Paper · 2019 · South African Journal of Botany

Combined application of moringa leaf extract and chemical growth-promoters enhances the plant growth and productivity of wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.)

S. Khan; S.M.A. Basra; M. Nawaz; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
71
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wheat is regarded as a main staple crop in Pakistan because its contribution to the daily diet of a common man is 60%. Late sowing of wheat not only reduces yield but also affects efficiency of other production factors but it is not possible to absolutely avoid late sowing. Moringa leaf extract (MLE), exogenously applied either through seed or plant foliage, is known to boost field crops productivity under both normal and unfavorable conditions. A study was conducted to evaluate the crop growth enhancing potential of MLE alone and in combination with hydrogen peroxide, salicylic acid (SA) and ascorbic acid (ASA). The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with split plot arrangements having three replications. The treatments were control, hydropriming, MLE (3%) priming, MLE + H2O2 (2 μM) + SA (50 mg L−1) + ASA (50 mg L−1) priming, water spray, MLE spray and MLE + H2O2 + SA + ASA spray. Foliar treatments were applied twice during growth period at tillering and booting stages. Foliar application and priming approaches of MLE alone and with growth promoting substances were found to be better than control, and foliar effects were more prominent. Foliar application of MLE improved biological and grain yields and biochemical parameters as compared to control. It can be concluded that application of MLE as a priming agent improved the emergence parameters in normal and late sown wheat. Alone and blended MLE spray also enhanced the biochemical traits as well as growth attributes of wheat. Notably, application of moringa leaf extract alone portrays a beneficial role in terms of biological as well as economical yield of late sown wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moringa extract foliar treatment and priming, alone or blended, outperformed control, especially foliar treatment.

Treatment
MLE alone and with growth promoting substancese0
Outcome
better than controle0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application and priming approaches of MLE alone and with growth promoting substances were found to be better than control, and foliar effects were more prominent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar MLE improved biological and grain yields relative to control.

Treatment
Foliar application of MLEe0
Outcome
biological and grain yieldse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of MLE improved biological and grain yields and biochemical parameters as compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar MLE improved biochemical parameters relative to control.

Treatment
Foliar application of MLEe0
Outcome
biochemical parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of MLE improved biological and grain yields and biochemical parameters as compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MLE priming improved emergence in normally and late sown wheat.

Treatment
MLE as a priming agente0
Outcome
emergence parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
normal and late sown wheate0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of MLE as a priming agent improved the emergence parameters in normal and late sown wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MLE spray alone enhanced wheat biochemical and growth traits.

Treatment
Alonee0
Outcome
biochemical traits as well as growth attributese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alone and blended MLE spray also enhanced the biochemical traits as well as growth attributes of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended MLE spray enhanced wheat biochemical and growth traits.

Treatment
blended MLE spraye0
Outcome
biochemical traits as well as growth attributese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alone and blended MLE spray also enhanced the biochemical traits as well as growth attributes of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MLE alone benefited biological and economic yield of late sown wheat.

Treatment
moringa leaf extract alonee0
Outcome
biological as well as economical yielde0
Direction
beneficiale0
Qualifier
late sown wheate0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of moringa leaf extract alone portrays a beneficial role in terms of biological as well as economical yield of late sown wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1674 · show in text ↑

botanical · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

botanical · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

140 papers: 123 positive, 17 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

136 papers more in this group

See all 140 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

293 papers: 259 positive, 34 negative or no effect

258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

289 papers more in this group

See all 293 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

303 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

435 papers: 206 positive, 229 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this paper · 228 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

431 papers more in this group

See all 435 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.