Paper · 2019 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of shading and level of nitrogen fertilizer on nutrient quality of Pennisetumpurpureumcv Mott during wet season

Slamet Widodo; Bambang Suhartanto; Nafiatul Umami

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This research aim was to identify the nutrient quality of Pennisetum purpureum cv Mott that cultivated under shading of the Teak tree (Tectona grandis) and different level of nitrogen fertilizer. The shading treatment was using plantation of Tectona grandis with planting space more over 3 m and height about 8 m with lightning intensity 1675.83 lux and for control using open space plantation. Treatment for nitrogen fertilizer using urea (46% N2) consist of three levels; 0 kg/ha, 150 kg/ha and 300 kg/ha. Grasses are planted with space 75 x75 cm. Variables observed in the study included: dry matter, organic matter, crude fiber, crude protein, and total digestible nutrient (TDN). The design used in this study was split-plot design with main plot was shade and sub-plot was the level of nitrogen fertilizer. The result analyzed with analysis of variance followed by Duncan's new multiple range test (DMRT). The results showed that there was a significantly different decrease in the quality of plants on farmland under shading. Dry matter content and crude fiber decreasing under shading, but crude protein was increased. Application of nitrogen fertilizer significantly (P <0.05). able to increase the nutrient quality of Pennisetum purpureum cv Mott. The use of nitrogen fertilizer increasing dry matter, crude protein content and total digestible nutrient was increased with the application of nitrogen fertilizer. Based on result and discussion it can be concluded that nutrient quality of Pennisetum purpureum cv Mott increased with shading and application of nitrogen fertilizer. The most appropriate level of nitrogen fertilizer is 150 kg/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading under teak reduced dry matter content of Pennisetum purpureum relative to open space plantation

Taxon
Pennisetum purpureumCenchrus purpureuse0
Treatment
shadinge3
Outcome
Dry matter contente3
Direction
decreasinge3
Comparator
open space plantatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient quality of Pennisetum purpureum cv Mott that cultivated under shading of the Teak tree (Tectona grandis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–151 · show in text ↑
e2

“for control using open space plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–393 · show in text ↑
e3

“Dry matter content and crude fiber decreasing under shading, but crude protein was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading under teak reduced crude fiber of Pennisetum purpureum relative to open space plantation

Taxon
Pennisetum purpureumCenchrus purpureuse0
Treatment
shadinge3
Outcome
crude fibere3
Direction
decreasinge3
Comparator
open space plantatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient quality of Pennisetum purpureum cv Mott that cultivated under shading of the Teak tree (Tectona grandis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–151 · show in text ↑
e2

“for control using open space plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–393 · show in text ↑
e3

“Dry matter content and crude fiber decreasing under shading, but crude protein was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading under teak increased crude protein of Pennisetum purpureum relative to open space plantation

Taxon
Pennisetum purpureumCenchrus purpureuse0
Treatment
shadinge3
Outcome
crude proteine3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
open space plantatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient quality of Pennisetum purpureum cv Mott that cultivated under shading of the Teak tree (Tectona grandis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–151 · show in text ↑
e2

“for control using open space plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–393 · show in text ↑
e3

“Dry matter content and crude fiber decreasing under shading, but crude protein was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer increased dry matter, crude protein content and total digestible nutrient of Pennisetum purpureum

Taxon
Pennisetum purpureumCenchrus purpureuse0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere4
Outcome
dry matter, crude protein content and total digestible nutriente4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient quality of Pennisetum purpureum cv Mott that cultivated under shading of the Teak tree (Tectona grandis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–151 · show in text ↑
e4

“The use of nitrogen fertilizer increasing dry matter, crude protein content and total digestible nutrient was increased with the application of nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1421 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The most appropriate nitrogen fertilizer level for Pennisetum purpureum is 150 kg/ha

Taxon
Pennisetum purpureumCenchrus purpureuse0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere5
Outcome
most appropriate level of nitrogen fertilizere5
Value
150 kg/hae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient quality of Pennisetum purpureum cv Mott that cultivated under shading of the Teak tree (Tectona grandis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–151 · show in text ↑
e5

“The most appropriate level of nitrogen fertilizer is 150 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1653 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.