Paper · 2015 · Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences

Effects of Hot Water, UV-C and Modified Coconut Oil Treatments on Suppression of Anthracnose Disease and Maintenance of Quality in Harvested Mango cv. ‘Chok-Anan’

Kanlaya Sripong

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz. is the major problem of harvested mango for domestic markets and for export. Control of anthracnose disease is currently based on the application of fungicides. However, it was reported that there are some chemical residues of chemical in mango and in the environment. Therefore, safe alternative methods for controlling anthracnose disease were studied. The aim of this experiment was to evaluate the antifungal properties of modified coconut oil (MCO) in vitro test and to investigate the combined effects of ethanolic shellac - modified coconut oil solution (ES-MCO), hot water (HW) and UV-C treatments on controlling anthracnose disease and maintaining postharvest quality of mango fruit cv. Chok-Anan (in vivo test). The antifungal activity of the MCO was determined by a paper disc method and tested the survival of MCO treated-fungal spores on PDA. The results revealed that 2% MCO significantly inhibited the mycelail growth of C. gloeosporioides on paper disc and completely killed fungal spore on PDA. In vivo test, harvested mangoes were cleaned with a solution of 100 ppm sodium hypochlorite and air dried. The fruit were treated with HW, UV-C followed by ES-MCO coating (HW + UV-C + ES-MCO), HW followed by UV-C (HW + UV-C), or ES-MCO alone. Untreated fruit served as the control. All fruit samples were then kept at 13°C for 15 days. HW + UV-C + ES-MCO treatments showed the most effective in reducing anthracnose disease, followed by HW + UV-C treatments, and ES-MCO treatment, while the control fruit showed the greatest symptoms of anthracnose disease. In addition, both the ES-MCO alone and the combined treatments of HW + UV-C + ES-MCO significantly delayed ripening of fruit by retarding firmness, weight loss, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), ethylene production and respiration rate, while the peel and pulp color of mango fruit were maintained throughout the storage period. This founding shows that HW + UV-C + ES-MCO treatments may act as the safe alternative methods to suppress anthracnose disease and delayed the senescence of mango fruit during cold storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2% modified coconut oil significantly inhibited mycelial growth of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on paper discs.

Treatment
2% MCOe0
Interactor
C. gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese0pathogen
Outcome
mycelail growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harvested Mango cv. ‘Chok-Anan’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–162 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% MCO significantly inhibited the mycelail growth of C. gloeosporioides on paper disc and completely killed fungal spore on PDA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2% modified coconut oil completely killed fungal spores of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on PDA.

Treatment
2% MCOe0
Interactor
C. gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese0pathogen
Outcome
fungal sporee0
Direction
completely killede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harvested Mango cv. ‘Chok-Anan’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–162 · show in text ↑
e0

“2% MCO significantly inhibited the mycelail growth of C. gloeosporioides on paper disc and completely killed fungal spore on PDA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined HW + UV-C + ES-MCO treatment was most effective in reducing anthracnose disease of mango compared with the control.

Material
Chok-Anant0
Treatment
HW + UV-C + ES-MCO treatmentse1
Outcome
anthracnose diseasee1
Direction
reducinge1
Comparator
control fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harvested Mango cv. ‘Chok-Anan’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“HW + UV-C + ES-MCO treatments showed the most effective in reducing anthracnose disease, followed by HW + UV-C treatments, and ES-MCO treatment, while the control fruit showed the greatest symptoms of anthracnose disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HW + UV-C treatment reduced anthracnose disease of mango compared with the control, less than the combined treatment.

Material
Chok-Anant0
Treatment
HW + UV-C treatmentse1
Outcome
anthracnose diseasee1
Direction
reducinge1
Comparator
control fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harvested Mango cv. ‘Chok-Anan’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“HW + UV-C + ES-MCO treatments showed the most effective in reducing anthracnose disease, followed by HW + UV-C treatments, and ES-MCO treatment, while the control fruit showed the greatest symptoms of anthracnose disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ES-MCO coating alone reduced anthracnose disease of mango compared with the control, less than the combined treatments.

Material
Chok-Anant0
Treatment
ES-MCO treatmente1
Outcome
anthracnose diseasee1
Direction
reducinge1
Comparator
control fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harvested Mango cv. ‘Chok-Anan’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“HW + UV-C + ES-MCO treatments showed the most effective in reducing anthracnose disease, followed by HW + UV-C treatments, and ES-MCO treatment, while the control fruit showed the greatest symptoms of anthracnose disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ES-MCO coating alone significantly delayed ripening of mango fruit during cold storage.

Material
Chok-Anant0
Treatment
ES-MCO alonee2
Outcome
ripening of fruite2
Direction
delayede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harvested Mango cv. ‘Chok-Anan’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“both the ES-MCO alone and the combined treatments of HW + UV-C + ES-MCO significantly delayed ripening of fruit by retarding firmness, weight loss, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), ethylene production and respiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ES-MCO coating alone significantly retarded changes in firmness, weight loss and total soluble solids of mango.

Material
Chok-Anant0
Treatment
ES-MCO alonee2
Outcome
firmness, weight loss, total soluble solids (TSS)e2
Direction
retardinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harvested Mango cv. ‘Chok-Anan’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“both the ES-MCO alone and the combined treatments of HW + UV-C + ES-MCO significantly delayed ripening of fruit by retarding firmness, weight loss, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), ethylene production and respiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ES-MCO coating alone significantly retarded changes in titratable acidity, ethylene production and respiration rate of mango.

Material
Chok-Anant0
Treatment
ES-MCO alonee2
Outcome
titratable acidity (TA), ethylene production and respiration ratee2
Direction
retardinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harvested Mango cv. ‘Chok-Anan’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“both the ES-MCO alone and the combined treatments of HW + UV-C + ES-MCO significantly delayed ripening of fruit by retarding firmness, weight loss, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), ethylene production and respiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined HW + UV-C + ES-MCO treatment significantly delayed ripening of mango fruit during cold storage.

Material
Chok-Anant0
Treatment
HW + UV-C + ES-MCOe2
Outcome
ripening of fruite2
Direction
delayede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harvested Mango cv. ‘Chok-Anan’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“both the ES-MCO alone and the combined treatments of HW + UV-C + ES-MCO significantly delayed ripening of fruit by retarding firmness, weight loss, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), ethylene production and respiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined HW + UV-C + ES-MCO treatment significantly retarded changes in firmness, weight loss and total soluble solids of mango.

Material
Chok-Anant0
Treatment
HW + UV-C + ES-MCOe2
Outcome
firmness, weight loss, total soluble solids (TSS)e2
Direction
retardinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harvested Mango cv. ‘Chok-Anan’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“both the ES-MCO alone and the combined treatments of HW + UV-C + ES-MCO significantly delayed ripening of fruit by retarding firmness, weight loss, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), ethylene production and respiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined HW + UV-C + ES-MCO treatment significantly retarded changes in titratable acidity, ethylene production and respiration rate of mango.

Material
Chok-Anant0
Treatment
HW + UV-C + ES-MCOe2
Outcome
titratable acidity (TA), ethylene production and respiration ratee2
Direction
retardinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harvested Mango cv. ‘Chok-Anan’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–162 · show in text ↑
e2

“both the ES-MCO alone and the combined treatments of HW + UV-C + ES-MCO significantly delayed ripening of fruit by retarding firmness, weight loss, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), ethylene production and respiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1891 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peel and pulp color of mango fruit were maintained throughout cold storage.

Organ / stage
peel and pulpe3
Outcome
peel and pulp colore3
Direction
maintainede3
Qualifier
throughout the storage periode3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harvested Mango cv. ‘Chok-Anan’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–162 · show in text ↑
e3

“while the peel and pulp color of mango fruit were maintained throughout the storage period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1893–1983 · show in text ↑

LAC dye · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

heat · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

40 papers: 33 positive, 7 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

uv · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

heat · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

heat · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

uv · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

uv · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.