Paper · 2018 · AN ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE

Effects of different doses of fertilizers in combination of bio-fertilizers with organic manure on growth parameters yield and yield attributes of French bean

Santosh Kumar; Jotish Nongthombam; K.P. Chaudhary; et al.

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Potentiality of three organic manure namely vermicompost, farmyard manure (FYM) and poultry manure (PM) vis--vis, 0 per cent to100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizer -NPK in French bean (Variety: Arka Anoop). Field experiment was conducted in cluster form at Sihphir venghlun village, Aizawl district in Mizoram, NEH Region, India during the year 2015-16. Among the various treatments 75 per cent RDF along with 25 per cent RDF met from vermicompost along with bio-fertilizer (T 2 ) application produced better result in terms of germination per cent (85.34 %), number of pod per plant (20 number), pod yield per plant (300.05 g) and pod yield (14.00 t/ha). And was found to give more remunerative and advantageous in respect of maximum net return (Rs. 254000.00) and cost: benefit ratio (2.64) when compared to other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 gave 85.34% germination, better than other treatments.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
75 per cent RDF along with 25 per cent RDF met from vermicompost along with bio-fertilizer (T 2 )e0
Outcome
germination per cente0
Direction
bettere0
Value
85.34 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“75 per cent RDF along with 25 per cent RDF met from vermicompost along with bio-fertilizer (T 2 ) application produced better result in terms of germination per cent (85.34 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“French bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 gave 20 pods per plant.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
75 per cent RDF along with 25 per cent RDF met from vermicompost along with bio-fertilizer (T 2 )e0
Outcome
number of pod per plante0
Direction
bettere0
Value
20 numbere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“75 per cent RDF along with 25 per cent RDF met from vermicompost along with bio-fertilizer (T 2 ) application produced better result in terms of germination per cent (85.34 %), number of pod per plant (20 number)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“French bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 produced 300.05 g pod yield per plant.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
75 per cent RDF along with 25 per cent RDF met from vermicompost along with bio-fertilizer (T 2 )e1
Outcome
pod yield per plante0
Direction
bettere1
Value
300.05 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pod yield per plant (300.05 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“French bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“75 per cent RDF along with 25 per cent RDF met from vermicompost along with bio-fertilizer (T 2 ) application produced better result”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 produced 14.00 t/ha pod yield.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
75 per cent RDF along with 25 per cent RDF met from vermicompost along with bio-fertilizer (T 2 )e1
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
bettere1
Value
14.00 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pod yield (14.00 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–661 · show in text ↑
t0

“French bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“75 per cent RDF along with 25 per cent RDF met from vermicompost along with bio-fertilizer (T 2 ) application produced better result”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 had maximum net return of Rs. 254000.00.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
bio-fertilizer (T 2 )e1
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs. 254000.00e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum net return (Rs. 254000.00) and cost: benefit ratio (2.64) when compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“French bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“bio-fertilizer (T 2 ) application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–499 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 had a cost: benefit ratio of 2.64 compared with other treatments.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
bio-fertilizer (T 2 )e1
Outcome
cost: benefit ratioe0
Value
2.64e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cost: benefit ratio (2.64) when compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“French bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“bio-fertilizer (T 2 ) application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–499 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

126 papers: 106 positive, 20 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

fertilization · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

143 papers: 121 positive, 22 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

139 papers more in this group

See all 143 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

376 papers: 331 positive, 45 negative or no effect

330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

372 papers more in this group

See all 376 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.