Paper · 2018 · Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal

Response to different levels of spacing, nitrogen and plant growth regulators

S. L. Golada; Garima Sharma; V. Nepalia; et al.

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during kharif season, 2010 and 2011 at Rajasthan College of Agriculture Udaipur, to study the effect of crop spacing (45cm × 20cm, 60cm × 15cm and 90cm × 10cm), nitrogen levels (60, 90 and 120 kg ha-1) and plant growth regulators (control, NAA @) 40 ppm and Mepiquat chloride @ 200 ppm) on yield, nutrient content and uptake of baby corn. The higher green cob yield, baby corn yield and green fodder yield was significantly recorded at 60cm × 15cm spacing over 90cm × 10cm. Increasing nitrogen levels up to 90 kg ha-1 showed marked improvement in green cob yield and baby corn yield, but in case of green fodder yield, nitrogen concentration and uptake by fodder recorded significantly highest with 120 kg ha-1. The crop sprayed with Mepiquat chloride @ 200ppm produced the highest green cob yield (5903.03 kg ha-1), baby corn yield (2082.64 kg ha-1) and this was comparable with application of NAA, in case of green fodder yield NAA @ 40 ppm produced significantly higher green fodder yield (26.88 t ha-1) over Mepiquat chloride @ 200 ppm which produced lowest green fodder yield (22.13 t ha-1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 60cm × 15cm increased green cob yield relative to 90cm × 10cm.

Treatment
60cm × 15cm spacinge0
Outcome
green cob yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
90cm × 10cme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The higher green cob yield, baby corn yield and green fodder yield was significantly recorded at 60cm × 15cm spacing over 90cm × 10cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 60cm × 15cm increased baby corn yield relative to 90cm × 10cm.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
60cm × 15cm spacinge0
Outcome
baby corn yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
90cm × 10cme0

Verbatim

e0

“The higher green cob yield, baby corn yield and green fodder yield was significantly recorded at 60cm × 15cm spacing over 90cm × 10cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 60cm × 15cm increased green fodder yield relative to 90cm × 10cm.

Treatment
60cm × 15cm spacinge0
Outcome
green fodder yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
90cm × 10cme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The higher green cob yield, baby corn yield and green fodder yield was significantly recorded at 60cm × 15cm spacing over 90cm × 10cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen up to 90 kg ha-1 improved green cob and baby corn yields.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
Increasing nitrogen levels up to 90 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
green cob yield and baby corn yielde0
Direction
marked improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing nitrogen levels up to 90 kg ha-1 showed marked improvement in green cob yield and baby corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 120 kg ha-1 produced the highest green fodder yield.

Treatment
120 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
green fodder yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“green fodder yield, nitrogen concentration and uptake by fodder recorded significantly highest with 120 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 120 kg ha-1 produced the highest nitrogen concentration and uptake by fodder.

Treatment
120 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
nitrogen concentration and uptake by foddere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“green fodder yield, nitrogen concentration and uptake by fodder recorded significantly highest with 120 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride at 200ppm produced green cob yield of 5903.03 kg ha-1.

Treatment
Mepiquat chloride @ 200ppme0
Outcome
green cob yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5903.03 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mepiquat chloride @ 200ppm produced the highest green cob yield (5903.03 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride at 200ppm produced baby corn yield of 2082.64 kg ha-1.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
Mepiquat chloride @ 200ppme0
Outcome
baby corn yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2082.64 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mepiquat chloride @ 200ppm produced the highest green cob yield (5903.03 kg ha-1), baby corn yield (2082.64 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride yield was comparable to NAA application.

Outcome
comparablee0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
application of NAAe0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“this was comparable with application of NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 40 ppm gave higher green fodder yield than mepiquat chloride.

Treatment
NAA @ 40 ppme0
Outcome
green fodder yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
26.88 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
22.13 t ha-1e0
Comparator
Mepiquat chloride @ 200 ppme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“NAA @ 40 ppm produced significantly higher green fodder yield (26.88 t ha-1) over Mepiquat chloride @ 200 ppm which produced lowest green fodder yield (22.13 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1123 · show in text ↑

chloride · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

mepiquat chloride · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

654 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.