Abstract
The present study deals with the isolation and characterization of Azotobacter vinelandii and A pots experiment was conducted at the canopy wood of Agriculture-University of Al-Muthanna (station 2) during winter season of 2016–2017 to study the effect of inoculant bacterial and irrigation water quality and their interactions on yield and growth of wheat. Treatments included four levels of inoculant bacterial (without inoculation A0 and inoculation with three locally Azotobacter vinelandii coded A1, A2A3 and three water qualities river water (0.752 ds.m−1 W0), mixed water (3.6 ds.m−1 W1) and drainage water (6.5 ds.m−1 W2). The results showed, generally bacterial inoculant treatments was superior to the un-inoculant treatment A0 in most character studied and A2 treatment achieved best result compared with other isolation locally, in height plant, dry weight plant, weight of 1000 seeds, yield and nitrogen uptake) was recorded (99.10 cm, 15.50 g plant−1, 29.29 g, 32.95 g plant−1, 73.56 mg plant−1) sequentially. Generally increasing salinity in irrigation water significantly decreased growth characters, yield, and yield components of plant. Interaction between biofertilizer treatments and salinity had a significant effect on plant growth and yield and yield components of plant and the best result were had been gave by A2W0 in all traits studied (height plant, dry weight plant, weight of 1000 seeds, yield and nitrogen uptake) which was recorded (106.88cm, 17.97g plant−1, 30.34g, 39.34g plant−1, 97.43mg plant−1) respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
A2 inoculation gave the best height plant, 99.10 cm.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- A2 treatmente0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter vinelandiiAzotobacter vinelandiie1symbiont
- Outcome
- height plante0
- Direction
- best resulte0
- Value
- 99.10 cme0
- Comparator
- other isolation locallye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed, generally bacterial inoculant treatments was superior to the un-inoculant treatment A0 in most character studied and A2 treatment achieved best result compared with other isolation locally, in height plant, dry weight plant, weight of 1000 seeds, yield and nitrogen uptake) was recorded (99.10 cm, 15.50 g plant−1, 29.29 g, 32.95 g plant−1, 73.56 mg plant−1) sequentially.”
e1“isolation and characterization of Azotobacter vinelandii”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
A2 inoculation gave the best dry weight plant, 15.50 g plant−1.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- A2 treatmente0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter vinelandiiAzotobacter vinelandiie1symbiont
- Outcome
- dry weight plante0
- Direction
- best resulte0
- Value
- 15.50 g plant−1e0
- Comparator
- other isolation locallye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed, generally bacterial inoculant treatments was superior to the un-inoculant treatment A0 in most character studied and A2 treatment achieved best result compared with other isolation locally, in height plant, dry weight plant, weight of 1000 seeds, yield and nitrogen uptake) was recorded (99.10 cm, 15.50 g plant−1, 29.29 g, 32.95 g plant−1, 73.56 mg plant−1) sequentially.”
e1“isolation and characterization of Azotobacter vinelandii”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
A2 inoculation gave the best weight of 1000 seeds, 29.29 g.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- A2 treatmente0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter vinelandiiAzotobacter vinelandiie1symbiont
- Outcome
- weight of 1000 seedse0
- Direction
- best resulte0
- Value
- 29.29 ge0
- Comparator
- other isolation locallye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed, generally bacterial inoculant treatments was superior to the un-inoculant treatment A0 in most character studied and A2 treatment achieved best result compared with other isolation locally, in height plant, dry weight plant, weight of 1000 seeds, yield and nitrogen uptake) was recorded (99.10 cm, 15.50 g plant−1, 29.29 g, 32.95 g plant−1, 73.56 mg plant−1) sequentially.”
e1“isolation and characterization of Azotobacter vinelandii”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
A2 inoculation gave the best yield, 32.95 g plant−1.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- A2 treatmente0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter vinelandiiAzotobacter vinelandiie1symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- best resulte0
- Value
- 32.95 g plant−1e0
- Comparator
- other isolation locallye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed, generally bacterial inoculant treatments was superior to the un-inoculant treatment A0 in most character studied and A2 treatment achieved best result compared with other isolation locally, in height plant, dry weight plant, weight of 1000 seeds, yield and nitrogen uptake) was recorded (99.10 cm, 15.50 g plant−1, 29.29 g, 32.95 g plant−1, 73.56 mg plant−1) sequentially.”
e1“isolation and characterization of Azotobacter vinelandii”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
A2 inoculation gave the best nitrogen uptake, 73.56 mg plant−1.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- A2 treatmente0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter vinelandiiAzotobacter vinelandiie1symbiont
- Outcome
- nitrogen uptakee0
- Direction
- best resulte0
- Value
- 73.56 mg plant−1e0
- Comparator
- other isolation locallye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed, generally bacterial inoculant treatments was superior to the un-inoculant treatment A0 in most character studied and A2 treatment achieved best result compared with other isolation locally, in height plant, dry weight plant, weight of 1000 seeds, yield and nitrogen uptake) was recorded (99.10 cm, 15.50 g plant−1, 29.29 g, 32.95 g plant−1, 73.56 mg plant−1) sequentially.”
e1“isolation and characterization of Azotobacter vinelandii”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing irrigation-water salinity significantly reduced plant growth characters, yield and yield components.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- increasing salinity in irrigation watere0
- Outcome
- growth characters, yield, and yield components of plante0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Generally increasing salinity in irrigation water significantly decreased growth characters, yield, and yield components of plant.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
A2W0 produced the best height plant, 106.88cm.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- A2W0e0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter vinelandiiAzotobacter vinelandiie1symbiont
- Outcome
- height plante0
- Direction
- best resulte0
- Value
- 106.88cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Interaction between biofertilizer treatments and salinity had a significant effect on plant growth and yield and yield components of plant and the best result were had been gave by A2W0 in all traits studied (height plant, dry weight plant, weight of 1000 seeds, yield and nitrogen uptake) which was recorded (106.88cm, 17.97g plant−1, 30.34g, 39.34g plant−1, 97.43mg plant−1) respectively.”
e1“isolation and characterization of Azotobacter vinelandii”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
A2W0 produced the best dry weight plant, 17.97g plant−1.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- A2W0e0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter vinelandiiAzotobacter vinelandiie1symbiont
- Outcome
- dry weight plante0
- Direction
- best resulte0
- Value
- 17.97g plant−1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Interaction between biofertilizer treatments and salinity had a significant effect on plant growth and yield and yield components of plant and the best result were had been gave by A2W0 in all traits studied (height plant, dry weight plant, weight of 1000 seeds, yield and nitrogen uptake) which was recorded (106.88cm, 17.97g plant−1, 30.34g, 39.34g plant−1, 97.43mg plant−1) respectively.”
e1“isolation and characterization of Azotobacter vinelandii”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
A2W0 produced the best weight of 1000 seeds, 30.34g.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- A2W0e0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter vinelandiiAzotobacter vinelandiie1symbiont
- Outcome
- weight of 1000 seedse0
- Direction
- best resulte0
- Value
- 30.34ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Interaction between biofertilizer treatments and salinity had a significant effect on plant growth and yield and yield components of plant and the best result were had been gave by A2W0 in all traits studied (height plant, dry weight plant, weight of 1000 seeds, yield and nitrogen uptake) which was recorded (106.88cm, 17.97g plant−1, 30.34g, 39.34g plant−1, 97.43mg plant−1) respectively.”
e1“isolation and characterization of Azotobacter vinelandii”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
A2W0 produced the best yield, 39.34g plant−1.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- A2W0e0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter vinelandiiAzotobacter vinelandiie1symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- best resulte0
- Value
- 39.34g plant−1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Interaction between biofertilizer treatments and salinity had a significant effect on plant growth and yield and yield components of plant and the best result were had been gave by A2W0 in all traits studied (height plant, dry weight plant, weight of 1000 seeds, yield and nitrogen uptake) which was recorded (106.88cm, 17.97g plant−1, 30.34g, 39.34g plant−1, 97.43mg plant−1) respectively.”
e1“isolation and characterization of Azotobacter vinelandii”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
A2W0 produced the best nitrogen uptake, 97.43mg plant−1.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- A2W0e0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter vinelandiiAzotobacter vinelandiie1symbiont
- Outcome
- nitrogen uptakee0
- Direction
- best resulte0
- Value
- 97.43mg plant−1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Interaction between biofertilizer treatments and salinity had a significant effect on plant growth and yield and yield components of plant and the best result were had been gave by A2W0 in all traits studied (height plant, dry weight plant, weight of 1000 seeds, yield and nitrogen uptake) which was recorded (106.88cm, 17.97g plant−1, 30.34g, 39.34g plant−1, 97.43mg plant−1) respectively.”
e1“isolation and characterization of Azotobacter vinelandii”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 197 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
223 papers more in this group
See all 227 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.