Paper · 2014 · The Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation Institutional Repository (The Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation)

Plant-microbe competition for nitrogen and phosphorous affected by drought

FD Dikjstra; Minhui He; MP Johansen; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Competition for nutrients between plants and microbes is an important determinant for plant growth, biodiversity and carbon cycling. Perturbations such as drought affect plant-microbe competition for nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). Despite the importance of these nutrients in most ecosystems, plant-microbe competition for N and P remains poorly understood. We used a novel dual isotope labelling technique (15N and 32P) to assess plant-microbe competition for N and P affected by drought in two different plant-soil systems. Mesocosms were extracted from a grassland site where plants were strongly limited by N (N-limiting system) and from a grassland site that showed strong soil P adsorption (P-adsorbing system). Half of the mesocosms were subjected to drought one week prior to injection of the tracers. Stable 15N (as KNO3) and radio-labelled 32P (as H3PO4) were injected, and measured in the plant and microbial biomass 72 hrs later. Microbial uptake of 32P was strongly reduced by drought (on average by 89%), while microbial 15N uptake was not. In contrast, drought reduced plant uptake of 15N (by 28%), but not of 32P. Microbial 15N uptake was much larger in the N-limiting system than in the P-adsorbing system (by 491%), while plant 32P uptake was much larger in the P-adsorbing system than in the Nlimiting system (by 703%). Both plants and microbes showed large flexibility in taking up 15N and 32P with the largest uptake of the nutrient that was in greatest demand. Our results suggest that under drought conditions, plants lose in terms of N uptake, but win in terms of P uptake when competing for these nutrients with microbes. These different sensitivities to drought by plants and microbes may enhance decoupling of the N and P cycle with increased drought conditions, depending on if plants and microbes are N or P limited.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced microbial 32P uptake by 89% on average.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Treatment
droughte0
Interactor
microbese1othere0
Outcome
Microbial uptake of 32Pe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
89%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial uptake of 32P was strongly reduced by drought (on average by 89%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant-microbe competition for nitrogen and phosphorous affected by drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both plants and microbes showed large flexibility in taking up 15N and 32P with the largest uptake of the nutrient that was in greatest demand.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought did not reduce microbial 15N uptake.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Treatment
droughtt0
Outcome
microbial 15N uptakee0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“while microbial 15N uptake was not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant-microbe competition for nitrogen and phosphorous affected by drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both plants and microbes showed large flexibility in taking up 15N and 32P with the largest uptake of the nutrient that was in greatest demand.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced plant 15N uptake by 28%.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
plant uptake of 15Ne0
Direction
reducede0
Value
28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“drought reduced plant uptake of 15N (by 28%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought did not reduce plant 32P uptake.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Treatment
droughtt0
Outcome
32Pe0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but not of 32P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant-microbe competition for nitrogen and phosphorous affected by drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both plants and microbes showed large flexibility in taking up 15N and 32P with the largest uptake of the nutrient that was in greatest demand.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1484 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial 15N uptake was 491% larger in the N-limiting system than the P-adsorbing system.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Interactor
microbese1othere0
Outcome
Microbial 15N uptakee0
Direction
largere0
Value
491%e0
Comparator
P-adsorbing systeme0
Setting
N-limiting systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial 15N uptake was much larger in the N-limiting system than in the P-adsorbing system (by 491%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant-microbe competition for nitrogen and phosphorous affected by drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both plants and microbes showed large flexibility in taking up 15N and 32P with the largest uptake of the nutrient that was in greatest demand.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1484 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant 32P uptake was 703% larger in the P-adsorbing system than the N-limiting system.

Taxon
plante0
Outcome
plant 32P uptakee0
Direction
largere0
Value
703%e0
Comparator
Nlimiting systeme0
Setting
P-adsorbing systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“plant 32P uptake was much larger in the P-adsorbing system than in the Nlimiting system (by 703%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1339 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants and microbes took up the nutrient in greatest demand.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Interactor
microbese0other
Outcome
largest uptake of the nutrient that was in greatest demande0

Verbatim

e0

“Both plants and microbes showed large flexibility in taking up 15N and 32P with the largest uptake of the nutrient that was in greatest demand.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1484 · show in text ↑

drought · nutrient: content · Viridiplantae (plants)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.