Abstract
Citrus is considered as one of the most important agricultural products in the world that increasing its yield and product has attracted global attraction. The present researchhas been designed in the Randomize Completely Design inthe factorial plan in four replications. The main factor was includedsubstrate enriched (PGPR bio fertilizers) and without enriched substrate. Subplot was conventional 5 treatments: 1) control (without chemical fertilizers and phosphate bio fertilizer), 2) seedlingsrsquo root inoculated with Pseudomonas putida 41 3) phosphate fertilizer based on soil test 4) phosphate chemical fertilizer, 25% less than soil test + Pseudomonas putida 41 and 5) phosphate chemical fertilizer, 50% less than soil test + Pseudomonas putida 41nbsp in 4 replicates .Overall 40 pots have been tested. The results analysis with MSTATC software using Duncan test showed that wet and dry weight of root and shoot and the P, Fe, Zn concentrations and the lateral branches number increased in substrate enriched in compared with control.nbsp The growth parameters include rootstock length, scion length, rootstock diameter and scion diameter increased in different treatments of pseudomonas and phosphorus fertilizer.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Enriched substrate increased citrus root and shoot wet and dry weights.
- Treatment
- substrate enrichede0
- Outcome
- wet and dry weight of root and shoote0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Citrus Seedlings”
e0“wet and dry weight of root and shoot and the P, Fe, Zn concentrations and the lateral branches number increased in substrate enriched in compared with control”
Claim · model-written summary
Enriched substrate increased citrus P, Fe and Zn concentrations.
- Treatment
- substrate enrichede0
- Outcome
- P, Fe, Zn concentrationse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Citrus Seedlings”
e0“the P, Fe, Zn concentrations and the lateral branches number increased in substrate enriched in compared with control”
Claim · model-written summary
Enriched substrate increased lateral branch number.
- Treatment
- substrate enrichede0
- Outcome
- lateral branches numbere0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Citrus Seedlings”
e0“the lateral branches number increased in substrate enriched in compared with control”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas and phosphorus fertilizer treatments increased citrus rootstock and scion lengths.
- Treatment
- different treatments of pseudomonas and phosphorus fertilizere0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas putida 41
Pseudomonas putidae1symbiont - Outcome
- rootstock length, scion lengthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“Citrus Seedlings”
e0“rootstock length, scion length, rootstock diameter and scion diameter increased in different treatments of pseudomonas and phosphorus fertilizer”
e1“seedlingsrsquo root inoculated with Pseudomonas putida 41”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas and phosphorus fertilizer treatments increased citrus rootstock and scion diameters.
- Treatment
- different treatments of pseudomonas and phosphorus fertilizere0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas putida 41
Pseudomonas putidae1symbiont - Outcome
- rootstock diameter and scion diametere0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“Citrus Seedlings”
e0“rootstock length, scion length, rootstock diameter and scion diameter increased in different treatments of pseudomonas and phosphorus fertilizer”
e1“seedlingsrsquo root inoculated with Pseudomonas putida 41”
The same questions in other papers
growing medium · growth · CitrusResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.