Paper · 2019 · PeerJ

Promotion of growth and metal accumulation of alfalfa by coinoculation with Sinorhizobium and Agrobacterium under copper and zinc stress

Liru Jian; Xiaoli Bai; Hui Zhang; et al.

13
claims
23
verbatim quotes
71
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The Legume-Rhizobium symbiosis has been proposed as a promising technique for the phytoremediation of contaminated soils due to its beneficial activity in symbiotic nitrogen fixation. However, numerous studies have shown that excessive heavy metals reduce the efficiency of symbiotic nodulation with Rhizobium and inhibit plant growth. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the synergistic effects of IAA-producing bacteria and Rhizobium on Medicago lupulina growth under Cu and Zn stress. Pot experiments showed that 400 mg kg −1 Cu 2 + and Zn 2 + greatly inhibited plant growth, but dual inoculation of Medicago lupulina with Sinorhizobium meliloti CCNWSX0020 and Agrobacterium tumefaciens CCNWGS0286 significantly increased the number of nodules and plant biomass by enhancing antioxidant activities. Under double stress of 400 mg kg −1 Cu 2 + and Zn 2 + , the nodule number and nitrogenase activities of dual-inoculated plants were 48.5% and 154.4% higher, respectively, than those of plants inoculated with Sinorhizobium meliloti . The root and above-ground portion lengths of the dual-inoculated plants were 32.6% and 14.1% greater, respectively, than those of the control, while the root and above-ground portion dry weights were 34.3% and 32.2% greater, respectively, than those of the control. Compared with S. meliloti and A. tumefaciens single inoculation, coinoculation increased total Cu uptake by 39.1% and 47.5% and increased total Zn uptake by 35.4% and 44.2%, respectively, under double metal stress conditions. Therefore, coinoculation with Sinorhizobium meliloti and Agrobacterium tumefaciens enhances metal phytoextraction by increasing plant growth and antioxidant activities under Cu/Zn stress, which provides a new approach for bioremediation in heavy metal-contaminated soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper and zinc at 400 mg kg −1 inhibited Medicago lupulina growth.

Taxon
Medicago lupulinaMedicago lupulinae0
Treatment
400 mg kg −1 Cu 2 + and Zn 2 +e0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago lupulina
Medicago lupulina · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot experiments showed that 400 mg kg −1 Cu 2 + and Zn 2 + greatly inhibited plant growth, but dual inoculation of Medicago lupulina with Sinorhizobium meliloti CCNWSX0020 and Agrobacterium tumefaciens CCNWGS0286 significantly increased the number of nodules and plant biomass by enhancing antioxidant activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual bacterial inoculation increased nodule number under metal stress.

Taxon
Medicago lupulinaMedicago lupulinae0
Treatment
dual inoculation of Medicago lupulina with Sinorhizobium meliloti CCNWSX0020 and Agrobacterium tumefaciens CCNWGS0286e0
Interactor
Sinorhizobium meliloti CCNWSX0020Sinorhizobium meliloti CCNWSX0020e0symbiont
Second interactor
Agrobacterium tumefaciens CCNWGS0286Agrobacterium tumefaciens CCNWGS0286e0symbiont
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago lupulina
Medicago lupulina · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti CCNWSX0020
Sinorhizobium meliloti CCNWSX0020 · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium tumefaciens CCNWGS0286
Agrobacterium tumefaciens CCNWGS0286 · Second interactor · picture of the speciesClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot experiments showed that 400 mg kg −1 Cu 2 + and Zn 2 + greatly inhibited plant growth, but dual inoculation of Medicago lupulina with Sinorhizobium meliloti CCNWSX0020 and Agrobacterium tumefaciens CCNWGS0286 significantly increased the number of nodules and plant biomass by enhancing antioxidant activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual bacterial inoculation increased plant biomass under metal stress.

Taxon
Medicago lupulinaMedicago lupulinae0
Treatment
dual inoculation of Medicago lupulina with Sinorhizobium meliloti CCNWSX0020 and Agrobacterium tumefaciens CCNWGS0286e0
Interactor
Sinorhizobium meliloti CCNWSX0020Sinorhizobium meliloti CCNWSX0020e0symbiont
Second interactor
Agrobacterium tumefaciens CCNWGS0286Agrobacterium tumefaciens CCNWGS0286e0symbiont
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago lupulina
Medicago lupulina · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti CCNWSX0020
Sinorhizobium meliloti CCNWSX0020 · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium tumefaciens CCNWGS0286
Agrobacterium tumefaciens CCNWGS0286 · Second interactor · picture of the speciesClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pot experiments showed that 400 mg kg −1 Cu 2 + and Zn 2 + greatly inhibited plant growth, but dual inoculation of Medicago lupulina with Sinorhizobium meliloti CCNWSX0020 and Agrobacterium tumefaciens CCNWGS0286 significantly increased the number of nodules and plant biomass by enhancing antioxidant activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation raised nodule number by 48.5% versus Sinorhizobium inoculation under combined metal stress.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
dual-inoculated plantse0
Interactor
Sinorhizobium melilotiSinorhizobium melilotie0symbiont
Outcome
nodule numbere0
Direction
highere0
Value
48.5%e0
Comparator
plants inoculated with Sinorhizobium melilotie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under double stress of 400 mg kg −1 Cu 2 + and Zn 2 + , the nodule number and nitrogenase activities of dual-inoculated plants were 48.5% and 154.4% higher, respectively, than those of plants inoculated with Sinorhizobium meliloti .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation raised nitrogenase activities by 154.4% versus Sinorhizobium inoculation under combined metal stress.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
dual-inoculated plantse0
Interactor
Sinorhizobium melilotiSinorhizobium melilotie0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogenase activitiese0
Direction
highere0
Value
154.4%e0
Comparator
plants inoculated with Sinorhizobium melilotie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under double stress of 400 mg kg −1 Cu 2 + and Zn 2 + , the nodule number and nitrogenase activities of dual-inoculated plants were 48.5% and 154.4% higher, respectively, than those of plants inoculated with Sinorhizobium meliloti .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation increased root lengths by 32.6% versus control.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
dual-inoculated plantse0
Outcome
root and above-ground portion lengthse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
32.6%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root and above-ground portion lengths of the dual-inoculated plants were 32.6% and 14.1% greater, respectively, than those of the control, while the root and above-ground portion dry weights were 34.3% and 32.2% greater, respectively, than those of the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation increased above-ground portion lengths by 14.1% versus control.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
above-ground portione0
Treatment
dual-inoculated plantse0
Outcome
root and above-ground portion lengthse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
14.1%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root and above-ground portion lengths of the dual-inoculated plants were 32.6% and 14.1% greater, respectively, than those of the control, while the root and above-ground portion dry weights were 34.3% and 32.2% greater, respectively, than those of the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation increased root dry weights by 34.3% versus control.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
dual-inoculated plantse0
Outcome
root and above-ground portion dry weightse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
34.3%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root and above-ground portion lengths of the dual-inoculated plants were 32.6% and 14.1% greater, respectively, than those of the control, while the root and above-ground portion dry weights were 34.3% and 32.2% greater, respectively, than those of the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation increased above-ground portion dry weights by 32.2% versus control.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
above-ground portione0
Treatment
dual-inoculated plantse0
Outcome
root and above-ground portion dry weightse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
32.2%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root and above-ground portion lengths of the dual-inoculated plants were 32.6% and 14.1% greater, respectively, than those of the control, while the root and above-ground portion dry weights were 34.3% and 32.2% greater, respectively, than those of the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation increased total Cu uptake by 39.1% relative to S. meliloti alone.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
coinoculatione0
Interactor
S. melilotiSinorhizobium melilotie0symbiont
Outcome
total Cu uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
39.1%e0
Comparator
S. melilotie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with S. meliloti and A. tumefaciens single inoculation, coinoculation increased total Cu uptake by 39.1% and 47.5% and increased total Zn uptake by 35.4% and 44.2%, respectively, under double metal stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation increased total Cu uptake by 47.5% relative to A. tumefaciens alone.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
coinoculatione0
Interactor
A. tumefaciensAgrobacterium tumefaciense0symbiont
Outcome
total Cu uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
47.5%e0
Comparator
A. tumefaciense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with S. meliloti and A. tumefaciens single inoculation, coinoculation increased total Cu uptake by 39.1% and 47.5% and increased total Zn uptake by 35.4% and 44.2%, respectively, under double metal stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation increased total Zn uptake by 35.4% relative to S. meliloti alone.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
coinoculatione0
Interactor
S. melilotiSinorhizobium melilotie0symbiont
Outcome
total Zn uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35.4%e0
Comparator
S. melilotie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium meliloti · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with S. meliloti and A. tumefaciens single inoculation, coinoculation increased total Cu uptake by 39.1% and 47.5% and increased total Zn uptake by 35.4% and 44.2%, respectively, under double metal stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation increased total Zn uptake by 44.2% relative to A. tumefaciens alone.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
coinoculatione0
Interactor
A. tumefaciensAgrobacterium tumefaciense0symbiont
Outcome
total Zn uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
44.2%e0
Comparator
A. tumefaciense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with S. meliloti and A. tumefaciens single inoculation, coinoculation increased total Cu uptake by 39.1% and 47.5% and increased total Zn uptake by 35.4% and 44.2%, respectively, under double metal stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑

Sinorhizobium meliloti · symbiosis · Medicago lupulinaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Sinorhizobium meliloti · growth · Medicago lupulinaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · Medicago lupulinaPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Medicago lupulinaPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · Sinorhizobium meliloti · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 30 positive, 7 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.