted in a 5.5% loss of dry matter yield content. Raising cut height resulted in decreased acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) concentrations and increased effective degradability (ED) of crude protein (CP) in the rumen. In conclusion, fungicide application had no effect on disease prevalence in corn plants, but did reduce the number of yellow leaves. Fungicide treated corn ensiled over time had higher VFA scores, and higher lactic, acetic, and total acid concentrations. Cut height reduced gross yield and DM yield of WPCS, but increased the DM of WPCS. Raising the cut height had no effect on NDF concentrations or VFA score, but reduced ADF, ADL, lactic acid, acetic acid, and total acid concentrations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

R1-treated corn had fewer yellow leaves than CON and V5 at R5.

Treatment
R1e0
Outcome
yellow leavese0
Direction
lesse0
Value
0.35e0
Qualifier
at R5e0
Comparator
CON and V5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At R5, corn plants in R1 and V5R1 had less (P = 0.0001) yellow leaves (0.35 and 0.47; SEM = 0 .19, respectively) than CON and V5 (0.63 and 1.08; SEM = 0.19, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

V5R1-treated corn had fewer yellow leaves than CON and V5 at R5.

Treatment
V5R1e0
Outcome
yellow leavese0
Direction
lesse0
Value
0.47e0
Qualifier
At R5e0
Comparator
CON and V5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At R5, corn plants in R1 and V5R1 had less (P = 0.0001) yellow leaves (0.35 and 0.47; SEM = 0 .19, respectively) than CON and V5 (0.63 and 1.08; SEM = 0.19, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application had no significant effect on corn disease prevalence.

Treatment
Fungicide applicatione0
Outcome
disease prevalencee0
Direction
no effecte0
Comparator
CONe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide application had no effect (P = 0.5922) on disease prevalence (1.62%, 1.07%, 1.23%, 1.48%; SEM = 0.30 for CON, V5, V5R1, and R1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1280 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn plants in R1 and V5R1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application did not significantly affect silage dry matter, gross yield, or dry matter yield.

Treatment
Fungicide applicatione0
Outcome
WPCS DM, gross yield, or DM yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide application had no effect on WPCS DM, gross yield, or DM yield (P > 0.51)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1594 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application did not significantly affect silage fermentation profile or chemical composition.

Treatment
Fungicide applicatione0
Outcome
fermentation profile, chemical composition of WPCSe0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide application had no significant effect on fermentation profile, chemical composition of WPCS (P > 0.06)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1708 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–161 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application interacted significantly with ensiling duration.

Treatment
fungicide applicatione0
Outcome
two way interactionse0
Qualifier
days ensilede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant two way interactions of fungicide application × days ensiled were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1800 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide-treated ensiled corn had higher VFA scores over time.

Treatment
Fungicide treatede0
Outcome
VFA scorese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
ensiled over timee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide treated corn ensiled over time had higher VFA scores (P = 0.02)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1802–1875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide-treated ensiled corn had higher lactic acid concentration over time.

Treatment
Fungicide treatede0
Outcome
lactic acide0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
ensiled over timee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide treated corn ensiled over time had higher VFA scores (P = 0.02), and higher lactic acid (P = 0.02), acetic acid (P < 0.0001), and total acid concentrations (P = 0.03)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1802–1978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide-treated ensiled corn had higher acetic acid concentration over time.

Treatment
Fungicide treatede0
Outcome
acetic acide0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
ensiled over timee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide treated corn ensiled over time had higher VFA scores (P = 0.02), and higher lactic acid (P = 0.02), acetic acid (P < 0.0001), and total acid concentrations (P = 0.03)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1802–1978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide-treated ensiled corn had higher total acid concentration over time.

Treatment
Fungicide treatede0
Outcome
total acid concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
ensiled over timee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicide treated corn ensiled over time had higher VFA scores (P = 0.02), and higher lactic acid (P = 0.02), acetic acid (P < 0.0001), and total acid concentrations (P = 0.03)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1802–1978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High-cut silage had greater dry matter percentage than low-cut silage.

Treatment
HCe0
Outcome
Dry matter of WPCSe0
Direction
highere0
Value
34.57%e0
Comparator
LCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter of WPCS was higher (P = 0.0012) in HC than LC (34.57% and 33.43%; SEM = 0.39, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1980–2082 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High-cut silage had lower gross yield than low-cut silage.

Treatment
HCe0
Outcome
Gross yield of WPCSe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
38,281e0
Qualifier
kg/hae0
Comparator
LCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gross yield of WPCS was lower (P = 0.0023) in HC than LC (38,281 and 41,931; SEM = 1,050; kg/ha, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2084–2194 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High-cut silage had lower dry matter yield than low-cut silage.

Treatment
HCe0
Outcome
Dry matter yield of WPCSe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
13,234e0
Qualifier
kg/hae0
Comparator
LCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter yield of WPCS was lower (P = 0.0284) for HC than LC (13,234 and 14,004; SEM = 362; kg/ha, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2196–2310 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising chop height caused an 8.7% gross yield loss.

Treatment
Increasing the chop height from 30.5 cm to 56 cme0
Outcome
gross yielde0
Direction
losse0
Value
8.7%e0
Comparator
30.5 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the chop height from 30.5 cm to 56 cm resulted in an 8.7% gross yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2312–2397 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising chop height caused a 5.5% dry matter yield loss.

Treatment
Increasing the chop height from 30.5 cm to 56 cme0
Outcome
dry matter yield contente0
Direction
losse0
Value
5.5%e0
Comparator
30.5 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the chop height from 30.5 cm to 56 cm resulted in an 8.7% gross yield loss, but only resulted in a 5.5% loss of dry matter yield content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2312–2459 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising cut height lowered silage acid detergent fiber and lignin concentrations.

Treatment
Raising cut heighte0
Outcome
acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Raising cut height resulted in decreased acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2461–2575 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising cut height increased effective degradability of crude protein in the rumen.

Treatment
Raising cut heighte0
Outcome
effective degradability (ED) of crude protein (CP) in the rumene0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Raising cut height resulted in decreased acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL) concentrations and increased effective degradability (ED) of crude protein (CP) in the rumen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2461–2653 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising cut height did not affect silage NDF concentration or VFA score.

Treatment
Raising the cut heighte0
Outcome
NDF concentrations or VFA scoree0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Raising the cut height had no effect on NDF concentrations or VFA score”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2993–3064 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising cut height reduced silage lactic, acetic, and total acid concentrations.

Treatment
Raising the cut heighte0
Outcome
lactic acid, acetic acid, and total acid concentrationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Raising the cut height had no effect on NDF concentrations or VFA score, but reduced ADF, ADL, lactic acid, acetic acid, and total acid concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2993–3143 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 150–161 · show in text ↑

fungicide · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

34 papers: 19 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fungicide · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

63 papers: 53 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fungicide · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.