Abstract
A field study was conducted to determine the relationship between pungency, soluble solids content, and susceptibility to neck rot in onions. `Golden Cascade', `Sweet Amber', `Valdez', and `Vega' onions were planted in a field with low soil S content. Sulfur, as coarse-ground calcium sulfate, was applied as a band before planting. After harvest, yield was determined and a sample of jumbo onions was taken from each plot to determine pungency, dry matter content, and soluble solids content. Healthy bulbs were returned to storage and evaluated for neck rot after 4 months. Yield, grade, and neck rot incidence after storage were not affected by S treatments. However, there was a trend toward lower neck rot incidence at the highest S application rate (160 lb/acre). Pungency of jumbo onions increased after the application of S as gypsum. `Sweet Amber' and `Valdez' were less pungent than `Golden Cascade' or `Vega'. Neck rot susceptibility was evaluated with an inoculation test of detached bulb scales. Growth and sporulation of the neck rot pathogen Botrytis allii were reduced by S application. Pungency and neck rot susceptibility were negatively correlated.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur treatments did not affect onion yield or grade.
- Taxon
- onions
Allium cepae1 - Treatment
- S treatmentse2
- Outcome
- Yield, gradee2
- Direction
- not affectede2
- Setting
- field studye1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“A field study was conducted to determine the relationship between pungency, soluble solids content, and susceptibility to neck rot in onions.”
e2“Yield, grade, and neck rot incidence after storage were not affected by S treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur treatments did not affect neck rot incidence after storage.
- Taxon
- onions
Allium cepae1 - Treatment
- S treatmentse2
- Outcome
- neck rot incidence after storagee2
- Direction
- not affectede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“A field study was conducted to determine the relationship between pungency, soluble solids content, and susceptibility to neck rot in onions.”
e2“Yield, grade, and neck rot incidence after storage were not affected by S treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest S application rate (160 lb/acre) tended to lower neck rot incidence in onions.
- Taxon
- onions
Allium cepae1 - Treatment
- highest S application rate (160 lb/acre)e2
- Outcome
- neck rot incidencee2
- Direction
- lowere2
- Qualifier
- trende2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“A field study was conducted to determine the relationship between pungency, soluble solids content, and susceptibility to neck rot in onions.”
e2“However, there was a trend toward lower neck rot incidence at the highest S application rate (160 lb/acre).”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of S as gypsum increased pungency of onions.
- Taxon
- onions
Allium cepae1 - Treatment
- application of S as gypsume1
- Outcome
- Pungencye1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Pungency of jumbo onions increased after the application of S as gypsum.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sweet Amber and Valdez onions were less pungent than Golden Cascade or Vega.
- Taxon
- onions
Allium cepae2 - Material
- `Sweet Amber' and `Valdez'e1
- Outcome
- pungente1
- Direction
- lesse1
- Comparator
- `Golden Cascade' or `Vega'e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“`Sweet Amber' and `Valdez' were less pungent than `Golden Cascade' or `Vega'.”
e2“A field study was conducted to determine the relationship between pungency, soluble solids content, and susceptibility to neck rot in onions.”
Claim · model-written summary
S application reduced growth and sporulation of the neck rot pathogen Botrytis allii.
- Taxon
- onions
Allium cepae1 - Treatment
- S applicatione2
- Interactor
- Botrytis allii
Botrytis alliie2pathogen - Outcome
- Growth and sporulatione2
- Direction
- reducede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e1“A field study was conducted to determine the relationship between pungency, soluble solids content, and susceptibility to neck rot in onions.”
e2“Growth and sporulation of the neck rot pathogen Botrytis allii were reduced by S application.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pungency and neck rot susceptibility of onions were negatively correlated.
- Taxon
- onions
Allium cepae2 - Outcome
- neck rot susceptibilitye1
- Direction
- negativelye1
- Comparator
- Pungencye1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Pungency and neck rot susceptibility were negatively correlated.”
e2“A field study was conducted to determine the relationship between pungency, soluble solids content, and susceptibility to neck rot in onions.”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
41 papers more in this group
See all 45 papers →sulfur atom · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.