Paper · 2018 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Effect of tillage practices on soil moisture status and performance of Pearl millet cultivars under rainfed conditions

N.K. Pareek; Jitendra Kumar Verma; S.L. Godara; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Research Farm, SKRAU, Bikaner for two consecutive years during kharif 2014 and 2015 to determine the effect of tillage practices on yield, economics and soil moisture status of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] cultivars under rainfed situations. Treatments comprised of four tillage practices in main plots (conventional tillage, zero tillage, conventional tillage + ridging and zero tillage + ridging) and four cultivars of pearl millet in sub plots (Pusa composite 443, CZP 9802, MPMH 17 and RHB 177) were laid out in split plot design with four replications. Pooled analysis of result indicated that practice of conventional tillage + ridging and zero tillage + ridging significantly increased the grain and straw yields and the grain yield increased to the tune of 10.25 and 8.53 per cent, respectively, over conventional tillage. The treatment zero tillage + ridging recorded the highest net return (Rs. 19, 250 ha−1) and B: C ratio (3.03) among all the tillage practices and resulted in Rs. 3750 ha−1 higher net return in comparison to conventional tillage. Significantly higher values of field water use efficiency (FWUE) and soil moisture content (SMC) were also observed under zero tillage + ridging than conventional tillage. Pearl millet hybrids (MPMH 17 and RHB 177) were recorded significantly higher grain yield, harvest index, FWUE and SMC in comparison to composite cultivars. The hybrid MPMH-17 was recorded the highest grain yield (1176 kg ha 1), harvest index (30.18%), net return (Rs. 19, 413 ha−1) and B: C ratio (2.86) and was at par with that of cv. RHB 177. Hybrid MPMH 17 gave the highest net return of Rs. 21682 under conventional tillage + ridging treatment and remained at par where cv. MPMH 17 or RHB 177 when grown under zero tillage + ridging.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage plus ridging increased grain yield by 10.25% over conventional tillage.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
conventional tillage + ridginge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.25e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“practice of conventional tillage + ridging and zero tillage + ridging significantly increased the grain and straw yields and the grain yield increased to the tune of 10.25 and 8.53 per cent, respectively, over conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage plus ridging increased grain yield by 8.53% over conventional tillage.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
zero tillage + ridginge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.53 per cente0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“practice of conventional tillage + ridging and zero tillage + ridging significantly increased the grain and straw yields and the grain yield increased to the tune of 10.25 and 8.53 per cent, respectively, over conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridging with conventional tillage increased straw yield.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
conventional tillage + ridginge0
Outcome
straw yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“practice of conventional tillage + ridging and zero tillage + ridging significantly increased the grain and straw yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet cultivars under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridging with zero tillage increased straw yield.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
zero tillage + ridginge0
Outcome
straw yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“practice of conventional tillage + ridging and zero tillage + ridging significantly increased the grain and straw yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet cultivars under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage plus ridging had the highest net return, Rs. 19, 250 ha−1.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
zero tillage + ridginge0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 19, 250 ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zero tillage + ridging recorded the highest net return (Rs. 19, 250 ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage plus ridging had the highest B:C ratio of 3.03.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
zero tillage + ridginge0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.03e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zero tillage + ridging recorded the highest net return (Rs. 19, 250 ha−1) and B: C ratio (3.03) among all the tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage plus ridging gave Rs. 3750 ha−1 greater net return than conventional tillage.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
zero tillage + ridginge1
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 3750 ha−1e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulted in Rs. 3750 ha−1 higher net return in comparison to conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“zero tillage + ridging recorded the highest net return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–952 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage plus ridging increased field water use efficiency.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
zero tillage + ridginge0
Outcome
field water use efficiency (FWUE)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher values of field water use efficiency (FWUE) and soil moisture content (SMC) were also observed under zero tillage + ridging than conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage plus ridging increased soil moisture content.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
zero tillage + ridginge0
Outcome
soil moisture content (SMC)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher values of field water use efficiency (FWUE) and soil moisture content (SMC) were also observed under zero tillage + ridging than conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MPMH 17 and RHB 177 hybrids had higher grain yield, harvest index, FWUE and SMC than composite cultivars.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Material
MPMH 17 and RHB 177e0
Outcome
grain yield, harvest index, FWUE and SMCe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
composite cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pearl millet hybrids (MPMH 17 and RHB 177) were recorded significantly higher grain yield, harvest index, FWUE and SMC in comparison to composite cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1440 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MPMH-17 had the highest grain yield of 1176 kg ha 1.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Material
MPMH-17e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1176 kg ha 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hybrid MPMH-17 was recorded the highest grain yield (1176 kg ha 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MPMH-17 had the highest harvest index of 30.18%.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Material
MPMH-17e0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
30.18%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hybrid MPMH-17 was recorded the highest grain yield (1176 kg ha 1), harvest index (30.18%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MPMH-17 had the highest net return of Rs. 19, 413 ha−1.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Material
MPMH-17e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 19, 413 ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hybrid MPMH-17 was recorded the highest grain yield (1176 kg ha 1), harvest index (30.18%), net return (Rs. 19, 413 ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MPMH-17 had the highest B:C ratio of 2.86.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Material
MPMH-17e0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.86e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hybrid MPMH-17 was recorded the highest grain yield (1176 kg ha 1), harvest index (30.18%), net return (Rs. 19, 413 ha−1) and B: C ratio (2.86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MPMH 17 under conventional tillage and ridging had the highest net return of Rs. 21682.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Material
MPMH 17e0
Treatment
conventional tillage + ridginge0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 21682e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrid MPMH 17 gave the highest net return of Rs. 21682 under conventional tillage + ridging treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The top net return for MPMH 17 with conventional tillage plus ridging was at par with MPMH 17 or RHB 177 under zero tillage plus ridging.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Material
MPMH 17 or RHB 177e0
Treatment
zero tillage + ridginge0
Outcome
at pare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“remained at par where cv. MPMH 17 or RHB 177 when grown under zero tillage + ridging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1738–1822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–83 · show in text ↑

tillage · physiology: water · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

tillage · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

tillage · quality: grain · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.