Paper · 2019 · Coffee Science

SUCROSE IN DETOXIFICATION OF COFFEE PLANTS WITH GLYPHOSATE DRIFT

Ademilson De Oliveira Alecrim; Rubens José Guimarães; Dalyse Toledo Castanheira; et al.

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The weed’ control in coffee plants has great importance, as they compete for light, water and nutrients. The chemical control is the most used, emphasizing the glyphosate, however, when applied, drift can occur and consequently cause injuries to coffee. Many farmers use the sucrose application with the objective to reverse the damage caused by the herbicide drift, even without scientific basis to justify such action. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the sucrose application on the detoxification of coffee plants in the implantation phase with glyphosate drift. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, using a randomized block design, arranged in a 3 x 3 factorial scheme with 2 additional treatments, using 3 sucrose doses (2, 4 and 8%) with 3 application times (1, 24 and 168 hours after intoxication with 10% of the commercial glyphosate dose) with an additional one in which the plants were not intoxicated and not treated with sucrose and the other additional only with plants intoxicated by glyphosate. After 75 days conducting the experiment, growth, physiological and anatomical characteristics were evaluated. The application of sucrose in the reversal of intoxication of growth variables (height, leaf areaThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the sucrose application on the detoxification of coffee plants in the implantation phase with glyphosate drift. number of leaves, shoot dry weight and dry weight of the root system) was not efficient. For the physiological variables the application of 2% sucrose, one hour after glyphosate intoxication was the most efficient treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose did not efficiently reverse glyphosate injury to coffee growth variables.

Taxon
coffee plantsCoffeae0
Treatment
application of sucrosee0
Outcome
growth variablese0
Direction
not efficiente0
Qualifier
glyphosate drifte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of sucrose in the reversal of intoxication of growth variables (height, leaf areaThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the sucrose application on the detoxification of coffee plants in the implantation phase with glyphosate drift. number of leaves, shoot dry weight and dry weight of the root system) was not efficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2% sucrose application one hour after glyphosate intoxication was most efficient for coffee physiological variables.

Taxon
coffee plantsCoffeat0
Treatment
application of 2% sucrose, one hour after glyphosate intoxicatione0
Outcome
physiological variablese0
Direction
most efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the physiological variables the application of 2% sucrose, one hour after glyphosate intoxication was the most efficient treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“COFFEE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–42 · show in text ↑