Abstract
A field study was conducted during the late cropping seasons of 2015 and 2016 at Akamkpa (latitude 5°15' N and longitude 8°22'E), southern Nigeria, to evaluate the response of some legume genotypes to seed inoculation with NoduMax, a Rhizobium inoculant developed by the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Treatments were factorial combinations of inoculated and non-inoculated seeds of Cowpea, Groundnut, Bambara groundnut, Bebi (Viny Lima) bean, Mucuna bean, and African yam bean, laid out in randomized complete block design replicated thrice. The response of the test crops to inoculation varied with growth stage. At the seedling stage, effective nodule number was not significantly affected in all but Mucuna bean in which there was a 42.7% reduction. At pre-an thesis, Bambara groundnut, Bebi bean, Groundnut, and Cowpea recorded a statistically similar number of nodules(p=0.05) under inoculated and non-inoculated conditions, but inoculation reduced nodule formation in Mucuna bean and African yam bean by 22.4 and 20.4%, respectively. Nodule dry weight of Bebi bean, Bambara groundnut, Mucuna bean and Cowpea was unaffected by inoculation when assessed at the seedling and pre-anthesis growth stages, but that of Groundnut was reduced by 35, and African yam bean increased by 60%, respectively. Inoculation increased the nodule dry weight of African yam bean and Mucuna bean by 56.5 and 60.6% at seed initiation stage, and reduced that of Bambara groundnut and Groundnut by 25.6 and 50.0%, respectively. The effect of genotype í— inoculation interaction on plant biomass and fresh grain yield was significant; whereas inoculation significantly increased the yield of Cowpea from 2,471 to 2,794 kg/ha and 2,995 to 3504 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively, it did not significantly affect that of Bebi bean, African yam bean and Bambara groundnut. On the contrary, the yield of groundnut was reduced from 884 to 560 kg/ha and 963 to 678 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Inoculation with NoduMax was beneficial to cowpea, but did not significantly improve the performance of Bebi bean, and Groundnut. It could be that Bebi bean is promiscuous and better adapted to the native strains of Rhizobium, while the Rhizobium in Groundnut is antagonistic and incompatible with the introduced inoculants. Binang et al.; JALSI, 11(4): 1-9, 2017; Articleno.JALSI.32624 2 recorded a statistically similar number of nodules (p=0.05) under inoculated and non-inoculated conditions, but inoculation reduced nodule formation in Mucuna bean and African yam bean by 22.4 and 20.4%, respectively. Nodule dry weight of Bebi bean, Bambara groundnut, Mucuna bean and Cowpea was unaffected by inoculation when assessed at the seedling and pre-anthesis growth stages, but that of Groundnut was reduced by 35, and African yam bean increased by 60%, respectively. Inoculation increased the nodule dry weight of African yam bean and Mucuna bean by 56.5 and 60.6% at seed initiation stage, and reduced that of Bambara groundnut and Groundnut by 25.6 and 50.0%, respectively. The effect of genotype í— inoculation interaction on plant biomass and fresh grain yield was significant; whereas inoculation significantly increased the yield of Cowpea from 2,471 to 2,794 kg/ha and 2,995 to 3504 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively, it did not significantly affect that of Bebi bean, African yam bean and Bambara groundnut. On the contrary, the yield of groundnut was reduced from 884 to 560 kg/ha and 963 to 678 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Inoculation with NoduMax was beneficial to cowpea, but did not significantly improve the performance of Bebi bean, and Groundnut. It could be that Bebi bean is promiscuous and better adapted to the native strains of Rhizobium, while the Rhizobium in Groundnut is antagonistic and incompatible with the introduced inoculants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
Mucuna bean had a 42.7% reduction in effective nodule number at the seedling stage when inoculated.
- Taxon
- Mucuna beane1
- Organ / stage
- seedling stagee1
- Treatment
- inoculatede2
- Outcome
- effective nodule numbere1
- Direction
- reductione1
- Value
- 42.7%e1
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“Rhizobium”
e2“Treatments were factorial combinations of inoculated and non-inoculated seeds of Cowpea, Groundnut, Bambara groundnut, Bebi (Viny Lima) bean, Mucuna bean, and African yam bean, laid out in randomized complete block design replicated thrice.”
e1“At the seedling stage, effective nodule number was not significantly affected in all but Mucuna bean in which there was a 42.7% reduction.”
Claim · model-written summary
At the seedling stage, effective nodule number of the other indigenous legumes was not significantly affected by inoculation.
- Taxon
- Indigenous Legumest0
- Organ / stage
- seedling stagee1
- Treatment
- inoculatede2
- Outcome
- effective nodule numbere1
- Direction
- not significantly affectede1
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Indigenous Legumes”
t1“Rhizobium”
e2“Treatments were factorial combinations of inoculated and non-inoculated seeds of Cowpea, Groundnut, Bambara groundnut, Bebi (Viny Lima) bean, Mucuna bean, and African yam bean, laid out in randomized complete block design replicated thrice.”
e1“At the seedling stage, effective nodule number was not significantly affected in all but Mucuna bean in which there was a 42.7% reduction.”
Claim · model-written summary
At pre-anthesis, nodule number of Bambara groundnut, Bebi bean, groundnut and cowpea was statistically similar with and without inoculation.
- Taxon
- Indigenous Legumest0
- Organ / stage
- pre-anthesis growth stagese3
- Treatment
- inoculatede3
- Outcome
- number of nodulese3
- Direction
- statistically similare3
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Indigenous Legumes”
t1“Rhizobium”
e3“At pre-an thesis, Bambara groundnut, Bebi bean, Groundnut, and Cowpea recorded a statistically similar number of nodules(p=0.05) under inoculated and non-inoculated conditions, but inoculation reduced nodule formation in Mucuna bean and African yam bean by 22.4 and 20.4%, respectively. Nodule dry weight of Bebi bean, Bambara groundnut, Mucuna bean and Cowpea was unaffected by inoculation when assessed at the seedling and pre-anthesis growth stages, but that of Groundnut was reduced by 35, and African yam bean increased by 60%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
At pre-anthesis, inoculation reduced nodule number of Mucuna bean by 22.4%.
- Taxon
- Mucuna beane3
- Organ / stage
- pre-anthesis growth stagese3
- Treatment
- inoculatione3
- Outcome
- nodule formatione3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Value
- 22.4e3
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“Rhizobium”
e3“At pre-an thesis, Bambara groundnut, Bebi bean, Groundnut, and Cowpea recorded a statistically similar number of nodules(p=0.05) under inoculated and non-inoculated conditions, but inoculation reduced nodule formation in Mucuna bean and African yam bean by 22.4 and 20.4%, respectively. Nodule dry weight of Bebi bean, Bambara groundnut, Mucuna bean and Cowpea was unaffected by inoculation when assessed at the seedling and pre-anthesis growth stages, but that of Groundnut was reduced by 35, and African yam bean increased by 60%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
At pre-anthesis, inoculation reduced nodule number of African yam bean by 20.4%.
- Taxon
- African yam bean
Sphenostylis stenocarpae3 - Organ / stage
- pre-anthesis growth stagese3
- Treatment
- inoculatione3
- Outcome
- nodule formatione3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Value
- 20.4%e3
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t1“Rhizobium”
e3“At pre-an thesis, Bambara groundnut, Bebi bean, Groundnut, and Cowpea recorded a statistically similar number of nodules(p=0.05) under inoculated and non-inoculated conditions, but inoculation reduced nodule formation in Mucuna bean and African yam bean by 22.4 and 20.4%, respectively. Nodule dry weight of Bebi bean, Bambara groundnut, Mucuna bean and Cowpea was unaffected by inoculation when assessed at the seedling and pre-anthesis growth stages, but that of Groundnut was reduced by 35, and African yam bean increased by 60%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nodule dry weight of Bebi bean, Bambara groundnut, Mucuna bean and cowpea was unaffected by inoculation at the seedling and pre-anthesis stages.
- Taxon
- Indigenous Legumest0
- Organ / stage
- seedling and pre-anthesis growth stagese3
- Treatment
- inoculatione3
- Outcome
- Nodule dry weighte3
- Direction
- unaffectede3
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Indigenous Legumes”
t1“Rhizobium”
e3“At pre-an thesis, Bambara groundnut, Bebi bean, Groundnut, and Cowpea recorded a statistically similar number of nodules(p=0.05) under inoculated and non-inoculated conditions, but inoculation reduced nodule formation in Mucuna bean and African yam bean by 22.4 and 20.4%, respectively. Nodule dry weight of Bebi bean, Bambara groundnut, Mucuna bean and Cowpea was unaffected by inoculation when assessed at the seedling and pre-anthesis growth stages, but that of Groundnut was reduced by 35, and African yam bean increased by 60%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
At the pre-anthesis stage, inoculation reduced nodule dry weight of groundnut by 35.
- Taxon
- Groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae3 - Treatment
- inoculatione3
- Outcome
- Nodule dry weighte3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Value
- 35e3
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t1“Rhizobium”
e3“At pre-an thesis, Bambara groundnut, Bebi bean, Groundnut, and Cowpea recorded a statistically similar number of nodules(p=0.05) under inoculated and non-inoculated conditions, but inoculation reduced nodule formation in Mucuna bean and African yam bean by 22.4 and 20.4%, respectively. Nodule dry weight of Bebi bean, Bambara groundnut, Mucuna bean and Cowpea was unaffected by inoculation when assessed at the seedling and pre-anthesis growth stages, but that of Groundnut was reduced by 35, and African yam bean increased by 60%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation increased nodule dry weight of African yam bean by 60%.
- Taxon
- African yam bean
Sphenostylis stenocarpae3 - Treatment
- inoculatione3
- Outcome
- Nodule dry weighte3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 60%e3
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t1“Rhizobium”
e3“At pre-an thesis, Bambara groundnut, Bebi bean, Groundnut, and Cowpea recorded a statistically similar number of nodules(p=0.05) under inoculated and non-inoculated conditions, but inoculation reduced nodule formation in Mucuna bean and African yam bean by 22.4 and 20.4%, respectively. Nodule dry weight of Bebi bean, Bambara groundnut, Mucuna bean and Cowpea was unaffected by inoculation when assessed at the seedling and pre-anthesis growth stages, but that of Groundnut was reduced by 35, and African yam bean increased by 60%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
At seed initiation, inoculation increased nodule dry weight of African yam bean by 56.5.
- Taxon
- African yam bean
Sphenostylis stenocarpae4 - Organ / stage
- seed initiation stagee4
- Treatment
- Inoculatione4
- Outcome
- nodule dry weighte4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 56.5e4
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t1“Rhizobium”
e4“At pre-an thesis, Bambara groundnut, Bebi bean, Groundnut, and Cowpea recorded a statistically similar number of nodules(p=0.05) under inoculated and non-inoculated conditions, but inoculation reduced nodule formation in Mucuna bean and African yam bean by 22.4 and 20.4%, respectively. Nodule dry weight of Bebi bean, Bambara groundnut, Mucuna bean and Cowpea was unaffected by inoculation when assessed at the seedling and pre-anthesis growth stages, but that of Groundnut was reduced by 35, and African yam bean increased by 60%, respectively. Inoculation increased the nodule dry weight of African yam bean and Mucuna bean by 56.5 and 60.6% at seed initiation stage, and reduced that of Bambara groundnut and Groundnut by 25.6 and 50.0%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
At seed initiation, inoculation increased nodule dry weight of Mucuna bean by 60.6%.
- Taxon
- Mucuna beane4
- Organ / stage
- seed initiation stagee4
- Treatment
- Inoculatione4
- Outcome
- nodule dry weighte4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 60.6%e4
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“Rhizobium”
e4“At pre-an thesis, Bambara groundnut, Bebi bean, Groundnut, and Cowpea recorded a statistically similar number of nodules(p=0.05) under inoculated and non-inoculated conditions, but inoculation reduced nodule formation in Mucuna bean and African yam bean by 22.4 and 20.4%, respectively. Nodule dry weight of Bebi bean, Bambara groundnut, Mucuna bean and Cowpea was unaffected by inoculation when assessed at the seedling and pre-anthesis growth stages, but that of Groundnut was reduced by 35, and African yam bean increased by 60%, respectively. Inoculation increased the nodule dry weight of African yam bean and Mucuna bean by 56.5 and 60.6% at seed initiation stage, and reduced that of Bambara groundnut and Groundnut by 25.6 and 50.0%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
At seed initiation, inoculation reduced nodule dry weight of Bambara groundnut by 25.6%.
- Taxon
- Bambara groundnut
Vigna subterraneae4 - Organ / stage
- seed initiation stagee4
- Treatment
- Inoculatione4
- Outcome
- nodule dry weighte4
- Direction
- reducede4
- Value
- 25.6e4
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t1“Rhizobium”
e4“At pre-an thesis, Bambara groundnut, Bebi bean, Groundnut, and Cowpea recorded a statistically similar number of nodules(p=0.05) under inoculated and non-inoculated conditions, but inoculation reduced nodule formation in Mucuna bean and African yam bean by 22.4 and 20.4%, respectively. Nodule dry weight of Bebi bean, Bambara groundnut, Mucuna bean and Cowpea was unaffected by inoculation when assessed at the seedling and pre-anthesis growth stages, but that of Groundnut was reduced by 35, and African yam bean increased by 60%, respectively. Inoculation increased the nodule dry weight of African yam bean and Mucuna bean by 56.5 and 60.6% at seed initiation stage, and reduced that of Bambara groundnut and Groundnut by 25.6 and 50.0%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
At seed initiation, inoculation reduced nodule dry weight of groundnut by 50.0%.
- Taxon
- Groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae4 - Organ / stage
- seed initiation stagee4
- Treatment
- Inoculatione4
- Outcome
- nodule dry weighte4
- Direction
- reducede4
- Value
- 50.0%e4
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t1“Rhizobium”
e4“At pre-an thesis, Bambara groundnut, Bebi bean, Groundnut, and Cowpea recorded a statistically similar number of nodules(p=0.05) under inoculated and non-inoculated conditions, but inoculation reduced nodule formation in Mucuna bean and African yam bean by 22.4 and 20.4%, respectively. Nodule dry weight of Bebi bean, Bambara groundnut, Mucuna bean and Cowpea was unaffected by inoculation when assessed at the seedling and pre-anthesis growth stages, but that of Groundnut was reduced by 35, and African yam bean increased by 60%, respectively. Inoculation increased the nodule dry weight of African yam bean and Mucuna bean by 56.5 and 60.6% at seed initiation stage, and reduced that of Bambara groundnut and Groundnut by 25.6 and 50.0%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation increased grain yield of cowpea from 2,471 to 2,794 kg/ha in 2015.
- Taxon
- Cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae5 - Treatment
- Inoculatione5
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Value
- 2,471 to 2,794 kg/hae5
- Qualifier
- 2015e5
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t1“Rhizobium”
e2“Treatments were factorial combinations of inoculated and non-inoculated seeds of Cowpea, Groundnut, Bambara groundnut, Bebi (Viny Lima) bean, Mucuna bean, and African yam bean, laid out in randomized complete block design replicated thrice.”
e5“whereas inoculation significantly increased the yield of Cowpea from 2,471 to 2,794 kg/ha and 2,995 to 3504 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively, it did not significantly affect that of Bebi bean, African yam bean and Bambara groundnut. On the contrary, the yield of groundnut was reduced from 884 to 560 kg/ha and 963 to 678 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Inoculation with NoduMax was beneficial to cowpea, but did not significantly improve the performance of Bebi bean, and Groundnut. It could be that Bebi bean is promiscuous and better adapted to the native strains of Rhizobium, while the Rhizobium in Groundnut is antagonistic and incompatible with the introduced inoculants. Binang”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation increased grain yield of cowpea from 2,995 to 3504 kg/ha in 2016.
- Taxon
- Cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae5 - Treatment
- Inoculatione5
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Value
- 2,995 to 3504 kg/hae5
- Qualifier
- 2016e5
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t1“Rhizobium”
e2“Treatments were factorial combinations of inoculated and non-inoculated seeds of Cowpea, Groundnut, Bambara groundnut, Bebi (Viny Lima) bean, Mucuna bean, and African yam bean, laid out in randomized complete block design replicated thrice.”
e5“whereas inoculation significantly increased the yield of Cowpea from 2,471 to 2,794 kg/ha and 2,995 to 3504 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively, it did not significantly affect that of Bebi bean, African yam bean and Bambara groundnut. On the contrary, the yield of groundnut was reduced from 884 to 560 kg/ha and 963 to 678 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Inoculation with NoduMax was beneficial to cowpea, but did not significantly improve the performance of Bebi bean, and Groundnut. It could be that Bebi bean is promiscuous and better adapted to the native strains of Rhizobium, while the Rhizobium in Groundnut is antagonistic and incompatible with the introduced inoculants. Binang”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation reduced grain yield of groundnut from 884 to 560 kg/ha in 2015.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae5 - Treatment
- Inoculatione5
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- reducede5
- Value
- 884 to 560 kg/hae5
- Qualifier
- 2015e5
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t1“Rhizobium”
e2“Treatments were factorial combinations of inoculated and non-inoculated seeds of Cowpea, Groundnut, Bambara groundnut, Bebi (Viny Lima) bean, Mucuna bean, and African yam bean, laid out in randomized complete block design replicated thrice.”
e5“whereas inoculation significantly increased the yield of Cowpea from 2,471 to 2,794 kg/ha and 2,995 to 3504 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively, it did not significantly affect that of Bebi bean, African yam bean and Bambara groundnut. On the contrary, the yield of groundnut was reduced from 884 to 560 kg/ha and 963 to 678 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Inoculation with NoduMax was beneficial to cowpea, but did not significantly improve the performance of Bebi bean, and Groundnut. It could be that Bebi bean is promiscuous and better adapted to the native strains of Rhizobium, while the Rhizobium in Groundnut is antagonistic and incompatible with the introduced inoculants. Binang”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation reduced grain yield of groundnut from 963 to 678 kg/ha in 2016.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae5 - Treatment
- Inoculatione5
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- reducede5
- Value
- 963 to 678 kg/hae5
- Qualifier
- 2016e5
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t1“Rhizobium”
e2“Treatments were factorial combinations of inoculated and non-inoculated seeds of Cowpea, Groundnut, Bambara groundnut, Bebi (Viny Lima) bean, Mucuna bean, and African yam bean, laid out in randomized complete block design replicated thrice.”
e5“whereas inoculation significantly increased the yield of Cowpea from 2,471 to 2,794 kg/ha and 2,995 to 3504 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively, it did not significantly affect that of Bebi bean, African yam bean and Bambara groundnut. On the contrary, the yield of groundnut was reduced from 884 to 560 kg/ha and 963 to 678 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Inoculation with NoduMax was beneficial to cowpea, but did not significantly improve the performance of Bebi bean, and Groundnut. It could be that Bebi bean is promiscuous and better adapted to the native strains of Rhizobium, while the Rhizobium in Groundnut is antagonistic and incompatible with the introduced inoculants. Binang”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation did not significantly affect grain yield of Bebi bean, African yam bean and Bambara groundnut.
- Taxon
- Bebi bean, African yam bean and Bambara groundnute5
- Treatment
- Inoculatione5
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- did not significantly affecte5
- Comparator
- non-inoculatede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“Rhizobium”
e2“Treatments were factorial combinations of inoculated and non-inoculated seeds of Cowpea, Groundnut, Bambara groundnut, Bebi (Viny Lima) bean, Mucuna bean, and African yam bean, laid out in randomized complete block design replicated thrice.”
e5“whereas inoculation significantly increased the yield of Cowpea from 2,471 to 2,794 kg/ha and 2,995 to 3504 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively, it did not significantly affect that of Bebi bean, African yam bean and Bambara groundnut. On the contrary, the yield of groundnut was reduced from 884 to 560 kg/ha and 963 to 678 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Inoculation with NoduMax was beneficial to cowpea, but did not significantly improve the performance of Bebi bean, and Groundnut. It could be that Bebi bean is promiscuous and better adapted to the native strains of Rhizobium, while the Rhizobium in Groundnut is antagonistic and incompatible with the introduced inoculants. Binang”
Claim · model-written summary
The genotype by inoculation interaction significantly affected plant biomass and fresh grain yield.
- Taxon
- Indigenous Legumest0
- Treatment
- genotype í— inoculation interactione6
- Outcome
- plant biomass and fresh grain yielde6
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Indigenous Legumes”
t1“Rhizobium”
e6“The effect of genotype í— inoculation interaction on plant biomass and fresh grain yield was significant; whereas inoculation significantly increased the yield of Cowpea from 2,471 to 2,794 kg/ha and 2,995 to 3504 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively, it did not significantly affect that of Bebi bean, African yam bean and Bambara groundnut. On the contrary, the yield of groundnut was reduced from 884 to 560 kg/ha and 963 to 678 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Inoculation with NoduMax was beneficial to cowpea, but did not significantly improve the performance of Bebi bean, and Groundnut. It could be that Bebi bean is promiscuous and better adapted to the native strains of Rhizobium, while the Rhizobium in Groundnut is antagonistic and incompatible with the introduced inoculants. Binang”
Claim · model-written summary
Bebi bean is promiscuous and better adapted to native Rhizobium strains, which may explain its lack of response to inoculation.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t1“Rhizobium”
e6“The effect of genotype í— inoculation interaction on plant biomass and fresh grain yield was significant; whereas inoculation significantly increased the yield of Cowpea from 2,471 to 2,794 kg/ha and 2,995 to 3504 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively, it did not significantly affect that of Bebi bean, African yam bean and Bambara groundnut. On the contrary, the yield of groundnut was reduced from 884 to 560 kg/ha and 963 to 678 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Inoculation with NoduMax was beneficial to cowpea, but did not significantly improve the performance of Bebi bean, and Groundnut. It could be that Bebi bean is promiscuous and better adapted to the native strains of Rhizobium, while the Rhizobium in Groundnut is antagonistic and incompatible with the introduced inoculants. Binang”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium in groundnut may be antagonistic and incompatible with the introduced inoculant.
- Taxon
- Groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae6 - Outcome
- antagonistic and incompatiblee6
- Qualifier
- with the introduced inoculantse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t1“Rhizobium”
e6“The effect of genotype í— inoculation interaction on plant biomass and fresh grain yield was significant; whereas inoculation significantly increased the yield of Cowpea from 2,471 to 2,794 kg/ha and 2,995 to 3504 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively, it did not significantly affect that of Bebi bean, African yam bean and Bambara groundnut. On the contrary, the yield of groundnut was reduced from 884 to 560 kg/ha and 963 to 678 kg/ha in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Inoculation with NoduMax was beneficial to cowpea, but did not significantly improve the performance of Bebi bean, and Groundnut. It could be that Bebi bean is promiscuous and better adapted to the native strains of Rhizobium, while the Rhizobium in Groundnut is antagonistic and incompatible with the introduced inoculants. Binang”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · Rhizobium · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →inoculation · Rhizobium · Vigna subterranea (Bambara groundnut)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
inoculation · Rhizobium · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.