Abstract
Abstract Ripening of tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) was delayed by vacuum infiltrating fruit with CaCl 2 solutions. Ripening was only delayed substantially when Ca content of fruit was raised to greater than 40mg/100g fresh weight from the original concentration of 11mg/100g.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Vacuum infiltration with CaCl 2 solutions delayed tomato fruit ripening.
- Taxon
- tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Organ / stage
- fruite0
- Treatment
- vacuum infiltrating fruit with CaCl 2 solutionse0
- Outcome
- Ripeninge0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Ripening of tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) was delayed by vacuum infiltrating fruit with CaCl 2 solutions.”
Claim · model-written summary
Substantial delay in ripening occurred only above a fruit calcium content of 40mg/100g fresh weight, from an original 11mg/100g.
- Taxon
- tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Organ / stage
- fruite0
- Compound
- Cae0
- Outcome
- Ripeninge0
- Direction
- delayed substantiallye0
- Value
- greater than 40mg/100g fresh weighte0
- Qualifier
- original concentration of 11mg/100ge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Ripening was only delayed substantially when Ca content of fruit was raised to greater than 40mg/100g fresh weight from the original concentration of 11mg/100g.”
t0“tomatoes”
The same questions in other papers
calcium dichloride · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.