Paper · 1989

Evaluation of the effectiveness of Rhizobium leguminosarum strains for pea under field conditions

Louise M. Nelson; C. van Kessel

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

One hundred and eight isolates of Rhizobium leguminosarum were screened for effectiveness for pea under controlled environments. Eight superior strains plus the commercially available pea inoculants, Nitragin 'C', Grip-Inotec, and Rhizogen were tested at Waldheim and Brooksby for effectiveness with Tipu and Trapper pea as host plants. The experiment was a RCBD, laid out as a split plot with the two pea varieties as main plot treatments and rhizobia! strain as the subplot treatments, replicated four times. At Waldheim total dry matter ranged from 2429 kg/ha for uninoculated Trapper to 4024 kg/ha for Tipu inoculated with strain 128C79. Grain yield ranged from 1046 kg/ha for Trapper inoculated with strain 175G3 to 1665 kg/ha for Tipu inoculated with strain 175G3. Total grain-N ranged from 33.7 kg/ha for uninoculated Tipu to 55.5 kg/ha for. Trapper inoculated with strain 128C56G. At this site, strain 175G3 appears to be a superior strain for Tipu but is the least effective strain tested for Trapper. At Brooks by, no significant differences due to strain or cultivar were observed. Values for total dry matter, grain yield, and total N were around 75 % of those values found at Waldheim. A survey to assess nodulation was carried out and all uninoculated pea were nodulated. This would indicate the presence of indigenous R. leguminosarum nodulating pea or possible cross contamination from adjacent plots. The below average yield and the absence of a yield response due to inoculation can largely be attributed to the extreme dry weather occurring at both sites. Nodulation of the uninoculated control has also reduced the effect of inoculation on yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Waldheim, Trapper without inoculation had 2429 kg/ha total dry matter.

Taxon
Trappere0
Material
Trappere0
Treatment
uninoculatede0
Outcome
total dry mattere0
Value
2429 kg/hae0
Setting
Waldheime0

Verbatim

e0

“At Waldheim total dry matter ranged from 2429 kg/ha for uninoculated Trapper to 4024 kg/ha for Tipu inoculated with strain 128C79.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–641 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Waldheim, Tipu inoculated with strain 128C79 had 4024 kg/ha total dry matter.

Taxon
Tipue0
Material
Tipue0
Treatment
inoculated with strain 128C79e0
Outcome
total dry mattere0
Value
4024 kg/hae0
Setting
Waldheime0

Verbatim

e0

“At Waldheim total dry matter ranged from 2429 kg/ha for uninoculated Trapper to 4024 kg/ha for Tipu inoculated with strain 128C79.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–641 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Waldheim, Trapper inoculated with strain 175G3 yielded 1046 kg/ha grain.

Taxon
Trappere0
Material
Trappere0
Treatment
inoculated with strain 175G3e0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Value
1046 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield ranged from 1046 kg/ha for Trapper inoculated with strain 175G3 to 1665 kg/ha for Tipu inoculated with strain 175G3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–770 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Waldheim, Tipu inoculated with strain 175G3 yielded 1665 kg/ha grain.

Taxon
Tipue0
Material
Tipue0
Treatment
inoculated with strain 175G3e0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Value
1665 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield ranged from 1046 kg/ha for Trapper inoculated with strain 175G3 to 1665 kg/ha for Tipu inoculated with strain 175G3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–770 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Waldheim, uninoculated Tipu had 33.7 kg/ha total grain nitrogen.

Taxon
Tipue0
Material
Tipue0
Treatment
uninoculatede0
Outcome
Total grain-Ne0
Value
33.7 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Total grain-N ranged from 33.7 kg/ha for uninoculated Tipu to 55.5 kg/ha for. Trapper inoculated with strain 128C56G.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–888 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Waldheim, Trapper inoculated with strain 128C56G had 55.5 kg/ha total grain nitrogen.

Taxon
Trappere0
Material
Trappere0
Treatment
inoculated with strain 128C56Ge0
Outcome
Total grain-Ne0
Value
55.5 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Total grain-N ranged from 33.7 kg/ha for uninoculated Tipu to 55.5 kg/ha for. Trapper inoculated with strain 128C56G.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–888 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain 175G3 appeared superior for Tipu at Waldheim.

Taxon
Tipue0
Material
Tipue0
Treatment
strain 175G3e0
Outcome
superior straine0
Direction
superiore0

Verbatim

e0

“At this site, strain 175G3 appears to be a superior strain for Tipu but is the least effective strain tested for Trapper.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1010 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain 175G3 was least effective for Trapper at Waldheim.

Taxon
Trappere0
Material
Trappere0
Treatment
strain 175G3e0
Outcome
least effective straine0
Direction
least effectivee0

Verbatim

e0

“At this site, strain 175G3 appears to be a superior strain for Tipu but is the least effective strain tested for Trapper.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1010 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At Brooksby, strain and cultivar did not produce significant differences.

Outcome
differences due to strain or cultivare0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At Brooks by, no significant differences due to strain or cultivar were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1092 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Brooksby, total dry matter, grain yield, and total nitrogen were about 75% of Waldheim values.

Outcome
total dry matter, grain yield, and total Ne0
Value
75 %e0
Comparator
Waldheime0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Values for total dry matter, grain yield, and total N were around 75 % of those values found at Waldheim.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1198 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All uninoculated pea were nodulated.

Treatment
uninoculatede0
Outcome
nodulatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all uninoculated pea were nodulated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1285 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed below average yield and absent inoculation yield response largely to extreme dry weather.

Outcome
below average yield and the absence of a yield responsee0
Qualifier
extreme dry weather occurring at both sitese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The below average yield and the absence of a yield response due to inoculation can largely be attributed to the extreme dry weather occurring at both sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1574 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodulation of uninoculated controls reduced the inoculation effect on yield.

Outcome
effect of inoculation on yielde0
Qualifier
Nodulation of the uninoculated controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Nodulation of the uninoculated control has also reduced the effect of inoculation on yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1666 · show in text ↑