Paper · 2019 · Helia

Induced Mutagenesis for the Creation of New Starting Material in Sunflower Breeding

V. O. Vasko; V. V. Kyrychenko

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
4
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The article colligates data of studies on the variability of quantitative and qualitative traits in mutant sunflower M 1 -M 3 generations affected by dimethyl sulfate (DMS) (0.01, 0.05 %) and gamma rays (120; 150 Gy), frequencies and range of mutations in M 2 and their inheritance in mutant families, chromosome aberrations in meiosis, as well as on the breeding and genetic value of induced mutants and possibilities of their use in breeding. The methodical peculiarities of the mutational breeding of the cross-pollinating crop were defined, and new mutants with changed features were created. Investigating new homozygous self-pollinated sunflower lines, we observed a more negative mutagenic impact of gamma irradiation (120 and 150 Gy) on the germinability of M 1 sunflower seeds in the field compared with the DMS effect (0.01 and 0.05 %). The field germinability of DMS-treated seeds was 83–87 % vs. 11–15 % of gamma-irradiated ones. The mutagenic effect of gamma rays (120 and 150 Gy) on M 1 meiosis was shown to be stronger than that of DMS (0.01 and 0.05 %). The percentage of cells with alterations varied within 15.79–18.78 % (120 Gy) and 20.38–25.26 % (150 Gy) compared to 0–0.16 % in the control. The effect of gamma rays on the frequency of morphoses in M1 was stronger, in particular, after exposure to 120 Gy or 150 Gy of gamma irradiation, the number of plants with alterations was 43 %, whereas after DMS treatment (0.01 and 0.05 %) this parameter averaged 27–28 %. We determined the inheritance of mutations of quantitative and qualitative traits, which are important for breeding, in mutant M2 families and selected mutant families with inherited altered traits that can be considered as mutations. Among the best mutations, there are morphological mutants with marker traits, mutants with increased content of oil in seeds, increased 1000-seed weight, increased contents of behenic, linoleic and palmitoleic acids as well as with absolute resistance to downy mildew.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Mutational breeding methods were defined and new sunflower mutants created.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
new mutants with changed featurese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The methodical peculiarities of the mutational breeding of the cross-pollinating crop were defined, and new mutants with changed features were created”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–604 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma irradiation reduced M1 sunflower field germination more than DMS treatment.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
gamma irradiation (120 and 150 Gy)e0
Outcome
germinability of M 1 sunflower seedse0
Direction
more negativee0
Comparator
DMS effect (0.01 and 0.05 %)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we observed a more negative mutagenic impact of gamma irradiation (120 and 150 Gy) on the germinability of M 1 sunflower seeds in the field compared with the DMS effect (0.01 and 0.05 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field germination was 83–87% after DMS treatment.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
field germinability of DMS-treated seedse0
Value
83–87 %e0
Comparator
gamma-irradiated onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field germinability of DMS-treated seeds was 83–87 % vs. 11–15 % of gamma-irradiated ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field germination was 11–15% after gamma irradiation.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
gamma-irradiated onese0
Value
11–15 %e0
Comparator
DMS-treated seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field germinability of DMS-treated seeds was 83–87 % vs. 11–15 % of gamma-irradiated ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma irradiation had a stronger effect on M1 meiosis than DMS.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
gamma rays (120 and 150 Gy)e0
Outcome
M 1 meiosise0
Direction
strongere0
Comparator
DMS (0.01 and 0.05 %)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mutagenic effect of gamma rays (120 and 150 Gy) on M 1 meiosis was shown to be stronger than that of DMS (0.01 and 0.05 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120 Gy, altered cells represented 15.79–18.78%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
120 Gye0
Outcome
percentage of cells with alterationse0
Value
15.79–18.78 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of cells with alterations varied within 15.79–18.78 % (120 Gy) and 20.38–25.26 % (150 Gy) compared to 0–0.16 % in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 150 Gy, altered cells represented 20.38–25.26%.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
150 Gye0
Outcome
percentage of cells with alterationse0
Value
20.38–25.26 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of cells with alterations varied within 15.79–18.78 % (120 Gy) and 20.38–25.26 % (150 Gy) compared to 0–0.16 % in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Altered cells represented 0–0.16% in controls.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
controle0
Value
0–0.16 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to 0–0.16 % in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma irradiation produced morphoses in 43% of plants.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
120 Gy or 150 Gy of gamma irradiatione0
Outcome
plants with alterationse0
Value
43 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after exposure to 120 Gy or 150 Gy of gamma irradiation, the number of plants with alterations was 43 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMS treatment produced morphoses in 27–28% of plants.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
DMS treatment (0.01 and 0.05 %)e0
Outcome
this parametere0
Value
27–28 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after DMS treatment (0.01 and 0.05 %) this parameter averaged 27–28 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1493 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mutations of quantitative and qualitative traits were inherited in M2 families.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material
mutant M2 familiese0
Outcome
inheritance of mutations of quantitative and qualitative traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We determined the inheritance of mutations of quantitative and qualitative traits, which are important for breeding, in mutant M2 families”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1633 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mutant families with inherited altered traits were selected.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
mutant families with inherited altered traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“selected mutant families with inherited altered traits that can be considered as mutations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1728 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected mutants had increased seed oil content.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
content of oil in seedse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mutants with increased content of oil in seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1808–1854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected mutants had increased 1000-seed weight.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
1000-seed weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased 1000-seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1856–1882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected mutants had increased levels of behenic, linoleic, and palmitoleic acids.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
contents of behenic, linoleic and palmitoleic acidse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased contents of behenic, linoleic and palmitoleic acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1884–1945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected mutants showed absolute resistance to downy mildew.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
resistance to downy mildewe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“absolute resistance to downy mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1962–1997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–74 · show in text ↑

radiation · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 8 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.