Paper · 2019 · Journal of Applied Microbiology

Co‐inoculation ofBacillussp. andPseudomonas putidaat different development stages acts as a biostimulant to promote growth, yield and nutrient uptake of tomato

Y. He; H.A. Pantigoso; Z. Wu; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
129
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

AIMS: This study builds upon the premise that roots culture distinct bacteria at specific stages of plant growth to benefit of specific microbial services needed at that particular growth stage. Accordingly, we hypothesized that the co-inoculation of beneficial microbes with distinct properties at specific stages of plant development would enhance plant performance. METHODS AND RESULTS: The chosen microbes were Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus mojavensis and Pseudomonas putida. These microbes were selected based on their specific services ranging from nutrient solubilization, root growth promotion and disease resistance, and were applied to the roots of tomato plants at specific time points when those services were needed the most by the plant. Laboratory and greenhouse studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of co-inoculation at specific stages of development compared to single microbial applications. CONCLUSION: In general, the combination of three microbes gave the highest biomass and yield without the presence of disease. Applications of three microbes showed the highest root/shoot ratio, and applications of four microbes the lowest ratio. Pseudomonas putida significantly increased fruit macronutrient and micronutrient contents. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Our studies suggest that co-inoculation of three or four microbes is a good strategy for healthy crop production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A three-microbe combination gave the highest tomato biomass.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
combination of three microbese0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of three microbes gave the highest biomass and yield without the presence of disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1069 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A three-microbe combination gave the highest tomato yield.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
combination of three microbese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of three microbes gave the highest biomass and yield without the presence of disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1069 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-microbe applications gave the highest root/shoot ratio.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
Applications of three microbese0
Outcome
root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of three microbes showed the highest root/shoot ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1137 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four-microbe applications gave the lowest root/shoot ratio.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume2
Treatment
applications of four microbese0
Outcome
root/shoot ratioe1
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applications of four microbes the lowest ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1189 · show in text ↑
e1

“root/shoot ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1137 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas putida significantly increased fruit macronutrient content.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
Pseudomonas putidae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
fruit macronutriente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas putida significantly increased fruit macronutrient and micronutrient contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1280 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas putida significantly increased fruit micronutrient content.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
Pseudomonas putidae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
micronutrient contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas putida significantly increased fruit macronutrient and micronutrient contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1280 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–697 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest three- or four-microbe co-inoculation for healthy production.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Outcome
co-inoculation of three or four microbes is a good strategy for healthy crop productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-inoculation of three or four microbes is a good strategy for healthy crop production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1432 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–697 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas putida · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

201 papers: 172 positive, 29 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

197 papers more in this group

See all 201 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.