Paper · 2019 · Tree Genetics & Genomes

Two large-effect QTLs, Ma and Ma3, determine genetic potential for acidity in apple fruit: breeding insights from a multi-family study

S. Verma; K. Evans; Y. Guan; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
76
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Acidity is a critical component of the apple fruit consumption experience. In previous biparental family studies, two large-effect acidity QTLs were reported using freshly harvested fruit. Objectives of this study were to determine the number and location of QTLs for acidity variation in a large apple breeding program and ascertain the quantitative effects and breeding relevance of QTL allelic combinations at harvest and after commercially relevant periods of cold storage. Pedigree-connected germplasm of 16 full-sib families representing nine important breeding parents, genotyped for the 8K SNP array, was assessed for titratable acidity at harvest and after 10- and 20-week storage treatments, for three successive seasons. Using pedigree-based QTL mapping software, FlexQTL™, evidence was found for only two QTLs, on linkage groups 16 (the reported Ma locus) and LG 8 (here called Ma3) that jointly explained 66 ± 5% of the phenotypic variation. An additive allele dosage model for the two QTLs effectively explained most acidity variation, with an average of + 1.8 mg/L at harvest per high-acidity allele. The more high-acidity alleles, the faster the depletion with storage, with all combinations appearing to eventually converge to a common baseline. All parent cultivars and selections had one or two of the four possible high-acidity alleles. Each QTL had a rare second high-acidity allele with stronger or reduced effect. Diagnostic SNP markers were identified for QTL alleles derived from distinct sources. Combined QTL effects highlighted utility of the DNA-based information in new cultivar development for targeting desired fruit acidity levels before or after storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two acidity QTLs were found on linkage groups 16 and 8 in apple breeding families.

Gene
Ma locuse0
Outcome
only two QTLse0
Value
two QTLse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“evidence was found for only two QTLs, on linkage groups 16 (the reported Ma locus) and LG 8 (here called Ma3) that jointly explained 66 ± 5% of the phenotypic variation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–954 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two apple acidity QTLs jointly explained 66 ± 5% of phenotypic variation.

Gene
Ma3e0
Outcome
phenotypic variatione0
Value
66 ± 5%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“the reported Ma locus) and LG 8 (here called Ma3) that jointly explained 66 ± 5% of the phenotypic variation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–954 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An additive dosage model explained most apple acidity variation.

Gene
two QTLse0
Outcome
acidity variatione0
Value
+ 1.8 mg/Le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“An additive allele dosage model for the two QTLs effectively explained most acidity variation, with an average of + 1.8 mg/L at harvest per high-acidity allele.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each high-acidity allele increased apple fruit acidity by an average of 1.8 mg/L at harvest.

Material
high-acidity allelee0
Organ / stage
at harveste0
Outcome
aciditye0
Direction
+ e0
Value
+ 1.8 mg/Le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“with an average of + 1.8 mg/L at harvest per high-acidity allele.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More high-acidity alleles were associated with faster acidity depletion during storage.

Material
high-acidity allelese0
Outcome
depletion with storagee0
Direction
fastere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The more high-acidity alleles, the faster the depletion with storage, with all combinations appearing to eventually converge to a common baseline.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All allele combinations appeared to converge toward a common acidity baseline with storage.

Outcome
converge to a common baselinee0
Qualifier
appearing to eventuallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“with all combinations appearing to eventually converge to a common baseline.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Every parent cultivar and selection carried one or two of four possible high-acidity alleles.

Material
parent cultivars and selectionse0
Outcome
high-acidity allelese0
Value
one or two of the four possible high-acidity allelese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“All parent cultivars and selections had one or two of the four possible high-acidity alleles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1356 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each acidity QTL had a rare second high-acidity allele with a different effect.

Material
rare second high-acidity allelee0
Outcome
stronger or reduced effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Each QTL had a rare second high-acidity allele with stronger or reduced effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1436 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Diagnostic SNP markers were identified for QTL alleles from distinct sources.

Gene
QTL allelese0
Outcome
Diagnostic SNP markerse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Diagnostic SNP markers were identified for QTL alleles derived from distinct sources.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1522 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Combined QTL effects showed potential for DNA based targeting of desired apple acidity in new cultivars.

Outcome
targeting desired fruit acidity levels before or after storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Combined QTL effects highlighted utility of the DNA-based information in new cultivar development for targeting desired fruit acidity levels before or after storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1688 · show in text ↑