Paper · 2019 · Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment

Impact of Late‐Season Herbicide Applications on Winter Canola Yield and Seed Quality

Victor R. Bodnar; Josh Lofton; Misha R. Manuchehri; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Core Ideas The application of glyphosate during early reproductive growth resulted in significant declines in yield. Decreased yields with late‐season herbicides were associated with an increased number of aborted pods; however, this may not be the only factor contributing to the yield decline. Seed oil content followed the same general trend as grain yield, with decreased oil yields when glyphosate was applied during early reproductive growth. In canola ( Brassica napus L.), control of grassy weeds can typically be achieved in the fall or spring with timely herbicide applications. However, environmental conditions can delay these applications into canola reproductive growth stages, which have an unknown effect on canola productivity. Therefore, a study was conducted to determine the impact of late‐season herbicide applications on canola grain yields and seed quality. The impact of three herbicides (glyphosate [ N ‐(phosphonomethyl)glycine], clethodim [(E)‐2‐[1‐[[3‐chloro‐2‐propenyl)oxy]imino]propyl]5=[2‐(ethylthio)propyl]‐2‐hydroxy‐2‐cyclohexen‐1‐one], and quizalofop‐P‐ethyl [Ethyl(R)‐2‐[4‐(6‐chloroquinoxalin‐2‐yloxy)‐phenoxy]propionate]) and three applications timings (bolting, early flower, and mid‐flower) were investigated on winter canola from 2015 through 2018 in Perkins and Stillwater, OK. Grain yields and pod abortion were collected at maturity. Subsamples of harvested seed were collected from each plot and used for oil analysis. When averaged across years, the application of glyphosate at bolting and early flower resulted in yield decreases of 531 and 488 kg ha –1 compared with the nontreated control. Yield following the application of clethodim at early flower resulted in a 185 kg ha –1 (2017) and 280 (2018) kg ha –1 decrease in yields compared with the control. Although yield decreases were observed following a few treatments, a significant increase in pod abortion was noted following many herbicide treatments, indicating that pod abortion was not the only factor contributing to yield declines. Decreases in oil content were only found following glyphosate applications at bolting and early flower. These results indicate that late‐season herbicide applications, especially glyphosate, should be avoided in winter canola.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at bolting reduced winter canola grain yield by 531 kg ha –1 versus untreated control.

Taxon
winter canolaBrassica napus var. napust0
Treatment
glyphosate at boltinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
531e0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of glyphosate at bolting and early flower resulted in yield decreases of 531 and 488 kg ha –1 compared with the nontreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1636 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at early flower reduced winter canola grain yield by 488 kg ha –1 versus untreated control.

Taxon
winter canolaBrassica napus var. napust0
Treatment
glyphosate at bolting and early flowere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
488 kg ha –1e0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of glyphosate at bolting and early flower resulted in yield decreases of 531 and 488 kg ha –1 compared with the nontreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1636 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clethodim at early flower reduced canola yield by 185 kg ha –1 in 2017.

Treatment
clethodim at early flowere0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
185 kg ha –1e0
Qualifier
2017e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clethodim at early flower resulted in a 185 kg ha –1 (2017) and 280 (2018) kg ha –1 decrease in yields compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clethodim at early flower reduced canola yield by 280 kg ha –1 in 2018.

Treatment
clethodim at early flowere0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
280 (2018) kg ha –1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clethodim at early flower resulted in a 185 kg ha –1 (2017) and 280 (2018) kg ha –1 decrease in yields compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Many late-season herbicide treatments significantly increased pod abortion.

Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
pod abortione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant increase in pod abortion was noted following many herbicide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1870–1954 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield decline with late-season herbicides was associated with increased pod abortion, although the authors considered other factors likely.

Treatment
late‐season herbicidese0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Decreasede0
Qualifier
this may not be the only factor contributing to the yield declinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decreased yields with late‐season herbicides were associated with an increased number of aborted pods; however, this may not be the only factor contributing to the yield decline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at bolting decreased canola seed oil content.

Treatment
glyphosate applications at boltinge0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
Decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decreases in oil content were only found following glyphosate applications at bolting and early flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2041–2143 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at early flower decreased canola seed oil content.

Treatment
glyphosate applications at bolting and early flowere0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
Decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decreases in oil content were only found following glyphosate applications at bolting and early flower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2041–2143 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate during early reproductive growth decreased canola oil yield.

Treatment
glyphosate was applied during early reproductive growthe0
Outcome
oil yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased oil yields when glyphosate was applied during early reproductive growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–447 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend avoiding late-season herbicide applications, especially glyphosate, in winter canola.

Taxon
winter canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0
Outcome
late‐season herbicide applications, especially glyphosate, should be avoidede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“late‐season herbicide applications, especially glyphosate, should be avoided in winter canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2173–2266 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

clethodim · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

glyphosate · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.