Paper · 2019 · American Journal of Botany

Interactions of plant growth responses to spring freezing and summer drought: a multispecies comparison

Ricky S. Kong; Hugh A. L. Henry

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Freezing and drought both result in cellular dehydration, and similar physiological responses to these stressors may result in cross acclimation, whereby prior freezing exposure increases subsequent drought tolerance. We examined how spring freezing influences summer drought tolerance for a range of herbaceous old field species: 6 graminoids (Agrostis stolonifera, Arrhenatherum elatius, Bromus inermis, Festuca rubra, Lolium perenne, Poa compressa) and 2 forbs (Plantago lanceolata, Securigera varia), with the goal of examining the generality of cross acclimation responses. METHODS: We exposed the plants to -5°C in the spring and to a 3-week summer drought, and harvested the plants after a 3-week watering/recovery period. We also measured leaf soluble proteins and sugars to explore the potential mechanisms before and during drought stress. KEY RESULTS: For Agrostis stolonifera, Bromus inermis, Lolium perenne, Plantago lanceolata, and Poa compressa there was evidence of cross acclimation based on aboveground or belowground biomass, with a reduction in the severity of the drought effect for the plants previously exposed to freezing. Freezing and drought effects were additive for Arrhenatherum elatius, and for the remaining two species the test of the freezing-drought interaction was inconclusive, because significant drought and freezing effects did not co-occur. When present, freezing-drought interactions were not correlated with changes in leaf soluble protein or sugars. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal that the phenomenon of freezing-drought cross acclimation appears to be common in herbaceous species, and variation among species in cross acclimation indicates that multiple stresses could alter relative species abundances in plant communities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agrostis stolonifera showed reduced drought effect on biomass after prior freezing.

Taxon
Agrostis stoloniferaAgrostis stoloniferae0
Treatment
previously exposed to freezinge0
Outcome
severity of the drought effecte0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Agrostis stolonifera, Bromus inermis, Lolium perenne, Plantago lanceolata, and Poa compressa there was evidence of cross acclimation based on aboveground or belowground biomass, with a reduction in the severity of the drought effect for the plants previously exposed to freezing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bromus inermis showed reduced drought effect on biomass after prior freezing.

Taxon
Bromus inermisBromus inermise0
Treatment
previously exposed to freezinge0
Outcome
severity of the drought effecte0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bromus inermis
Bromus inermis · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Agrostis stolonifera, Bromus inermis, Lolium perenne, Plantago lanceolata, and Poa compressa there was evidence of cross acclimation based on aboveground or belowground biomass, with a reduction in the severity of the drought effect for the plants previously exposed to freezing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lolium perenne showed reduced drought effect on biomass after prior freezing.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee0
Treatment
previously exposed to freezinge0
Outcome
severity of the drought effecte0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Agrostis stolonifera, Bromus inermis, Lolium perenne, Plantago lanceolata, and Poa compressa there was evidence of cross acclimation based on aboveground or belowground biomass, with a reduction in the severity of the drought effect for the plants previously exposed to freezing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plantago lanceolata showed reduced drought effect on biomass after prior freezing.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolataPlantago lanceolatae0
Treatment
previously exposed to freezinge0
Outcome
severity of the drought effecte0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Agrostis stolonifera, Bromus inermis, Lolium perenne, Plantago lanceolata, and Poa compressa there was evidence of cross acclimation based on aboveground or belowground biomass, with a reduction in the severity of the drought effect for the plants previously exposed to freezing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poa compressa showed reduced drought effect on biomass after prior freezing.

Taxon
Poa compressaPoa compressae0
Treatment
previously exposed to freezinge0
Outcome
severity of the drought effecte0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Poa compressa
Poa compressa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Agrostis stolonifera, Bromus inermis, Lolium perenne, Plantago lanceolata, and Poa compressa there was evidence of cross acclimation based on aboveground or belowground biomass, with a reduction in the severity of the drought effect for the plants previously exposed to freezing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1167 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freezing and drought effects were additive for Arrhenatherum elatius.

Taxon
Arrhenatherum elatiusArrhenatherum elatiuse0
Outcome
Freezing and drought effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arrhenatherum elatius
Arrhenatherum elatius · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Freezing and drought effects were additive for Arrhenatherum elatius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1237 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The freezing–drought interaction test was inconclusive for two remaining species because significant effects did not coincide.

Taxon
Festuca rubraFestuca rubrat0
Outcome
test of the freezing-drought interactione0
Qualifier
inconclusivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Festuca rubra
Festuca rubra · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 12:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for the remaining two species the test of the freezing-drought interaction was inconclusive, because significant drought and freezing effects did not co-occur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“Festuca rubra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–441 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freezing–drought interactions did not correlate with leaf soluble protein or sugar changes.

Taxon
herbaceous old field speciese1
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
freezing-drought interactionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“freezing-drought interactions were not correlated with changes in leaf soluble protein or sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1513 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant growth responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“herbaceous old field species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–351 · show in text ↑