Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the reproductive, productive and physicochemical characteristics of fruits (fruit volume and soluble solids) of ‘Packham’s Triumph’ pear trees treated with different doses of phytoregulators. The experiment was carried out in the 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 cycles, using 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 2-chloroethyl phosphonic acid (Etefon) and 6-Benzyladenine (BA) phytoregulators, each at doses of 200 and 300 ml L-1. The experimental design consisted of a randomized block with five replicates, where each experimental unit consisted of one plant. Significance was only found for soluble solids in the 2014/2015 harvest, observing that the highest mean was identified in plants treated with 300 ml L-1 Etefon, (15 °Brix), while the lowest soluble solids content was observed with the dose of 200 mg L-1 of NAA, (11 °Brix); in the 2015/2016 crop, the highest number of inflorescences of the year was identified in plants treated with 200 ml L-1 of Etefon, (1.66) and the lowest value for the treatment with 300 ml L-1 of BA, (0.17). Effective fruiting in the value of 58.33% was also observed and verified for the plants treated with 300 mg L-1 of NAA, differing from all except from 200 ml L-1 BA. Only the plant growth regulator, NAA, at the dose of 200 mg L-1 provides low content of soluble solids in the fruits and Etefon 300 mg L-1 provides high content of solids solubles. The lowest number of branch inflorescences of the year was in plants treated with 6-Benzyladenine at a dose of 300 ml L-1 and the highest at a dose of Etefon 200 mg L-1. The NAA dose of 300 mg L-1 and 6-Benzyladenine dose of 200 ml L-1 had greater effective fruiting, but not did not reflect on the production per plant and productive efficiency. There was no benefit observed in the return bloom with the application of phytoregulators. Besides, no benefits were observed in the return bloom with the application of phytoregulators.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Etefon at 300 ml L-1 gave the highest soluble solids (15 °Brix) in the 2014/2015 harvest.
- Taxon
- pear trees
Pyrus communise1 - Organ / stage
- fruitse1
- Treatment
- 300 ml L-1 Etefone2
- Outcome
- soluble solidse2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 15 °Brixe2
- Qualifier
- 2014/2015 harveste2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“fruits (fruit volume and soluble solids) of ‘Packham’s Triumph’ pear trees treated with different doses of phytoregulators”
e2“Significance was only found for soluble solids in the 2014/2015 harvest, observing that the highest mean was identified in plants treated with 300 ml L-1 Etefon, (15 °Brix)”
Claim · model-written summary
NAA at 200 mg L-1 gave the lowest soluble solids content (11 °Brix) in the 2014/2015 harvest.
- Taxon
- pear trees
Pyrus communise1 - Treatment
- 200 mg L-1 of NAAe3
- Outcome
- soluble solids contente3
- Direction
- loweste3
- Value
- 11 °Brixe3
- Qualifier
- 2014/2015 harveste2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“fruits (fruit volume and soluble solids) of ‘Packham’s Triumph’ pear trees treated with different doses of phytoregulators”
e2“Significance was only found for soluble solids in the 2014/2015 harvest, observing that the highest mean was identified in plants treated with 300 ml L-1 Etefon, (15 °Brix)”
e3“while the lowest soluble solids content was observed with the dose of 200 mg L-1 of NAA, (11 °Brix)”
Claim · model-written summary
Etefon at 200 ml L-1 gave the highest number of inflorescences of the year (1.66) in the 2015/2016 crop.
- Taxon
- pear trees
Pyrus communise1 - Treatment
- 200 ml L-1 of Etefone4
- Outcome
- number of inflorescences of the yeare4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Value
- 1.66e4
- Qualifier
- 2015/2016 crope4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“fruits (fruit volume and soluble solids) of ‘Packham’s Triumph’ pear trees treated with different doses of phytoregulators”
e4“in the 2015/2016 crop, the highest number of inflorescences of the year was identified in plants treated with 200 ml L-1 of Etefon, (1.66)”
Claim · model-written summary
BA at 300 ml L-1 gave the lowest number of inflorescences of the year (0.17).
- Taxon
- pear trees
Pyrus communise1 - Treatment
- 300 ml L-1 of BAe5
- Outcome
- number of inflorescences of the yeare4
- Direction
- loweste5
- Value
- 0.17e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“fruits (fruit volume and soluble solids) of ‘Packham’s Triumph’ pear trees treated with different doses of phytoregulators”
e4“in the 2015/2016 crop, the highest number of inflorescences of the year was identified in plants treated with 200 ml L-1 of Etefon, (1.66)”
e5“the lowest value for the treatment with 300 ml L-1 of BA, (0.17)”
Claim · model-written summary
NAA at 300 mg L-1 gave greater effective fruiting (58.33%) than all treatments except BA at 200 ml L-1.
- Taxon
- pear trees
Pyrus communise1 - Treatment
- 300 mg L-1 of NAAe6
- Outcome
- Effective fruitinge6
- Direction
- greatere7
- Value
- 58.33%e6
- Comparator
- all except from 200 ml L-1 BAe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“fruits (fruit volume and soluble solids) of ‘Packham’s Triumph’ pear trees treated with different doses of phytoregulators”
e6“Effective fruiting in the value of 58.33% was also observed and verified for the plants treated with 300 mg L-1 of NAA, differing from all except from 200 ml L-1 BA”
e7“The NAA dose of 300 mg L-1 and 6-Benzyladenine dose of 200 ml L-1 had greater effective fruiting, but not did not reflect on the production per plant and productive efficiency”
Claim · model-written summary
NAA at 300 mg L-1 and BA at 200 ml L-1 gave greater effective fruiting but did not increase production per plant or productive efficiency.
- Taxon
- pear trees
Pyrus communise1 - Treatment
- NAA dose of 300 mg L-1 and 6-Benzyladenine dose of 200 ml L-1e7
- Outcome
- production per plant and productive efficiencye7
- Direction
- did not reflect one7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“fruits (fruit volume and soluble solids) of ‘Packham’s Triumph’ pear trees treated with different doses of phytoregulators”
e7“The NAA dose of 300 mg L-1 and 6-Benzyladenine dose of 200 ml L-1 had greater effective fruiting, but not did not reflect on the production per plant and productive efficiency”
Claim · model-written summary
Phytoregulator application gave no benefit for return bloom in pear.
- Taxon
- pear trees
Pyrus communise1 - Treatment
- phytoregulatorse0
- Outcome
- return bloome0
- Direction
- no benefite0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“fruits (fruit volume and soluble solids) of ‘Packham’s Triumph’ pear trees treated with different doses of phytoregulators”
e0“There was no benefit observed in the return bloom with the application of phytoregulators”
The same questions in other papers
1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.