Paper · 2019 · TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY

Tree vigor, yield, fruit quality, and antioxidant capacity of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) influenced by different fertilization regimes: preliminary results

Tomo MILOŠEVIĆ; Nebojša MILOŠEVIĆ

15
claims
31
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Tree growth, productivity, fruit quality attributes, and antioxidant activity were tested in apple cultivar Idared under different fertilization treatments from the 22nd to the 23rd year after planting in a heavy acidic soil under western Serbian conditions. Treatments included the use of aged cattle manure, compound NPK (15:15:15) mineral fertilizer, a multinutrient fertilizer commercially named Italpolina (ITP) (NPK + organic carbon + humic acids), two types of N mineral fertilizers (calcium ammonium nitrate [CAN] and urea), and control (no fertilization). Results showed that Idared trees were more vigorous when fertilized with the two N fertilizers than when treated with another mineral, organic, or multinutrient fertilizer. Urea promoted the highest yield per tree and unit area, while yield efficiency was the highest in the control and those under treatment with urea, compound NPK, and manure. Fertilizer regimes had a significant effect on fruit weight and flesh firmness, but their effects on fruit size and dimension ratio were not significant. Compound NPK resulted in the greatest fruit weight, whereas firmness and soluble solids content were the highest in manure treatment. Titratable acidity (TA) was the highest in control trees and after CAN application, while urea induced the highest ripening index. Fertilizer treatments had no significant effect on the contents of invert sugars, sucrose, and total sugars (TS). The TS/TA ratio was highest under urea treatment and lowest in the control and under CAN application. ITP led to the highest values for total phenolics, total non flavonoids, and total antioxidant capacity, while the highest total flavonoid content was obtained with compound NPK.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Idared apple trees were more vigorous when fertilized with the two N fertilizers than with another mineral, organic or multinutrient fertilizer.

Material
Idarede0
Treatment
the two N fertilizerse1
Outcome
vigorouse1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
another mineral, organic, or multinutrient fertilizere1
Setting
western Serbian conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tree growth, productivity, fruit quality attributes, and antioxidant activity were tested in apple cultivar Idared under different fertilization treatments from the 22nd to the 23rd year after planting in a heavy acidic soil under western Serbian conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–257 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that Idared trees were more vigorous when fertilized with the two N fertilizers than when treated with another mineral, organic, or multinutrient fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea promoted the highest yield per tree and per unit area.

Treatment
Ureae2
Outcome
yield per tree and unit areae2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e2

“Urea promoted the highest yield per tree and unit area, while yield efficiency was the highest in the control and those under treatment with urea, compound NPK, and manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–909 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield efficiency was highest in the control and under urea, compound NPK and manure treatments.

Treatment
urea, compound NPK, and manuree2
Outcome
yield efficiencye2
Direction
higheste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e2

“Urea promoted the highest yield per tree and unit area, while yield efficiency was the highest in the control and those under treatment with urea, compound NPK, and manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–909 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer regimes had a significant effect on fruit weight and flesh firmness.

Treatment
Fertilizer regimese3
Outcome
fruit weight and flesh firmnesse3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fertilizer regimes had a significant effect on fruit weight and flesh firmness, but their effects on fruit size and dimension ratio were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1063 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer regimes had no significant effect on fruit size and dimension ratio.

Treatment
Fertilizer regimese3
Outcome
fruit size and dimension ratioe3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fertilizer regimes had a significant effect on fruit weight and flesh firmness, but their effects on fruit size and dimension ratio were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1063 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound NPK gave the greatest fruit weight.

Treatment
Compound NPKe4
Outcome
fruit weighte4
Direction
greateste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compound NPK resulted in the greatest fruit weight, whereas firmness and soluble solids content were the highest in manure treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1197 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Firmness and soluble solids content were highest in the manure treatment.

Treatment
manure treatmente4
Outcome
firmness and soluble solids contente4
Direction
higheste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compound NPK resulted in the greatest fruit weight, whereas firmness and soluble solids content were the highest in manure treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1197 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Titratable acidity was highest after CAN application.

Treatment
CAN applicatione5
Outcome
Titratable aciditye5
Direction
higheste5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e5

“Titratable acidity (TA) was the highest in control trees and after CAN application, while urea induced the highest ripening index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1328 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Titratable acidity was highest in control trees.

Treatment
control treese5
Outcome
Titratable aciditye5
Direction
higheste5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e5

“Titratable acidity (TA) was the highest in control trees and after CAN application, while urea induced the highest ripening index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1328 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea gave the highest ripening index.

Treatment
ureae5
Outcome
ripening indexe5
Direction
higheste5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e5

“Titratable acidity (TA) was the highest in control trees and after CAN application, while urea induced the highest ripening index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1328 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatments had no significant effect on invert sugars, sucrose or total sugars.

Treatment
Fertilizer treatmentse6
Outcome
contents of invert sugars, sucrose, and total sugarse6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fertilizer treatments had no significant effect on the contents of invert sugars, sucrose, and total sugars (TS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1442 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The TS/TA ratio was highest under urea treatment.

Treatment
urea treatmente7
Outcome
TS/TA ratioe7
Direction
higheste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e7

“The TS/TA ratio was highest under urea treatment and lowest in the control and under CAN application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1544 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The TS/TA ratio was lowest under CAN application and in the control.

Treatment
CAN applicatione7
Outcome
TS/TA ratioe7
Direction
loweste7
Qualifier
in the controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e7

“The TS/TA ratio was highest under urea treatment and lowest in the control and under CAN application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1544 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ITP gave the highest values for total phenolics, total non-flavonoids and total antioxidant capacity.

Treatment
ITPe1
Outcome
total phenolics, total non flavonoids, and total antioxidant capacitye1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“ITP led to the highest values for total phenolics, total non flavonoids, and total antioxidant capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1649 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compound NPK gave the highest total flavonoid content.

Treatment
compound NPKe1
Outcome
total flavonoid contente1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest total flavonoid content was obtained with compound NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1723 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

69 papers: 52 positive, 17 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.