Paper · 1992 · HortScience

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PUNGENCY, SOLUBLE SOLIDS, AND SUSCEPTIBILITY TO NECK ROT IN ONIONS

Michael Thornton; James Torell; Daryl Richardson

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted to determine the relationship between pungency, soluble solids content, and susceptibility to neck rot in onions. `Golden Cascade', `Sweet Amber', `Valdez', and `Vega' onions were planted in a field with low soil S content. Sulfur, as coarse-ground calcium sulfate, was applied as a band before planting. After harvest, yield was determined and a sample of jumbo onions was taken from each plot to determine pungency, dry matter content, and soluble solids content. Healthy bulbs were returned to storage and evaluated for neck rot after 4 months. Yield, grade, and neck rot incidence after storage were not affected by S treatments. However, there was a trend toward lower neck rot incidence at the highest S application rate (160 lb/acre). Pungency of jumbo onions increased after the application of S as gypsum. `Sweet Amber' and `Valdez' were less pungent than `Golden Cascade' or `Vega'. Neck rot susceptibility was evaluated with an inoculation test of detached bulb scales. Growth and sporulation of the neck rot pathogen Botrytis allii were reduced by S application. Pungency and neck rot susceptibility were negatively correlated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur treatments did not affect onion yield or grade.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae1
Treatment
S treatmentse2
Outcome
Yield, gradee2
Direction
not affectede2
Setting
field studye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field study was conducted to determine the relationship between pungency, soluble solids content, and susceptibility to neck rot in onions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e2

“Yield, grade, and neck rot incidence after storage were not affected by S treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur treatments did not affect neck rot incidence after storage.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae1
Treatment
S treatmentse2
Outcome
neck rot incidence after storagee2
Direction
not affectede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field study was conducted to determine the relationship between pungency, soluble solids content, and susceptibility to neck rot in onions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e2

“Yield, grade, and neck rot incidence after storage were not affected by S treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest S application rate (160 lb/acre) tended to lower neck rot incidence in onions.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae1
Treatment
highest S application rate (160 lb/acre)e2
Outcome
neck rot incidencee2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
trende2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field study was conducted to determine the relationship between pungency, soluble solids content, and susceptibility to neck rot in onions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, there was a trend toward lower neck rot incidence at the highest S application rate (160 lb/acre).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of S as gypsum increased pungency of onions.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae1
Treatment
application of S as gypsume1
Outcome
Pungencye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Pungency of jumbo onions increased after the application of S as gypsum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–842 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet Amber and Valdez onions were less pungent than Golden Cascade or Vega.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae2
Material
`Sweet Amber' and `Valdez'e1
Outcome
pungente1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
`Golden Cascade' or `Vega'e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“`Sweet Amber' and `Valdez' were less pungent than `Golden Cascade' or `Vega'.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–920 · show in text ↑
e2

“A field study was conducted to determine the relationship between pungency, soluble solids content, and susceptibility to neck rot in onions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S application reduced growth and sporulation of the neck rot pathogen Botrytis allii.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae1
Treatment
S applicatione2
Interactor
Botrytis alliiBotrytis alliie2pathogen
Outcome
Growth and sporulatione2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis allii
Botrytis allii · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field study was conducted to determine the relationship between pungency, soluble solids content, and susceptibility to neck rot in onions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑
e2

“Growth and sporulation of the neck rot pathogen Botrytis allii were reduced by S application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pungency and neck rot susceptibility of onions were negatively correlated.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae2
Outcome
neck rot susceptibilitye1
Direction
negativelye1
Comparator
Pungencye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Pungency and neck rot susceptibility were negatively correlated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1167 · show in text ↑
e2

“A field study was conducted to determine the relationship between pungency, soluble solids content, and susceptibility to neck rot in onions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

45 papers: 38 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

sulfur atom · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.