Paper · 2019 · Journal of Experimental Botany

A novel optimization approach incorporating non-stomatal limitations predicts stomatal behaviour in species from six plant functional types

Teresa E Gimeno; Noelia Saavedra; Jérôme Ogée; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
31
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The primary function of stomata is to minimize plant water loss while maintaining CO2 assimilation. Stomatal water loss incurs an indirect cost to photosynthesis in the form of non-stomatal limitations (NSL) via reduced carboxylation capacity (CAP) and/or mesophyll conductance (MES). Two optimal formulations for stomatal conductance (gs) arise from the assumption of each type of NSL. In reality, both NSL could coexist, but one may prevail for a given leaf ontogenetic stage or plant functional type, depending on leaf morphology. We tested the suitability of two gs formulations (CAP versus MES) on species from six plant functional types (C4 crop, C3 grass, fern, conifer, evergreen, and deciduous angiosperm trees). MES and CAP parameters (the latter proportional to the marginal water cost to carbon gain) decreased with water availability only in deciduous angiosperm trees, while there were no clear differences between leaf ontogenetic stages. Both CAP and MES formulations fit our data in most cases, particularly under low water availability. For ferns, stomata appeared to operate optimally only when subjected to water stress. Overall, the CAP formulation provided a better fit across all species, suggesting that sub-daily stomatal responses minimize NSL by reducing carboxylation capacity predominantly, regardless of leaf morphology and ontogenetic stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MES parameters decreased with water availability only in deciduous angiosperm trees.

Taxon
deciduous angiosperm treese0
Outcome
MESe0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
water availabilitye0

Verbatim

e0

“MES and CAP parameters (the latter proportional to the marginal water cost to carbon gain) decreased with water availability only in deciduous angiosperm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–881 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CAP parameters decreased with water availability only in deciduous angiosperm trees.

Taxon
deciduous angiosperm treese0
Outcome
CAP parameterse0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
water availabilitye0

Verbatim

e0

“MES and CAP parameters (the latter proportional to the marginal water cost to carbon gain) decreased with water availability only in deciduous angiosperm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–881 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There were no clear parameter differences between leaf ontogenetic stages.

Taxon
leafe0
Outcome
differences between leaf ontogenetic stagese0
Direction
no clear differencese0

Verbatim

e0

“there were no clear differences between leaf ontogenetic stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–952 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both CAP and MES formulations fit the data in most cases, particularly under low water availability.

Outcome
fit our datae0
Qualifier
particularly under low water availabilitye0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“Both CAP and MES formulations fit our data in most cases, particularly under low water availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1053 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fern stomata appeared to operate optimally only under water stress.

Outcome
stomata appeared to operate optimallye0
Qualifier
only when subjected to water stresse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“For ferns, stomata appeared to operate optimally only when subjected to water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1139 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CAP formulation fitted the data better across all species.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
better fite0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
CAP formulatione0

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0

“the CAP formulation provided a better fit across all species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1210 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that sub-daily stomatal responses predominantly minimize limitations through reduced carboxylation capacity.

Taxon
leafe0
Outcome
minimize NSLe0
Direction
reducinge0
Qualifier
reducing carboxylation capacitye0

Verbatim

e0

“sub-daily stomatal responses minimize NSL by reducing carboxylation capacity predominantly, regardless of leaf morphology and ontogenetic stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1371 · show in text ↑