Paper · 2019 · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Effects of lactic acid bacteria inoculation in pre-harvesting period on fermentation and feed quality properties of alfalfa silage

İbrahim Ertekin; Mustafa Kızılşimşek

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop the fermentation quality and chemical composition of alfalfa (Medicago sativa Lam.) silage, plants were inoculated with different lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains at field 24 hours before harvest. METHODS: The treatment groups were as follow: silage without additive as a control and inoculated with each strains of Lactobacillus brevis (LS-55-2-2), Leuconostoc citerum (L-70-6-1), Lactobacillus bifermentans (LS-65-2-1), Lactobacillus plantarum (LS-3-3) and Lactobacillus plantarum (LS-72-2). All the silages were stored at 25 ºC. Parameters such as pH, microorganism and volatile fatty acid contents, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, net gas, metabolizable energy, organic matter digestibility, dry matter intake and relative feed value were measured to determine fermentation quality, chemical compositions and relative feed value of alfalfa silages. RESULTS: Significant differences were found among the control and treated groups in terms of pH and microorganism contents at all opening times and crude protein, net gas, metabolizable energy and organic matter digestibility of final silage. The pH values ranged from 4.70 to 5.52 for all treatments and control silage had the highest value of overall treatments at T75d silages. Volatile fatty acid of silages was not influenced significantly by inoculations. However, lactic acid content of L. bifermentans (LS-65-2-1) was higher than the other treatments. The highest metabolizable energy and organic matter digestibility were recorded from L. citerum (L-70-6-1) inoculation. In addition, no significant differences were found among treatments in terms of neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, dry matter intake and relative feed value. CONCLUSION: Among the treated lactic acid bacteria isolates, Lactobacillus bifermentans came into prominence especially in terms of organic acid composition and quality characters of silages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation groups differed significantly from controls in pH and microorganism contents at all openings.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
treated groupse0
Outcome
pH and microorganism contentse0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences were found among the control and treated groups in terms of pH and microorganism contents at all opening times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1050 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa Lam.) silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Final silage groups differed significantly in crude protein, net gas, metabolizable energy, and organic matter digestibility.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
treated groupse0
Outcome
crude protein, net gas, metabolizable energy and organic matter digestibilitye0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences were found among the control and treated groups in terms of pH and microorganism contents at all opening times and crude protein, net gas, metabolizable energy and organic matter digestibility of final silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1148 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa Lam.) silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control silage had the highest pH at 75 days, with values across treatments ranging from 4.70 to 5.52.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome
pH valuese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.70 to 5.52e0
Qualifier
T75d silagese0
Comparator
control silagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pH values ranged from 4.70 to 5.52 for all treatments and control silage had the highest value of overall treatments at T75d silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1286 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa Lam.) silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculations did not significantly influence volatile fatty acid content.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
inoculationse0
Outcome
Volatile fatty acide0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Volatile fatty acid of silages was not influenced significantly by inoculations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1367 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa Lam.) silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactobacillus bifermentans LS-65-2-1 silage had higher lactic acid content than other treatments.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
L. bifermentans (LS-65-2-1)e0
Outcome
lactic acid contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lactic acid content of L. bifermentans (LS-65-2-1) was higher than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1465 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa Lam.) silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leuconostoc citerum L-70-6-1 inoculation produced the highest metabolizable energy and organic matter digestibility.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
L. citerum (L-70-6-1) inoculatione0
Outcome
metabolizable energy and organic matter digestibilitye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest metabolizable energy and organic matter digestibility were recorded from L. citerum (L-70-6-1) inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1585 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa Lam.) silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not differ significantly in neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, dry matter intake, or relative feed value.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, dry matter intake and relative feed valuee0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences were found among treatments in terms of neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, dry matter intake and relative feed value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1755 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa Lam.) silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–112 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors singled out Lactobacillus bifermentans for organic acid composition and silage quality.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome
Lactobacillus bifermentans came into prominencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the treated lactic acid bacteria isolates, Lactobacillus bifermentans came into prominence especially in terms of organic acid composition and quality characters of silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1947 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa Lam.) silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–112 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: oil · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 22 positive, 4 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.