Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences

Acceptability of Pennisetum purpureum by West African dwarf rams as influenced by manure application rates

Toyese WİLLİAMS; Victoria OJO

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study evaluated the chemical composition and acceptability of Pennisetum purpureum by West African dwarf (WAD) rams as influenced by manure application rates. The experiment was a completely randomized design replicated three times. Grasses that have been fertilized with 5 and 10 t ha-1 of swine manure and unfertilized (control (0 t ha-1)), were harvested from the experimental site 9 weeks after planting from 15 cm above ground level and evaluated for proximate and fibre composition. The harvested grasses were also offered to nine WAD rams on cafeteria basis, to assess the acceptability indices of the grass based on treatments. Results showed that the grass with manures consistently had higher (p<0.05) crude protein (CP) contents than the control (unfertilized plants) while all the grasses with different manure rates had similar (p>0.05) neutral detergent fibre (NDF). Consumption, co-efficient of preference and relative palatability of P. purpureum by WAD rams were improved by manure application, where highest values of acceptability indices was recorded in grass with manure rate of 5 t ha-1 over 10 t ha-1 manured grass. Percentage consumption, co-efficient preference and relative palatability index were in the order 5 t ha-1 > 10 t ha-1 > 0 t ha-1 (unfertilized). From the result, it can be concluded that P. purpureum with manure had a better chemical composition profile (higher CP) and better acceptability than unfertilized grass. Enhancing P. purpureum with manure at 5 t ha-1 had higher ash content and improved acceptability by WAD rams than grass with 10 t ha-1 manure application rate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manured P. purpureum had higher crude protein content than unfertilized grass.

Taxon
Pennisetum purpureumCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
manuree1
Outcome
crude protein (CP) contentse1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
p<0.05e1
Comparator
control (unfertilized plants)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed that the grass with manures consistently had higher (p<0.05) crude protein (CP) contents than the control (unfertilized plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pennisetum purpureum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neutral detergent fibre was similar among grasses with different manure rates.

Taxon
Pennisetum purpureumCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
manure ratese2
Outcome
neutral detergent fibre (NDF)e2
Direction
similare2
Qualifier
p>0.05e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“all the grasses with different manure rates had similar (p>0.05) neutral detergent fibre (NDF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pennisetum purpureum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure application improved consumption, co-efficient of preference and relative palatability of P. purpureum by WAD rams.

Taxon
P. purpureumCenchrus purpureuse3
Treatment
manure applicatione3
Interactor
WAD ramse3herbivore
Outcome
Consumption, co-efficient of preference and relative palatabilitye3
Direction
improvede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Consumption, co-efficient of preference and relative palatability of P. purpureum by WAD rams were improved by manure application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pennisetum purpureum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass with 5 t ha-1 manure gave the highest acceptability indices, above grass with 10 t ha-1 manure.

Taxon
Pennisetum purpureumCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
manure rate of 5 t ha-1e4
Outcome
acceptability indicese4
Direction
higheste4
Comparator
10 t ha-1 manured grasse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“highest values of acceptability indices was recorded in grass with manure rate of 5 t ha-1 over 10 t ha-1 manured grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pennisetum purpureum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consumption, co-efficient preference and relative palatability index followed the order 5 t ha-1 > 10 t ha-1 > 0 t ha-1.

Taxon
Pennisetum purpureumCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
5 t ha-1e5
Outcome
Percentage consumption, co-efficient preference and relative palatability indexe5
Direction
in the order 5 t ha-1 > 10 t ha-1 > 0 t ha-1e5
Comparator
0 t ha-1 (unfertilized)e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Percentage consumption, co-efficient preference and relative palatability index were in the order 5 t ha-1 > 10 t ha-1 > 0 t ha-1 (unfertilized)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pennisetum purpureum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure at 5 t ha-1 gave higher ash content than manure at 10 t ha-1.

Taxon
P. purpureumCenchrus purpureuse6
Treatment
manure at 5 t ha-1e6
Outcome
ash contente6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
10 t ha-1 manure application ratee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Enhancing P. purpureum with manure at 5 t ha-1 had higher ash content and improved acceptability by WAD rams than grass with 10 t ha-1 manure application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1626 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pennisetum purpureum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–37 · show in text ↑

fertilization · pest · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.