Abstract
The field experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design with three replications. The treatments comprised of three varieties of oat (Kent, JHO 822, JHO 851) as the main plot treatments and nine integrated nutrient management viz., 50 % of Recommended dose of Fertilizer (RDF) (F1), 75 % of RDF (F2), 100 % of RDF (F3), 50 % of RDF + Vermi Compost (F4), 50 % of RDF + Azotobactor (F5), 50 % of RDF + Vermi Compost + Azotobactor (F6), 75 % of RDF + Vermi Compost (F7), 75 % of RDF + Azotobactor (F8) and 75 % of RDF + VermiCompost + Azotobactor (F9) as the sub plot treatments. The growth parameters of oat crop like plant height, leaf area index and dry matter accumulation plant-1 were in general increased in all the treatments with the successive growth stages. The integrated nutrient management with application of proved most beneficial in enhancing all these growth parameters of oat crops. Green fodder and dry matter production were increased significantly up to (456.33 and 466.78 q ha-1) and (97.01 and 98.79 q ha-1) respectively, with the application of 75 % of RDF + Vermi Compost + Azotobactor during both the years. The quality of fodder with respect to integrated nutrient management in plant in terms of protein content improved significantly due to application of 75 % of RDF + Vermi Compost + Azotobactor during both the years.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Plant height, leaf area index and dry matter accumulation of oat increased in all treatments across successive growth stages.
- Taxon
- oat
Avena sativae0 - Organ / stage
- successive growth stagese0
- Outcome
- plant height, leaf area index and dry matter accumulation plant-1e0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The growth parameters of oat crop like plant height, leaf area index and dry matter accumulation plant-1 were in general increased in all the treatments with the successive growth stages”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient management was most beneficial in enhancing the growth parameters of oat.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae1
- Treatment
- integrated nutrient managemente1
- Outcome
- growth parameterse1
- Direction
- enhancinge1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The integrated nutrient management with application of proved most beneficial in enhancing all these growth parameters of oat crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Green fodder yield of oat increased significantly, to 456.33 and 466.78 q ha-1, with 75 % of RDF + Vermi Compost + Azotobactor.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- 75 % of RDF + Vermi Compost + Azotobactore2
- Outcome
- Green foddere2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 456.33 and 466.78 q ha-1e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The growth parameters of oat crop like plant height, leaf area index and dry matter accumulation plant-1 were in general increased in all the treatments with the successive growth stages”
e2“Green fodder and dry matter production were increased significantly up to (456.33 and 466.78 q ha-1) and (97.01 and 98.79 q ha-1) respectively, with the application of 75 % of RDF + Vermi Compost + Azotobactor during both the years”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry matter production of oat increased significantly, to 97.01 and 98.79 q ha-1, with 75 % of RDF + Vermi Compost + Azotobactor.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- 75 % of RDF + Vermi Compost + Azotobactore2
- Outcome
- dry matter productione2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 97.01 and 98.79 q ha-1e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The growth parameters of oat crop like plant height, leaf area index and dry matter accumulation plant-1 were in general increased in all the treatments with the successive growth stages”
e2“Green fodder and dry matter production were increased significantly up to (456.33 and 466.78 q ha-1) and (97.01 and 98.79 q ha-1) respectively, with the application of 75 % of RDF + Vermi Compost + Azotobactor during both the years”
Claim · model-written summary
Protein content of oat fodder improved significantly with 75 % of RDF + Vermi Compost + Azotobactor.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- 75 % of RDF + Vermi Compost + Azotobactore3
- Outcome
- protein contente3
- Direction
- improvede3
Not reportedComparatorValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The growth parameters of oat crop like plant height, leaf area index and dry matter accumulation plant-1 were in general increased in all the treatments with the successive growth stages”
e3“The quality of fodder with respect to integrated nutrient management in plant in terms of protein content improved significantly due to application of 75 % of RDF + Vermi Compost + Azotobactor during both the years”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →fertilization · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ
43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →fertilization · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
156 papers more in this group
See all 160 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.