Paper · 2018 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Physiological response of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) to application of chitosan and magnesium-nano fertilizers under irrigation cut-off in a sustainable agriculture system

Jaber Khordadi Varamin; Farzad Fanoodi; Jafar Masuod Sinaki; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to investigate chitosan and magnesium-nano fertilizers’ impact on photosynthetic pigments, protein, proline, and soluble sugar contents of sesame under irrigation cut-off treatment, a split-factorial experiment was conducted based on randomized blocks with three replications. Irrigation cut-off based on BBCH scale as the main factor (normal irrigation and irrigation cut-off in 6 and 75 BBCH stages). Secondary factors as subplot included Oltan and Dashtestan-2 sesame cultivars, and foliar application of Mg-nano fertilizer (application and non-application) and chitosan (control, foliar application of 4.8 g.l-1 in 65 BBCH and 6.4 g.l-1 in 75 BBCH stages). Based on the results, severe drought stress (irrigation up to 65 BBCH) resulted in reducing the mean of chlorophyll a, b, and total compared to the control treatment. Chitosan foliar application yielded more desirable results compared to those of Mg-nano fertilizer and caused an increase in the mean traits of chlorophyll a, b, total, carotenoid, protein, proline, and soluble sugar. In addition, irrigation up to 65 BBCH (severe drought stress) and non-application of nanofertilizer led to a decrease in chlorophyll content and physiological damage. Based on the findings, chitosan biopolymer, as a natural substance, as well as co-application of these two can be an appropriate action in order to decrease the plant damage under drought stress regarding the role of Mg in chlorophyll structure and a large number of the plant vital enzymes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe drought reduced chlorophyll a, b and total relative to control.

Treatment
severe drought stress (irrigation up to 65 BBCH)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b, and totale0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“severe drought stress (irrigation up to 65 BBCH) resulted in reducing the mean of chlorophyll a, b, and total compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan increased chlorophyll a, b and total and carotenoid compared with Mg-nano fertilizer.

Treatment
Chitosan foliar applicatione0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b, total, carotenoide0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
Mg-nano fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan foliar application yielded more desirable results compared to those of Mg-nano fertilizer and caused an increase in the mean traits of chlorophyll a, b, total, carotenoid, protein, proline, and soluble sugar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan increased protein, proline and soluble sugar compared with Mg-nano fertilizer.

Treatment
Chitosan foliar applicatione0
Outcome
protein, proline, and soluble sugare0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
Mg-nano fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan foliar application yielded more desirable results compared to those of Mg-nano fertilizer and caused an increase in the mean traits of chlorophyll a, b, total, carotenoid, protein, proline, and soluble sugar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe drought with no nanofertilizer decreased chlorophyll content and caused physiological damage.

Treatment
irrigation up to 65 BBCH (severe drought stress) and non-application of nanofertilizere0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation up to 65 BBCH (severe drought stress) and non-application of nanofertilizer led to a decrease in chlorophyll content and physiological damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–53 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend chitosan or coapplication with magnesium to reduce drought damage.

Treatment
chitosan biopolymere0
Outcome
decrease the plant damage under drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chitosan biopolymer, as a natural substance, as well as co-application of these two can be an appropriate action in order to decrease the plant damage under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–53 · show in text ↑

application · physiology: osmolytes · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.