Paper · 2011 · HortScience

Differential Effects of Nitrogen Supply on Skin Pigmentation and Flesh Starch Breakdown of ‘Gala’ Apple

Huicong Wang; Lailiang Cheng

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
34
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Apple maturity is often assessed by starch hydrolysis index, skin color, soluble solids, flesh firmness, and the rate of ethylene evolution. In red-fruited apple cultivars, the intensity and extent of coloration is an important consideration in determining the time of fruit harvest. Negative relationships have been found between tree nitrogen (N) status and fruit skin pigmentation, but how N affects flesh starch breakdown has not been examined in detail. The objective of this study was to determine how N supply affects flesh starch breakdown relative to skin color development. Seven-year-old ‘Gala’/M.26 trees were provided with four levels of N (8.8, 26.4, 52.7, and 105.4 g N per tree) in a modified Hoagland's solution. The effects of N supply on yield, fruit quality, and fruit maturation were evaluated. At harvest, fruit in the lowest N treatment was significantly smaller and had lower soluble solids but higher starch concentration, better color, and higher firmness than those grown at higher N supplies. Increasing N supply decreased both anthocyanin synthesis and chlorophyll degradation in fruit skin. Flesh starch concentration was higher at higher N supply at 38 days before harvest but was lower at higher N supply at harvest. Starch degradation was completed earlier during cold storage with increasing N supply. These results indicate that increasing N supply delays skin red color development but accelerates flesh starch degradation in ‘Gala’ apples. These differential effects of N supply should be taken into account when assessing fruit maturity for optimizing harvest time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest the lowest N treatment gave smaller fruit than higher N supplies.

Material
‘Gala’t1
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
lowest N treatmente0
Outcome
fruite0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
higher N suppliese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit in the lowest N treatment was significantly smaller and had lower soluble solids but higher starch concentration, better color, and higher firmness than those grown at higher N supplies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“‘Gala’/M.26 trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest the lowest N treatment gave lower soluble solids than higher N supplies.

Material
‘Gala’t1
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
lowest N treatmente0
Outcome
soluble solidse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
higher N suppliese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit in the lowest N treatment was significantly smaller and had lower soluble solids but higher starch concentration, better color, and higher firmness than those grown at higher N supplies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“‘Gala’/M.26 trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest the lowest N treatment gave higher starch concentration than higher N supplies.

Material
‘Gala’t1
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
lowest N treatmente0
Outcome
starch concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
higher N suppliese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit in the lowest N treatment was significantly smaller and had lower soluble solids but higher starch concentration, better color, and higher firmness than those grown at higher N supplies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“‘Gala’/M.26 trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest the lowest N treatment gave better color than higher N supplies.

Material
‘Gala’t1
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
lowest N treatmente0
Outcome
colore0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
higher N suppliese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit in the lowest N treatment was significantly smaller and had lower soluble solids but higher starch concentration, better color, and higher firmness than those grown at higher N supplies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“‘Gala’/M.26 trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest the lowest N treatment gave higher firmness than higher N supplies.

Material
‘Gala’t1
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
lowest N treatmente0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
higher N suppliese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit in the lowest N treatment was significantly smaller and had lower soluble solids but higher starch concentration, better color, and higher firmness than those grown at higher N supplies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
t1

“‘Gala’/M.26 trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N decreased anthocyanin synthesis in apple skin.

Organ / stage
fruit skine0
Treatment
Increasing N supplye0
Outcome
anthocyanin synthesise0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing N supply decreased both anthocyanin synthesis and chlorophyll degradation in fruit skin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N decreased chlorophyll degradation in apple skin.

Organ / stage
fruit skine0
Treatment
Increasing N supplye0
Outcome
chlorophyll degradatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing N supply decreased both anthocyanin synthesis and chlorophyll degradation in fruit skin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flesh starch concentration was higher at higher N supply 38 days before harvest.

Organ / stage
Fleshe0
Treatment
higher N supplye0
Outcome
Flesh starch concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
38 days before harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flesh starch concentration was higher at higher N supply at 38 days before harvest but was lower at higher N supply at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flesh starch concentration was lower at higher N supply at harvest.

Organ / stage
Fleshe0
Treatment
higher N supplye0
Outcome
Flesh starch concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
at harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flesh starch concentration was higher at higher N supply at 38 days before harvest but was lower at higher N supply at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N supply led to earlier completion of starch degradation during cold storage.

Treatment
increasing N supplye0
Outcome
Starch degradatione0
Direction
earliere0
Setting
cold storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Starch degradation was completed earlier during cold storage with increasing N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N delayed red skin color development in Gala apples.

Material
‘Gala’e0
Treatment
increasing N supplye0
Outcome
skin red color developmente0
Direction
delayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing N supply delays skin red color development but accelerates flesh starch degradation in ‘Gala’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N accelerated flesh starch degradation in Gala apples.

Material
‘Gala’e0
Treatment
increasing N supplye0
Outcome
flesh starch degradatione0
Direction
acceleratese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing N supply delays skin red color development but accelerates flesh starch degradation in ‘Gala’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1475 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend accounting for differential N effects when assessing fruit maturity to optimize harvest time.

Outcome
assessing fruit maturity for optimizing harvest timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These differential effects of N supply should be taken into account when assessing fruit maturity for optimizing harvest time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

69 papers: 52 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 4 positive, 14 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 5 positive, 17 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.