Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Engineering Research and

Forage Production and Water use Efficiency (WUE) of Sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor L.) Under Drought Stress as Affected by Silicon (SI) Treatments

Burhan A. M. Niyazi

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study investigated the role of silicone (Si) in mitigating effects of drought on sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) dry forage production and water use efficiency (WUE). Reduction of irrigation water from 100% to 60% ETc resulted in significant reduction in dry forage production of sorghum up to (22.75%). Reduction in irrigation water from (100% to 60% ETc) increased WUE. Under application of Si forage dry yield and WUE increased significantly. Within each irrigation water level application of Si resulted in increase in forage dry yield and WUE with increase in Si dose from 0 to 2 kg ha-1. In the meanwhile, the foliar application of Si (2 kg ha-1) with irrigation treatment (100% ETc) significantly increased the dry forage yield and raised it to the highest percentage 30% compared to no Si treatment. Irrigation with 80% ETc together with application of 2 kg ha-1 Si gave the highest WUE compared to 100% ETc. In growing sorghum for dry yield purpose, 60% ETc and 2 kg ha-1 Si is an economical option with more water saving and small reduction in yield especially in arid regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing irrigation to 60% ETc lowered dry forage production by 22.75%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
60% ETce0
Outcome
dry forage productione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
22.75%e0
Comparator
100%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction of irrigation water from 100% to 60% ETc resulted in significant reduction in dry forage production of sorghum up to (22.75%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing irrigation from 100% to 60% ETc increased WUE.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
60% ETce0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
100%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction in irrigation water from (100% to 60% ETc) increased WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–372 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon application significantly increased forage dry yield and WUE.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
forage dry yield and WUEe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under application of Si forage dry yield and WUE increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within irrigation levels, increasing silicon dose from 0 to 2 kg ha-1 raised forage dry yield and WUE.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Si dose from 0 to 2 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
forage dry yield and WUEe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Within each irrigation water level application of Si resulted in increase in forage dry yield and WUE with increase in Si dose from 0 to 2 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon at 2 kg ha-1 with full irrigation increased dry forage yield by 30% versus no silicon.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
foliar application of Si (2 kg ha-1) with irrigation treatment (100% ETc)e0
Outcome
dry forage yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30%e0
Comparator
no Si treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of Si (2 kg ha-1) with irrigation treatment (100% ETc) significantly increased the dry forage yield and raised it to the highest percentage 30% compared to no Si treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 80% ETc plus 2 kg ha-1 silicon gave the highest WUE versus full irrigation.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
80% ETc together with application of 2 kg ha-1 Sie0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
100% ETce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation with 80% ETc together with application of 2 kg ha-1 Si gave the highest WUE compared to 100% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–80 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 60% ETc and 2 kg ha-1 silicon for economical sorghum dry yield in arid regions.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Outcome
60% ETc and 2 kg ha-1 Si is an economical optione0
Setting
arid regionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In growing sorghum for dry yield purpose, 60% ETc and 2 kg ha-1 Si is an economical option with more water saving and small reduction in yield especially in arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1088 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: water · SorghumResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

irrigation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

131 papers: 94 positive, 37 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.