Paper · 1996

Present and potential future nitrogen gains from legumes in major Soil Zones of the prairies

V. O. Biederbeck; W. A. Rice; Chris van Kessel; et al.

20
claims
35
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two developments have enabled us to realistically estimate N, fixation and N credits from legume crops across the prairies: one is computerized processing of Statistics Canada’s Census of Agriculture crop data by Soil Climatic Zones (SCZ) rather than provincial borders; the other is availability of reliable field 15N data on N fixation (% Ndfa) for various legumes and on partitioning of N (PTN) into harvested and residual parts. Total N fixation for each legume and SCZ was computed on the basis of crop area and SCZ average yields, adjusted for abnormal precipitation, and then multiplied with crop-specific Ndfa and PTN factors. Future legume cropping and N gains were 'guesstimated' according to the most likely crop sequences for various SCZs to be in use by the year 2005. Bctwcen 1991 and 1994 legume hcctaragc increased 69%, due mainly to more pulse cropping, to a total of 2.4 million and is expected to reach 5.5 million by 2005. Dcspitc the increased pulse cropping, 85% of total N fixation in 1994 occurred still in the northern parklands and was overwhelmingly due to forage legumes. The average fixation rate was 104 kg/ha and the total 250 million kg N fixed is equal to 24% of all fertilizer N used in 1994 on 25 million ha of Prairie cropland. In comparison with recent fertilizer N costs the present legume N fixation can be valued at $220 million. Total N credit for 1994 was calculated to be 62 million kg N which is equal to 1/4 of total N fixation and suggests an average net gain of 26 kg N/ha of legume crop, although these amounts vary widely with legume type. Our N credit estimates ranged from a low of 0 kg N/ha for colored beans, to 9.4 for lentils, 18.1 for peas, 36.4 for forage hay legumes and a high of 65.4 kg N/ha for forage seed legumes. Through combination of the N credit effect with crop substitution and ‘rotation’ effects, the inclusion of forage, grain or green manure legumes in rotations can effect substantial energy savings for Prairie cropping systems. With continued expansion of legume crops and partial adoption of fallow replacement green manuring, N fixation is projected to total around 550 million kg N by 2005 with a residual N credit of about 190 million kg, indicating an average net gain of 35 kg N/ha. The N gains from legume cropping are forecast to provide most of the N required for reasonable yields by a following cereal or oilseed crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume hectarage increased 69% between 1991 and 1994, mainly through more pulse cropping.

Taxon
legumest0
Outcome
legume hcctaragce1
Direction
increasede1
Value
69%e1
Setting
major Soil Zones of the prairiest1

Verbatim

t0

“nitrogen gains from legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
t1

“major Soil Zones of the prairies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bctwcen 1991 and 1994 legume hcctaragc increased 69%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–834 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume hectarage totalled 2.4 million in 1994.

Taxon
legumest0
Outcome
legume hcctaragce1
Value
2.4 millione2

Verbatim

t0

“nitrogen gains from legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bctwcen 1991 and 1994 legume hcctaragc increased 69%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–834 · show in text ↑
e2

“to a total of 2.4 million”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–896 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Legume hectarage is expected to reach 5.5 million by 2005.

Taxon
legumest0
Outcome
legume hcctaragce1
Value
5.5 millione3

Verbatim

t0

“nitrogen gains from legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bctwcen 1991 and 1994 legume hcctaragc increased 69%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–834 · show in text ↑
e3

“is expected to reach 5.5 million by 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–941 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage legumes accounted for 85% of total N fixation in 1994, which occurred mainly in the northern parklands.

Taxon
forage legumese4
Outcome
total N fixatione4
Value
85%e4
Setting
northern parklandse4

Verbatim

e4

“85% of total N fixation in 1994 occurred still in the northern parklands and was overwhelmingly due to forage legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1098 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average N fixation rate of legumes was 104 kg/ha.

Taxon
legumest0
Outcome
average fixation ratee5
Value
104 kg/hae5

Verbatim

t0

“nitrogen gains from legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e5

“The average fixation rate was 104 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total legume N fixation in 1994 was 250 million kg N.

Taxon
legumest0
Outcome
N fixede6
Value
250 million kg Ne6

Verbatim

t0

“nitrogen gains from legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e6

“the total 250 million kg N fixed is equal to 24% of all fertilizer N used in 1994”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total legume N fixation in 1994 equalled 24% of all fertilizer N used that year.

Taxon
legumest0
Outcome
N fixede6
Value
24%e6
Comparator
all fertilizer N used in 1994e6

Verbatim

t0

“nitrogen gains from legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e6

“the total 250 million kg N fixed is equal to 24% of all fertilizer N used in 1994”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Present legume N fixation can be valued at $220 million, compared with recent fertilizer N costs.

Taxon
legumee7
Outcome
legume N fixatione7
Value
$220 millione7
Comparator
recent fertilizer N costse7

Verbatim

e7

“In comparison with recent fertilizer N costs the present legume N fixation can be valued at $220 million”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1368 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total N credit for 1994 was 62 million kg N.

Taxon
legumest0
Outcome
Total N credite0
Value
62 million kg Ne0

Verbatim

t0

“nitrogen gains from legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Total N credit for 1994 was calculated to be 62 million kg N which is equal to 1/4 of total N fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1472 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total N credit for 1994 equalled one quarter of total N fixation.

Taxon
legumest0
Outcome
Total N credite0
Value
1/4e0
Comparator
total N fixatione0

Verbatim

t0

“nitrogen gains from legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Total N credit for 1994 was calculated to be 62 million kg N which is equal to 1/4 of total N fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1472 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume crops gave an average net N gain of 26 kg N/ha, although the amounts vary widely with legume type.

Taxon
legume crope1
Outcome
average net gaine1
Value
26 kg N/hae1
Qualifier
although these amounts vary widely with legume typee1

Verbatim

e1

“suggests an average net gain of 26 kg N/ha of legume crop, although these amounts vary widely with legume type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1587 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Colored beans had the lowest N credit estimate, 0 kg N/ha.

Taxon
colored beanse2
Outcome
N credit estimatese2
Direction
lowe2
Value
0 kg N/hae2

Verbatim

e2

“Our N credit estimates ranged from a low of 0 kg N/ha for colored beans, to 9.4 for lentils, 18.1 for peas, 36.4 for forage hay legumes and a high of 65.4 kg N/ha for forage seed legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1775 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentils had an N credit estimate of 9.4.

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise2
Outcome
N credit estimatese2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
9.4e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Our N credit estimates ranged from a low of 0 kg N/ha for colored beans, to 9.4 for lentils, 18.1 for peas, 36.4 for forage hay legumes and a high of 65.4 kg N/ha for forage seed legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1775 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peas had an N credit estimate of 18.1.

Outcome
N credit estimatese2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
18.1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Our N credit estimates ranged from a low of 0 kg N/ha for colored beans, to 9.4 for lentils, 18.1 for peas, 36.4 for forage hay legumes and a high of 65.4 kg N/ha for forage seed legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1775 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage hay legumes had an N credit estimate of 36.4.

Taxon
forage hay legumese2
Outcome
N credit estimatese2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
36.4e2

Verbatim

e2

“Our N credit estimates ranged from a low of 0 kg N/ha for colored beans, to 9.4 for lentils, 18.1 for peas, 36.4 for forage hay legumes and a high of 65.4 kg N/ha for forage seed legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1775 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage seed legumes had the highest N credit estimate, 65.4 kg N/ha.

Taxon
forage seed legumese2
Outcome
N credit estimatese2
Direction
highe2
Value
65.4 kg N/hae2

Verbatim

e2

“Our N credit estimates ranged from a low of 0 kg N/ha for colored beans, to 9.4 for lentils, 18.1 for peas, 36.4 for forage hay legumes and a high of 65.4 kg N/ha for forage seed legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1775 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Including forage, grain or green manure legumes in rotations can give substantial energy savings for Prairie cropping systems.

Taxon
legumest0
Treatment
the inclusion of forage, grain or green manure legumes in rotationse3
Outcome
energy savingse3

Verbatim

t0

“nitrogen gains from legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e3

“the inclusion of forage, grain or green manure legumes in rotations can effect substantial energy savings for Prairie cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1867–2001 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Legume N fixation is projected to total about 550 million kg N by 2005.

Taxon
legume cropse5
Outcome
N fixatione4
Value
550 million kg Ne4

Verbatim

e4

“N fixation is projected to total around 550 million kg N by 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2103–2167 · show in text ↑
e5

“With continued expansion of legume crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2003–2043 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Legume residual N credit is projected at about 190 million kg by 2005.

Taxon
legume cropse5
Outcome
residual N credite4
Value
190 million kge4

Verbatim

e4

“N fixation is projected to total around 550 million kg N by 2005 with a residual N credit of about 190 million kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2103–2216 · show in text ↑
e5

“With continued expansion of legume crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2003–2043 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Legume crops are projected to give an average net N gain of 35 kg N/ha by 2005.

Taxon
legume cropse5
Outcome
average net gaine4
Value
35 kg N/hae4

Verbatim

e4

“indicating an average net gain of 35 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2218–2262 · show in text ↑
e5

“With continued expansion of legume crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2003–2043 · show in text ↑