Abstract
We compared the effects of whole-volume fertilizer application after harvesting versus conventional fertilizer application on the growth, fruit quality, and yield of 'Satonishiki' sweet cherry in Yamagata. With whole-volume fertilizer application after harvesting, the leaf colour was maintained in the year of fertilization and the number of fruits per spur and yield tended to increase in the year after fertilization. However, no differences were observed in plant growth (length and leaf size of young shoots) in the following year between the two fertilization methods. Fruit quality also showed no significant differences between the two fertilization methods.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Whole-volume fertilizer application after harvesting maintained sweet cherry leaf colour in the year of fertilization.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry
Prunus aviume2 - Material
- 'Satonishiki'e2
- Treatment
- whole-volume fertilizer application after harvestinge2
- Outcome
- leaf coloure1
- Direction
- maintainede1
- Comparator
- conventional fertilizer applicatione2
- Setting
- Yamagatae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the leaf colour was maintained in the year of fertilization”
e2“We compared the effects of whole-volume fertilizer application after harvesting versus conventional fertilizer application on the growth, fruit quality, and yield of 'Satonishiki' sweet cherry in Yamagata”
Claim · model-written summary
Whole-volume fertilizer application after harvesting tended to increase fruits per spur and yield of sweet cherry in the year after fertilization.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviume2
- Material
- 'Satonishiki'e2
- Treatment
- whole-volume fertilizer application after harvestinge2
- Outcome
- number of fruits per spur and yielde3
- Direction
- tended to increasee3
- Comparator
- conventional fertilizer applicatione2
- Setting
- Yamagatae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“the number of fruits per spur and yield tended to increase in the year after fertilization”
e2“We compared the effects of whole-volume fertilizer application after harvesting versus conventional fertilizer application on the growth, fruit quality, and yield of 'Satonishiki' sweet cherry in Yamagata”
Claim · model-written summary
No differences were observed in sweet cherry plant growth (length and leaf size of young shoots) in the following year between the two fertilization methods.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviume2
- Material
- 'Satonishiki'e2
- Treatment
- whole-volume fertilizer application after harvestinge2
- Outcome
- plant growth (length and leaf size of young shoots)e4
- Direction
- no differencese4
- Comparator
- conventional fertilizer applicatione2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“no differences were observed in plant growth (length and leaf size of young shoots) in the following year between the two fertilization methods”
e2“We compared the effects of whole-volume fertilizer application after harvesting versus conventional fertilizer application on the growth, fruit quality, and yield of 'Satonishiki' sweet cherry in Yamagata”
Claim · model-written summary
No significant differences were observed in sweet cherry fruit quality between the two fertilization methods.
- Taxon
- sweet cherryPrunus aviume2
- Material
- 'Satonishiki'e2
- Treatment
- whole-volume fertilizer application after harvestinge2
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye5
- Direction
- no significant differencese5
- Comparator
- conventional fertilizer applicatione2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Fruit quality also showed no significant differences between the two fertilization methods”
e2“We compared the effects of whole-volume fertilizer application after harvesting versus conventional fertilizer application on the growth, fruit quality, and yield of 'Satonishiki' sweet cherry in Yamagata”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: grain · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fertilization · growth · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →fertilization · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →fertilization · quality: postharvest · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.