Paper · 2009

Effect of coatings on qualities of mango cv. Nam Dok Mai during storage

Watthanamon Chanjarujit; Anuvat Jangchud; Kamolwan Jangchud

3
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effect of coating on the quality of mango cv. Nam Dok Mai were investigated by coating the mangoes with 0.1 percent and 0.3 percent Chitosan, 5 percent Shellac, 0.1 percent Chitosan blend with 5 percent Shellac and 0.3 percent Chitosan blend with 5 percent Shellac in a portion of 14.94 Chitosan and 84.66 Shellac in comparison with non-coating (control). Samples were then kept at 29 +- 2 deg C, 78 +- 5 percent relative humidity. The results revealed that coating with either 0.1 percent Chitosan or 5 percent Shellac was the best treatment to maintain the quality of mango by delaying weight loss, respiration rate and had a higher of liking score than those of other coatings at 8 day.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating with either 0.1 percent Chitosan or 5 percent Shellac delayed weight loss of mango during storage compared with non-coated control.

Material
Nam Dok Mait0
Treatment
coating with either 0.1 percent Chitosan or 5 percent Shellace1
Outcome
weight losse1
Direction
delayinge1
Comparator
non-coating (control)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cv. Nam Dok Mai”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“coating with either 0.1 percent Chitosan or 5 percent Shellac was the best treatment to maintain the quality of mango by delaying weight loss, respiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–617 · show in text ↑
e2

“in comparison with non-coating (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating with either 0.1 percent Chitosan or 5 percent Shellac delayed respiration rate of mango during storage compared with non-coated control.

Material
Nam Dok Mait0
Treatment
coating with either 0.1 percent Chitosan or 5 percent Shellace1
Outcome
respiration ratee1
Direction
delayinge1
Comparator
non-coating (control)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cv. Nam Dok Mai”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“coating with either 0.1 percent Chitosan or 5 percent Shellac was the best treatment to maintain the quality of mango by delaying weight loss, respiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–617 · show in text ↑
e2

“in comparison with non-coating (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating with either 0.1 percent Chitosan or 5 percent Shellac gave mango a higher liking score than other coatings at 8 days.

Material
Nam Dok Mait0
Treatment
coating with either 0.1 percent Chitosan or 5 percent Shellace1
Outcome
liking scoree3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
other coatingse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango cv. Nam Dok Mai”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“coating with either 0.1 percent Chitosan or 5 percent Shellac was the best treatment to maintain the quality of mango by delaying weight loss, respiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–617 · show in text ↑
e3

“had a higher of liking score than those of other coatings at 8 day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–688 · show in text ↑

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 44 positive, 1 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

LAC dye · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chitosan · physiology: respiration · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

storage · physiology: respiration · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 105 positive, 4 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.