Paper · 2019 · Agronomy Journal

Economics and Agronomics of Relay‐Cropping Pennycress and Camelina with Soybean in Minnesota

Matthew A. Ott; Carrie A. Eberle; Matt D. Thom; et al.

11
claims
16
verbatim quotes
68
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Net income from relay cropping was rarely different from that of mono‐cropping. A 25‐cm oilseed row spacing was likely too narrow for optimal soybean growth. Further domestication of oilseeds will likely improve relay cropping with soybean. ABSTRACT Cover crops can serve as a valuable management tool for improving soil and water quality, but are an added expense for farmers. We evaluated the yields and economics of four cover crops and two winter fallow treatments in a spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)–soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation at three sites in Minnesota. The four cover crop treatments were winter rye ( Secale cereal L.), forage radish ( Raphanus sativus L.), winter camelina [ Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz], and pennycress ( Thlaspi arvense L.) planted into spring wheat stubble. The fallow treatments consisted of no‐tilled and conventionally tilled soil. Radish winterkilled and rye was terminated chemically before planting soybean in early May. Soybean was inter‐seeded between rows of camelina and pennycress at the same time it was planted in other treatments. Camelina and pennycress were harvested over soybean seedlings in late June. Camelina yields ranged from 600 to 1100 kg ha −1 , while pennycress ranged from 900 to 1550 kg ha −1 . Mono‐cropped soybean averaged 1819, 3510, and 4180 kg ha −1 in northern, central, and southern Minnesota, respectively. Soybean seedlings under oilseed cover crop canopies exhibited light‐stress, which likely reduced soybean yield in these treatments by 22 to 30%. When oilseed and inter‐seeded soybean yields were combined, total seed yields generally were equal to or exceeded those of mono‐cropped soybean. In addition, net income for inter‐seeded systems was typically equivalent to mono‐cropped soybean. Improvements in net income are likely needed before the benefits of oilseed cover crops are fully realized.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Camelina yielded 600 to 1100 kg per hectare.

Taxon
CamelinaCamelinae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Value
600 to 1100 kg ha −1e0
Setting
Minnesotae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camelina
Camelina · TaxonCecelia Alexander · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Camelina yields ranged from 600 to 1100 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1231 · show in text ↑
e1

“three sites in Minnesota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–592 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pennycress yielded 900 to 1550 kg per hectare.

Taxon
pennycresse0
Outcome
pennycress rangede0
Value
900 to 1550 kg ha −1e0
Setting
Minnesotae2

Verbatim

e0

“pennycress ranged from 900 to 1550 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1283 · show in text ↑
e1

“Camelina yields ranged from 600 to 1100 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1231 · show in text ↑
e2

“three sites in Minnesota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–592 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mono-cropped soybean averaged 1819 kg per hectare in northern Minnesota.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
averagede0
Value
1819e0
Setting
northerne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mono‐cropped soybean averaged 1819, 3510, and 4180 kg ha −1 in northern, central, and southern Minnesota, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1405 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mono-cropped soybean averaged 3510 kg per hectare in central Minnesota.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
averagede0
Value
3510e0
Setting
centrale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mono‐cropped soybean averaged 1819, 3510, and 4180 kg ha −1 in northern, central, and southern Minnesota, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1405 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mono-cropped soybean averaged 4180 kg per hectare in southern Minnesota.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
averagede0
Value
4180 kg ha −1e0
Setting
southern Minnesotae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mono‐cropped soybean averaged 1819, 3510, and 4180 kg ha −1 in northern, central, and southern Minnesota, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1405 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oilseed cover crop canopies caused light stress in soybean seedlings.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Outcome
light‐stresse0
Qualifier
under oilseed cover crop canopiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean seedlings under oilseed cover crop canopies exhibited light‐stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oilseed cover crop treatments likely reduced soybean yield by 22 to 30%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
oilseed cover crop canopiese1
Outcome
soybean yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22 to 30%e0
Comparator
Mono‐cropped soybeane2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which likely reduced soybean yield in these treatments by 22 to 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1549 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soybean seedlings under oilseed cover crop canopies exhibited light‐stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1480 · show in text ↑
e2

“Mono‐cropped soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1306 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined oilseed and inter-seeded soybean seed yields generally equaled or exceeded mono-cropped soybean yields.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
total seed yieldse0
Direction
equal to or exceedede0
Comparator
mono‐cropped soybeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When oilseed and inter‐seeded soybean yields were combined, total seed yields generally were equal to or exceeded those of mono‐cropped soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1695 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net income in inter-seeded systems was typically equivalent to mono-cropped soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
mono‐cropped soybeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net income for inter‐seeded systems was typically equivalent to mono‐cropped soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1793 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered 25-cm oilseed row spacing likely too narrow for optimal soybean growth.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
oilseed row spacing was likely too narrow for optimal soybean growthe0
Value
25‐cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 25‐cm oilseed row spacing was likely too narrow for optimal soybean growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–168 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors expected further oilseed domestication to improve soybean relay cropping.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
Further domestication of oilseeds will likely improve relay cropping with soybeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further domestication of oilseeds will likely improve relay cropping with soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–251 · show in text ↑

cover crop · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 33 positive, 68 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.