Paper · 2020 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of the different clipping time on the yield and quality of dwarf napiergrass on marginal land under manure application

A Wadi; Darmawan; Harifuddin; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The effect of the different clipping time on the yield and quality of Dwarf Napiergrass under manure application were investigated in this experiment. In relation to plant growth and quality, the needs of grassland for fertilizer nutrients are influenced by the intensity of management, by whether the forage crop is harvested by clipping and the botanical composition of the forage crop. Manure contains essential plant nutrients and to use as a soil amendment for crop production is a practical method, so as to solve the disposal problem of livestock. Dwarf napiergrass as a perennial summer crop under the blocked design with 2 plants m −2 were applied to 3 levels of manure and 4 clipping times. The manure revealed so effective fertilizer to increase dry matter yield, and forage quality, especially in crude protein content and in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) at the same clipping time with the increase in manure application level.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing manure raised dry matter yield at the same clipping time.

Taxon
Dwarf napiergrassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
increase in manure application levele0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
at the same clipping timee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The manure revealed so effective fertilizer to increase dry matter yield, and forage quality, especially in crude protein content and in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) at the same clipping time with the increase in manure application level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of the different clipping time on the yield and quality of dwarf napiergrass on marginal land under manure application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing manure improved forage quality at the same clipping time.

Taxon
Dwarf napiergrassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
increase in manure application levele0
Outcome
forage qualitye0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
at the same clipping timee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The manure revealed so effective fertilizer to increase dry matter yield, and forage quality, especially in crude protein content and in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) at the same clipping time with the increase in manure application level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of the different clipping time on the yield and quality of dwarf napiergrass on marginal land under manure application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing manure raised crude protein content at the same clipping time.

Taxon
Dwarf napiergrassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
increase in manure application levele0
Outcome
crude protein contente0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
at the same clipping timee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“especially in crude protein content and in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) at the same clipping time with the increase in manure application level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of the different clipping time on the yield and quality of dwarf napiergrass on marginal land under manure application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing manure raised in vitro dry matter digestibility at the same clipping time.

Taxon
Dwarf napiergrassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
increase in manure application levele0
Outcome
in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD)e0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
at the same clipping timee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“especially in crude protein content and in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) at the same clipping time with the increase in manure application level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of the different clipping time on the yield and quality of dwarf napiergrass on marginal land under manure application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: grain · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 26 positive, 7 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.