Paper · 2018 · Acta Agrobotanica

Solar radiation affects bloat potential of wheat forage

Dariusz Piotr Malinowski; William E. Pinchak; Dipti Pitta; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Frothy bloat is a serious digestive disorder in cattle (Bos taurus L.) grazing winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) pastures in the Southern Great Plains of the USA. Wheat plant metabolism may be one of the factors involved in bloat occurrence. In a series of experiments conducted during 2004–2007, we evaluated the effects of solar radiation intensity (ambient, 100% vs. reduced, 25%), a short-time (24 h vs. 48 h) exposure to solar radiation, and forage allowance (high, 18 kg vs. low, 6 kg DM/100 kg body weight) on seasonal concentration of phenolic compounds and foam strength (a measure of bloat potential) of wheat forage ‘Cutter’. Reduced solar radiation decreased total phenolic concentration and increased foam strength when compared to ambient solar radiation. Forage allowance interacted with solar radiation and short-term exposure treatments in determining phenolic concentrations; however, the effects were inconsistent during and among growing seasons. Concentration of phenolic compounds responded rapidly to sudden changes in weather patterns (passing cold fronts) that were usually associated with significant decrease in solar radiation intensity and temperature. Solar radiation intensity was positively correlated with total phenolic concentration and explained 62% to 72% of the variation in total phenolic concentration. Correlation between temperature and total phenolic concentration varied among growing seasons and explained 9–17% of the variation in total phenolic concentration. Results suggest that phenolic concentration in wheat forage is correlated with solar radiation. The decrease in phenolic concentration and resulting increase of bloat potential are especially pronounced during sudden changes in weather patterns during winter.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced solar radiation decreased wheat total phenolic concentration relative to ambient light.

Treatment
Reduced solar radiatione0
Outcome
total phenolic concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
ambient solar radiatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced solar radiation decreased total phenolic concentration and increased foam strength when compared to ambient solar radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced solar radiation increased wheat forage foam strength relative to ambient light.

Treatment
Reduced solar radiatione0
Outcome
foam strengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
ambient solar radiatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced solar radiation decreased total phenolic concentration and increased foam strength when compared to ambient solar radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage allowance interacted with radiation and short exposure treatments for phenolic concentration, inconsistently across seasons.

Treatment
Forage allowancee0
Outcome
phenolic concentrationse0
Qualifier
inconsistent during and among growing seasonse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Forage allowance interacted with solar radiation and short-term exposure treatments in determining phenolic concentrations; however, the effects were inconsistent during and among growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenolic concentration responded rapidly to passing cold fronts accompanied by reduced radiation and temperature.

Treatment
sudden changes in weather patterns (passing cold fronts)e0
Outcome
Concentration of phenolic compoundse0
Qualifier
significant decrease in solar radiation intensity and temperaturee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentration of phenolic compounds responded rapidly to sudden changes in weather patterns (passing cold fronts) that were usually associated with significant decrease in solar radiation intensity and temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solar radiation correlated positively with total phenolics and explained 62% to 72% of variation.

Treatment
Solar radiation intensitye0
Outcome
total phenolic concentratione0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Value
62% to 72%e0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solar radiation intensity was positively correlated with total phenolic concentration and explained 62% to 72% of the variation in total phenolic concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature correlation with phenolics varied across seasons and explained 9–17% of variation.

Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
total phenolic concentratione0
Value
9–17%e0
Qualifier
varied among growing seasonse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Correlation between temperature and total phenolic concentration varied among growing seasons and explained 9–17% of the variation in total phenolic concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1507 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter weather changes particularly accentuated decreased phenolics and increased bloat potential in wheat forage.

Treatment
sudden changes in weather patterns during wintere0
Outcome
phenolic concentratione0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
resulting increase of bloat potentiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decrease in phenolic concentration and resulting increase of bloat potential are especially pronounced during sudden changes in weather patterns during winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1767 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑

light · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.