Paper · 2018 · FLORESTA

CONTRIBUTION OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER IN THE INITIAL GROWTH OF Toona ciliata and Eucalyptus grandis

Clovis Orlando Da Ros; Edison Rogerio Perrando; Lucindo Somavilla; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The growth of forest species is affected by nutritional restrictions. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the contribution of nitrogen and phosphate fertilization to the initial growth of forest species implanted in field. For this purpose, two experiments were carried out for 11 months, using a randomized complete block design with four replications, in a 2 x 4 factorial arrangement: two forest species (Toona ciliata and Eucalyptus grandis), four nitrogen doses in Experiment I (0, 25, 50 and 75 kg ha-1 of N) and four phosphorus doses in experiment II (0, 50, 100 and 150 kg ha-1 of P2O5). The evaluated parameters were: plant height, diameter at breast height and leaf concentration of nutrients. The data were submitted to analysis of variance. Adjusted regression models were based on the applied amounts of nutrients. The contribution of nitrogen fertilization to growth in height and diameter was equal in forest species, indicating the dose of 47 kg ha -1 of nitrogen with higher growth in the average of the two parameters evaluated. Phosphate fertilization showed no response in the growth of forest species due to the adequate phosphorus content of the soil in which the experiment was conducted. The leaf concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus were not altered by the respective nutrient doses applied in the forest species. However, higher nutrient concentrations were observed in T. ciliata, indicating higher nutritional requirement compared to E. grandis

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization contributed equally to height and diameter growth of the two forest species, with 47 kg ha -1 of nitrogen giving higher average growth

Taxon
Toona ciliata and Eucalyptus grandisToona ciliataEucalyptus grandist0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione1
Outcome
growth in height and diametere1
Direction
highere1
Value
47 kg ha -1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Toona ciliata
Toona ciliata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The contribution of nitrogen fertilization to growth in height and diameter was equal in forest species, indicating the dose of 47 kg ha -1 of nitrogen with higher growth in the average of the two parameters evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“Toona ciliata and Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate fertilization showed no response in the growth of the forest species, attributed to adequate soil phosphorus

Taxon
Toona ciliata and Eucalyptus grandisToona ciliataEucalyptus grandist0
Treatment
Phosphate fertilizatione2
Outcome
growthe2
Direction
no responsee2
Qualifier
adequate phosphorus content of the soile2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Toona ciliata
Toona ciliata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Phosphate fertilization showed no response in the growth of forest species due to the adequate phosphorus content of the soil in which the experiment was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“Toona ciliata and Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and phosphorus leaf concentrations were not altered by the respective nutrient doses applied

Taxon
Toona ciliata and Eucalyptus grandisToona ciliataEucalyptus grandist0
Treatment
respective nutrient dosese3
Outcome
leaf concentrations of nitrogen and phosphoruse3
Direction
not alterede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Toona ciliata
Toona ciliata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eucalyptus grandis
Eucalyptus grandis · TaxonPoyt448 Peter Woodard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The leaf concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus were not altered by the respective nutrient doses applied in the forest species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Toona ciliata and Eucalyptus grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–111 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nutrient concentrations were higher in T. ciliata than in E. grandis, indicating a higher nutritional requirement of T. ciliata

Taxon
T. ciliataToona ciliatae4
Outcome
nutrient concentrationse4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
E. grandise4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Toona ciliata
Toona ciliata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“higher nutrient concentrations were observed in T. ciliata, indicating higher nutritional requirement compared to E. grandis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1496 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Toona ciliataPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · growth · Eucalyptus grandis (rose gum)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.